Canucks scoring chance totals: Playoffs
By Cam Charron
12 years agoWhat follows here is a table that’s quite data-heavy.
As you probably know, we count scoring chances at Canucks Army. After every game, we post a recap with a table of players on both teams, the number of scoring chances they were on the ice that were for their team, and the number of scoring chances that went against their team.
So for the playoffs, we’ve tallied it up. For what we define as a scoring chance, click here.
Here are the totals at even strength.
# | Name | EV TOI | Chances For/60 | Chances Against/60 | Diff | Rate | |||
25 | Ebbett | 7 | 8.6 | 0.0 | 8.6 | 100.0% | |||
29 | Rome | 10.2 | 23.5 | 0.0 | 23.5 | 100.0% | |||
40 | Lapierre | 50.3 | 16.7 | 10.7 | 6.0 | 60.9% | |||
23 | Edler | 83.8 | 19.3 | 13.6 | 5.7 | 58.7% | |||
1 | Team (Luongo) | 80.6 | 21.6 | 15.6 | 6.0 | 58.0% | |||
9 | Kassian | 19.1 | 18.8 | 15.7 | 3.1 | 54.5% | |||
17 | Kesler | 72 | 17.5 | 15.0 | 2.5 | 53.8% | |||
14 | Burrows | 67.8 | 19.5 | 16.8 | 2.7 | 53.7% | |||
7 | Booth | 68.1 | 19.4 | 19.4 | 0.0 | 50.0% | |||
33 | H. Sedin | 80.3 | 20.9 | 21.7 | -0.7 | 49.1% | |||
3 | Bieksa | 89.9 | 21.4 | 22.7 | -1.3 | 48.5% | |||
8 | Tanev | 68.9 | 13.9 | 16.6 | -2.6 | 45.7% | |||
36 | Hansen | 64 | 15 | 17.8 | -2.8 | 45.7% | |||
20 | Higgins | 56 | 11.8 | 15.0 | -3.2 | 44.0% | |||
2 | Hamhuis | 83 | 18.8 | 24.6 | -5.8 | 43.3% | |||
21 | Raymond | 54.2 | 15.5 | 21.1 | -5.5 | 42.4% | |||
6 | Salo | 66.1 | 10.9 | 16.3 | -5.4 | 40.0% | |||
22 | D. Sedin | 31.5 | 19 | 28.6 | -9.5 | 40.0% | |||
35 | Team (Schneier) | 142.9 | 13.4 | 20.6 | -7.1 | 39.5% | |||
4 | Ballard | 53.8 | 10 | 15.6 | -5.6 | 39.1% | |||
26 | Pahlsson | 59.3 | 10.1 | 17.2 | -7.1 | 37.0% | |||
27 | Malhotra | 31.8 | 13.2 | 26.4 | -13.2 | 33.3% | |||
32 | Weise | 8.3 | 0 | 50.6 | -50.6 | 0.0% | |||
34 | Bitz | 2.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | |||
# | Name | PP TOI | Chances For/2 | ||||||
22 | D. Sedin | 8.6 | 2.34 | ||||||
2 | Hamhuis | 17.9 | 1.46 | ||||||
17 | Kesler | 22.3 | 1.26 | ||||||
35 | Team (Schneider) | 16.9 | 1.18 | ||||||
33 | H. Sedin | 25.2 | 1.11 | ||||||
23 | Edler | 21.6 | 0.93 | ||||||
21 | Raymond | 4.9 | 0.82 | ||||||
3 | Bieksa | 14.9 | 0.67 | ||||||
1 | Team (Luongo) | 16.4 | 0.49 | ||||||
14 | Burrows | 13.9 | 0.43 | ||||||
20 | Higgins | 12.2 | 0.33 | ||||||
6 | Salo | 14.0 | 0.29 | ||||||
7 | Booth | 12.5 | 0.16 | ||||||
25 | Ebbett | 3.3 | 0.00 | ||||||
36 | Hansen | 2.2 | 0.00 | ||||||
# | Name | SH TOI | Chances Against/2 | ||||||
29 | Rome | 2.2 | 0.00 | ||||||
6 | Salo | 14.4 | 0.42 | ||||||
20 | Higgins | 9.6 | 0.42 | ||||||
23 | Edler | 16.5 | 0.73 | ||||||
26 | Pahlsson | 9.7 | 0.82 | ||||||
1 | Team (Luongo) | 18.9 | 0.85 | ||||||
17 | Kesler | 15.9 | 0.88 | ||||||
4 | Ballard | 4.5 | 0.90 | ||||||
14 | Burrows | 12.9 | 0.93 | ||||||
27 | Malhotra | 16.2 | 0.99 | ||||||
8 | Tanev | 5.9 | 1.02 | ||||||
35 | Team (Schneider) | 22.9 | 1.05 | ||||||
36 | Hansen | 15.9 | 1.13 | ||||||
21 | Raymond | 3.3 | 1.22 | ||||||
2 | Hamhuis | 20.5 | 1.27 | ||||||
3 | Bieksa | 18.6 | 1.29 | ||||||
STF | STA | STEV | EVF | EVA | EV | OVF | OVA | Overall | |
Game 1 | 13 | 12 | 52.0% | 17 | 12 | 58.6% | 21 | 18 | 53.8% |
Game 2 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 13 | 9 | 59.1% | 15 | 13 | 53.6% |
Game 3 | 4 | 10 | 28.6% | 8 | 11 | 42.1% | 9 | 13 | 40.9% |
Game 4 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 8 | 12 | 40.0% | 14 | 21 | 40.0% |
Game 5 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% | 16 | 26 | 38.1% | 21 | 30 | 41.2% |
Totals | 27 | 46 | 37.0% | 62 | 70 | 47.0% | 80 | 95 | 45.7% |
PPF | SHA | PP Rate | SHF | PPA | SH Rate | ||||
Game 1 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | |||
Game 2 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | |||
Game 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | – | |||
Game 4 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | |||
Game 5 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | – | |||
Totals | 15 | 20 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 25.0% |
Recent articles from Cam Charron