Nation Sites
The Nation Network
CanucksArmy has no direct affiliation to the Vancouver Canucks, Canucks Sports & Entertainment, NHL, or NHLPA
Friedman: Ryan Miller Not Going Anywhere

By Rhys Jessop
Jun 14, 2015, 17:07 EDTUpdated:
This isn’t exactly a revelation if you’ve been following Vancouver’s goaltending situation this year, but Elliotte Friedman might be the first person of his repute to report that the Vancouver Canucks will not be moving Ryan Miller this offseason.
Given Vancouver’s tenuous cap situation and the fact that they had to move a goalie already, this is just confirmation that the writing is on the wall for one of Eddie Lack of Jacob Markstrom.
The report comes courtesy of thought #3 in Friedman’s always must-read 30 Thoughts column. The quote:
Obviously, the goalie debate is the big one in Vancouver. (That topic just never goes away, does it?) After their scouting meetings, Benning was willing to say two things: First, Ryan Miller is not the one being traded. Second, while he is looking to get a second-round draft pick for the one he traded earlier, “We are also looking to make hockey trades.” So, if it is Eddie Lack, for example, it’s not guaranteed to be Lack for a pick. Possible, but not a lock.
We’ve all known of Vancouver’s preference for Miller for a while, especially in light of how quickly they went to a crippled one-legged version over Eddie Lack when push came to shove, so this is less a revelation and more a “yeah, of course he isn’t moving.” Between giving Miller $18 million in free agency, to gifting him the starting role after Lack out-performed him in the preseason and down the stretch last year, to repeatedly floating Lack’s name in trade talks, it’s abundantly clear that the Canucks truly believe that Miller is their guy.
Still, the possibility of a Jacob Markstrom trade is open, and while my cynical Canucks fan gut is telling me that Lack’s going to be the guy on the way out, I just can’t logically see Benning dealing the one solid bet they have at not-catastrophically-bad goaltending next season. Jacob Markstrom is a different guy from years past, but it’s not clear that he’s better, and he was just putrid before. Miller is in fall-off-a-cliff territory for goalies in terms of age and may have a bum knee. Eddie Lack is good right now. Eddie Lack will be good for the next few years. Unless they’re specifically planning on taking a two-year run at Auston Matthews and Nolan Patrick, running with Miller/Markstrom is more likely to blow up in their faces than not.
Here’s what I wrote about Vancouver’s goaltending situation previously this offseason:
If I were a betting man, even though we know that Lack is on the table in a possible goalie trade, I would guess that Benning isn’t actively shopping Eddie Lack right now. Although they seem to much prefer Ryan Miller and are high on Jacob Markstrom, Lack was easily their best goaltender last season and represents Vancouver’s best chance at having league average goaltending next season. It just doesn’t make sense to be actively shopping their best goalie in late-May.
In terms of just stopping the puck, Ryan Miller’s 2014-15 year was below NHL average for just the second time in his NHL career as he struggled tremendously to keep pucks out of Vancouver’s net at 5-on-5. This wasn’t completely unexpected however, as we predicted Miller would be a below average goalie in his first season with Vancouver thanks primarily to age-related decline. Aging another year, we expect him to start trending closer to “should be a backup” territory in the near future, and after suffering a fairly major knee in 2015, who knows how he’ll physically be able to respond.
Jacob Markstrom on the other hand will simply cost too much to play another year in the AHL, especially for a cap-strapped team like the Canucks. While he’s been dynamite in the minor leagues, he’s been catastrophically awful as an NHLer, rocking a career 0.896 save percentage so far. It’s completely possible he turns it around, but talking to guys like Greg Balloch of InGoal Magazine, I get the sense that Markstrom still has fairly severe holes in his game that are a major hindrance to having NHL success. Specifically, he has to get much faster and read the play better to avoid chasing the puck and opening up holes NHL shooters can exploit.
The Canucks like Markstrom, but he’s not exactly young anymore and his contract situation will basically necessitate a goalie moving on this offseason, so you can see why Canucks fans are pensive about Eddie Lack. He’s good, he’s not in decline, and he’s a fan favourite. I can’t speak for the whole fanbase, but I get the sense that trading Eddie Lack would go over like a lead balloon in Vancouver given how fans have grown attached to the goofy Swede, especially if the return is little more than magic beans.
We now know for sure that Miller won’t be the odd man out, so the best case scenario here is probably to turn Jacob Markstrom into some kind of asset. I can’t see the Canucks improving through a Lack trade, and it would likely be wildly unpopular in this market.
Breaking News
- How feasible is it for the Canucks to select both Ruck twins at the 2026 Entry Draft?
- Canucks interview Patrick Burke, son of Brian Burke, for open GM position: report
- Despite strong faceoff metrics, Aatu Räty struggles to find consistent minutes on 2025-26 Canucks: Year in Review
- Ben Berard signs AHL contract extension with Abbotsford Canucks
- Zeev Buium emerged as a future leader throughout rookie season with Canucks: Year in Review
