Nation Network Prospect Profile #5: Matthew Tkachuk

Matthew Tkachuk

There’s a whole lot to like about Matthew Tkachuk, son of former NHLer Keith Tkachuk. He’s big, he’s tough, he’s got a great shot and impressive vision and playmaking ability. As the fifth ranked prospect on our list, he falls right into the wheelhouse of some Canadian teams, making the locals pay even closer attention.

But Tkachuk hasn’t been without his detractors, and while you certainly can’t claim that he isn’t incredibly talented, there is a case to be made that his numbers have been inflated a bit because of who he spent the 2015-16 season playing with. Read on to find out more.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below


Age: 18 (December 11th, 1997)

Birthplace: Scottsdale, Arizona, USA

Frame: 6′ 1″, 194 lbs

Position: LW

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Handedness: Left

Draft Year Team: London Knights

Accomplishments/Awards: U17 WHC Gold Medal (2013-14); U18 WJC Gold Medal (2014-15); CHL Memorial Cup Champion, CHL Top Prospects Game, OHL Champion, OHL First All-Star Team, U20 WJC Bronze Medal (2015-16)


Matthew Tkachuk PPG

1 1 100.00% 0.7212 0.7212

Read more about pGPS here.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below


NHL CSS ISS Future Considerations Hockey Prospect Pronman McKeen’s Hockey News McKenzie Button
2 (NA) 4 5 5 6 6 4 4 5

From Curtis Joe of Elite Prospects:

A multi-dimensional energy winger that plays a pro-style, adaptive game. Well-versed as a guy who can consistently put up points, but also as an agitator who plays with a little bit of bite and nastiness. Skates with excellent balance and speed, outclassing many in his age range. No lack of offensive instincts and knows how to score in many different ways. Confidence in his abilities and playing to the extent of his capabilities strengthens his work ethic and creativity. All-in-all, a unique and effective forward who defines his own limits and seeks to exceed them, along with all on-ice expectations.

From Corey Pronman of ESPN, via ABC News:

Keith Tkachuk‘s son has been a standout for years at multiple levels. He was great last season in the USHL and with the USNTDP, was a top player at the world under-18 championship, and a top player this season in the OHL. He is a multi-dimensional scoring winger. You talk to any scout about Tkachuk, they come back raving about his hockey IQ. He has great vision and offensive creativity, and makes quick, precise decisions with the puck. He can dangle defensemen, and create offense out of nothing, but Tkachuk is also a relentless worker. He wins more than his fair share of battles, and is his father’s son on some days, being a pain in the rear for many defenders and goalies.
His speed isn’t at the same level as his hands and vision. He’s not slow, but he’s certainly not a top-end speedster, either. Tkachuk can also get caught cheating a little defensively, an area of his game that he’ll need to tighten up.

From Steve Kournianos of The Draft Analyst:

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

In this forceful, rigid yet graceful sport, there are few who possess a diverse resume of skills necessary to display a consistent level of dominance practically on a shift-to-shift basis. Terms like “the complete package” are often used to describe these rare birds, and as cliche as it sounds, it certainly is the best way to sum up players like Matt Tkachuk. Born and reared in the St. Louis area’s under-appreciated hockey environment, Tkachuk, in reality, could have trained anywhere when you consider the mentorship he received right in his own home. And while his father Keith — close to a decade removed from an all-star NHL career — has left a huge imprint in both the looks and skills department, we view Matthew as a bit more patient and decisive with both his strength and his playmaking ability. The kid doesn’t have a glaring weakness, and while some may point to skating, he has a long and powerful enough stride to win the occasional footrace. And even the roadrunner types who can catch up to his up-the-ice attacks are generally limitless in preventing him from doing what he wants or needs to do. Tkachuk has a very heavy and accurate shot which can change speeds and confuse goalies, but his penchant for delivering scoring-chance set-ups at the very last moment is yet another reason why he’ll be so coveted come Draft Day. Throw in leadership qualities and a desire to make opponents pay the price physically, and you have the makings of the best pure power forward prospect available for the 2016 draft.

From the Hockey News Draft Preview:

The only, and we mean only, knock on Tkachuk is his skating. And even that is not enough to deter most scouts from getting very excited about the son of former NHL 50-goal man Keith Tkachuk.
The elder Tkachuk was more of a pure sniper (538 goals in 1,201 games), and while the son can score, he excels more at setting up teammates. Both are big and imposing around the net, but the younger Tkachuk doesn’t quite have the nasty bite his father had. “The sky is the limit with this guy,” said one scout. “Everyone tries to poke holes in him, but all he’s done is answer all those critics and then some. He’s going to be a hell of an NHL player.”
Playing on one of the most dominant lines in major junior with Mitch Marner and Christian Dvorak in London, Tkachuk has proved he can complement elite players, not hold them back. “If you were teaching Hockey 101, you would look at this kid and say, ‘This is what you want from your left winger,'” said another scout. “He’s strong on his skates, he battles for pucks and he has a soft spot around the net.”

Our Take:

The son of former All-Star Keith Tkachuk, Matthew resembles his father in many ways. But he is not made entirely in his father’s image, as has been suggested by some. For one, he doesn’t have the same snarl that his father had – though he’s no shrinking violet. But, to be fair, Keith Tkachuk at 17 didn’t have that same snarl yet either, so there’s still time for Matthew to get a bit nastier. Additionally, though he can score plenty of goals, he doesn’t have the same deadly shot that his father made a living with. Instead, he’s got better vision and passing ability.

The suggestion that he’s a good playmaker is not simply a reaction to his sky-high assist totals – his ability in that regard can be verified visually. He does have a bit of an abnormally high rate of secondary assists, but even if we take those away, he still has one of the most impressive totals of primary points in the draft. As Ryan Biech mentioned earlier this week, a very impressive table built by Brian Fogarty at Hockey Prophets breaks down all of Tkachuk’s secondary assists this season and takes a closer look at which goals he was instrumental on and which were just statistical noise.

The biggest knock on Tkachuk this season has been who he plays with: he spent the year on a line with elite Toronto prospect Mitch Marner and Arizona prospect (and former OHL scoring champion) Christian Dvorak, two players who have absolutely no problem piling up a mountain of points. The worry is, how much of his success is due to his linemates?

The answer of course is: a lot. But this isn’t necessarily a bad thing. If you’re going to play with two dominant players, it should come as no surprise that they play a large part in your success. The question becomes whether or not a player can continue to be successful without those linemates – a question that is tricky to answer when the line is rarely, if ever, separated.

The line of Tkachuk, Marner, and Dvorak played together almost exclusively this season, making it different to compare Tkachuk’s numbers with and without them. All the same, I built a WOWY table for Tkachuk (with the help of Canucks Army programmer Dylan Kirkby, who scraped the game sheet data).

Tkachuk WOWY

The chart demonstrates that Tkachuk’s numbers were clearly better with Marner and Dvorak than without them – but how could they not be? The second and third-to-last rows show a 5% drop in GF% when the line is missing just one of Marner and Dvorak, indicating that the presence of all three is important. The final line shows Tkachuk’s numbers when neither of the other two are on the ice. Compared to the rest of his stats, these look particularly bleak – yet even then he’s recording a goals-for percentage of over 60 per cent, which is fantastic, and is still better than about three quarters of the OHL, including high end prospects like Mike McLeod (58.6), Mikhail Sergachev (56.3), and Will Bitten (47.3). And of course the sample size in this context leaves plenty to be desired.

Speculating on how much of Tkachuk’s success is due to Marner and Dvorak is just that – speculation. It isn’t exactly fair to him to assume that they’re the source of his success, when he hasn’t gotten a legitimate opportunity to sink or swim on his own. Qualitative analysis of Tkachuk’s play suggests that he is still worthy of a top five pick, and we don’t have much else to go on at this point. Even if Tkachuk had help getting to his impressive point totals, we can’t really hold it against him without seeing a large body of work in other situations.

Tkachuk had elite level production in his draft season, and that makes analyzing his potential with the pGPS system a little tricky. His era adjusted points per game were the 99th percentile of the 8500 OHL players in the pGPS database. He had only one match using the standard similarity threshold of 95% (Andrew Cassels’ 151-point draft+1 OHL season in 1988). Just below that 95% are same very impressive names, including John Tavares, Corey Perry, Jason Allison and Jason Spezza, all with greater than 94% similarity to Tkachuk’s 2015-16 season. Other stars such as Steven Stamkos and Eric Lindross (remember that era adjustment is used) were also above 90% similarity.

Nation Network Draft Profiles

Prospect Profile #6: Clayton Keller (C) Prospect Profile #7: Mikhail Sergachev (D)
Prospect Profile #8: Jakob Chychrun (D) Prospect Profile #9: Olli Juolevi (D)
Prospect Profile #10: Tyson Jost (C) Prospect Profile #11: Alexander Nylander (RW/LW)
Prospect Profile #12: Jake Bean (D) Prospect Profile #13: Kieffer Bellows (C/LW)
Prospect Profile #14: Michael McLeod (C) Prospect Profile #15: Logan Brown (C)
Prospect Profile #16: Julien Gauthier Prospect Profile #17: Dante Fabbro (D)
Prospect Profile #18: Charlie McAvoy (D) Prospect Profile #19: Luke Kunin (C)
Prospect Profile #20: Alex Debrincat (C/LW) Prospect Profile #21: Vitali Abramov (RW)
Prospect Profile #22: Max Jones (W/C) Prospect Profile #23: Pascal Laberge (C/LW)
Prospect Profile #24: Tage Thompson (C/RW) Prospect Profile #25: German Rubtsov (C)
Prospect Profile #26: Samuel Girard (D) Prospect Profile #27: Rasmus Asplund (C/LW)
Prospect Profile #28: Will Bitten (C) Prospect Profile #29: Tyler Benson (LW)
Prospect Profile #30: Carl Grundstrom (LW) Prospect Profiles #60 – #31 (2nd Round)

  • andyg

    “For one, he doesn’t have the same snarl that his father had – though he’s no shrinking violet. But, to be fair, Keith Tkachuk at 17 didn’t have that same snarl yet either, so there’s still time for Matthew to get a bit nastier.”

    Apparently superfluous sentences are not the Kryptonite of basement bloggers…

    • Hockey Warrior

      NM00 you are like the annoying/drunk girl at the party no one wants to talk to. You make little sense and even when you say something smart (5 – 10% of the time) nobody cares. But you’re so loud and obnoxious somebody has to engage with you, if for no other reason than to put you in your place, and free up some space for the other guys to meet your better looking, more intelligent friends. You’re the cliché mother hen wrecking the party for everyone, but don’t worry guys I just took one for the team. I’ll take NM00 home so you don’t have to.

      NM00 = Rosie O’Donnell in a romantic comedy aka “not the leading lady”

  • andyg

    I still think that any of Tkachuk, Dubois, Juolevi, Nylander or Chychrun would be a home run in this spot. The others would be a reach and trading the pick away or down absent a superstar young player in return is a terrible idea.

    • DSP

      So you expect there to be four home runs available at 5 (assuming Tkachuk or Dubois goes fourth) and you think trading down is a terrible idea?

      I like Tkachuk as a prospect but god damn if those love letters from the scouts don’t make me want to see him bust.

      • andyg

        Yes, that first is part is literally what I just wrote. I think there are three elite prospects at the top, six high end ones after that and then the drop-off is considerable. Unless there was a really compelling offer — and I find it hard to imagine that someone would make a good enough offer to drop out of these two tiers. Maybe Montreal if they gave up a good young player but I can’t see it in their interest to do so just to possibly get Dubois. I don’t think we’ll go wrong with any of the players at the top end of the draft, but I do think it’s not wise to drop much below.

        I cannot fathom why you’d want to see any prospect bust, much less because some scouts are high on them. I am happy with the Etem trade and mixed on the Granlund but that doesn’t make me wish ill on either Jensen or Shinkaruk.

        • Wanda Fuca

          You suggest six high end prospects after the top three, yet you’ve only listed five. Who is your sixth? I really appreciate your balanced voice, btw, in your exchanges with some of the loose cannons aboard this ship, not to mention your ongoing solid analytical approach to the questions that concern us all about the team.

          • andyg

            Sorry I meant Sergyachev. I don’t think he’s as good as the other two d men though. I would personally like to see us take any of the three forwards; I’d love Nylander just because we don’t have a real game breaker outside of Boeser in the system. the combine and interview for all of these were also quite good. If we seriously got a top prospect plus pick from another team up to nine if consider it but I don’t think it will happen. I absolutely wouldn’t drop out of the top nine.

        • Hockey Warrior

          The problem here is that you are trying to be an independent thinker…

          That has never been your game PB.

          You are an NM00 derivative that believes you can fill the void in your life by recycling my rhymes with honey…

          You need to study NM00 thought before you move on to imitating NM00 speech.

          A politically correct NM00 is the saddest creature in our community…

    • andyg

      There are 3 so-called “homeruns” in the draft.

      What makes Chycrun (who may not go in the top 8-10) significantly better than Sergachev (who may not go in the top 8-10)?

      What makes Nylander (who may not go in the top 8-10) significantly better than Brown (who may not go in the top 8-10)?

      Even if Tkachuk (winger) & Dubois (converted winger) are theoretically “safer” picks, isn’t there a good chance that one or two of Keller, Jost or Brown end up as more valuable NHLers since they are pure centres?

      It’s a crapshoot from around 4-12.

      The Canucks would do well to capitalize on teams that are fixated on getting a specific player such as Montreal with Dubois or Buffalo with (probably) Juolevi.

  • DSP

    Between the guaranteed options of either Dubois, Tkachuck, or Sergachev we are getting a super solid prospect. It also assures the cost of trading up to 3rd overall wouldn’t be as extreme as you’d think, although I’d be perfectly happy to stay at 5th as well.

    Tkachuck would be a great prospect and I’m not worried about the linemates he’s had inflating his stats at all. With potential future linemates like Horvat or Boeser I’m sure his offense won’t suffer at all.

  • DSP

    Much like perry, toffoli, Allison. Tkachuk gets ragged on for his skating ability or lack thereof. But please do not let this guy slip away.He’s gonna be a beauty.

  • DSP

    Walt’s kid is seven months older than Dubois. That’s a big gap at that age. if it’s a coin toss between the two now, add seven months to Dubois’ development, and Dubois probably eclipses Tkachuk.

    Also, since Friday is a great start-a-rumour-day, hearing that Avs might considering flipping Duchene for the #5 pick. Would you do it if you are Jimbo?

  • DSP

    Yeah, his point totals are inflated, but having watched his stellar playoffs showed me that he creates a lot of opportunities of his own.

    One qualifier. Tkachuk’s not “big”. Nick Ritchie and Logan Brown are examples of “big”. Matt’s actually a tad below average NHL forward size, but he plays a solid game and battles hard. I appreciate the “sh*t disturber” aspect of his game.

    He’s unlikely to disappoint any club that selects him. But, I think that the Canucks’ long term needs are more at centre than on the wing – so I’d lean to Dubois or Brown.

  • andyg

    The only concern I have with Tkachuk is his attitude. His father was hated by teammates and was a locker room cancer (Dave Tomlinson in particular has nothing good to say about him). Dad’s teams never won and Dad showed up about 30 lbs overweight after one lockout – not exactly the best role model for junior.

    With other impressionable youngsters like Virtanen on board, the last thing the Canucks need is a very talented Prima Donna type who leads the charge to the bar after every game.

    Of course, it’s tempting to give a kid with that much talent the benefit of the doubt, but there are many very good other options available at number five. if the Canucks are as concerned about character as they seem to be, it may be wise to pass on this kid.

  • Hockey Warrior

    Grrr How many times do you HAVE TO BE TOLD Canuckleheads – Benning himself and every other decent hockey analyst has TOLD YOU that only the top three picks are going to make the NHL right away, the rest are a longer shot crapshoot, so all those salivating over a Tkachuk/Dubois/Boeser/Nylander line need to get off the koolaid because it ain’t happening and maybe never will, see!

    Secondly, YES I guarantee you that Benning is going to draft BIG KEITH’S lad at 5 (if the Coilers don’t take him) because JB wants a hard nosed player who earns his living sniffing around the net… and that’s TKACHUK. Done deal.

  • andyg

    For me I still think we should go with a defense man. Sergachyov is such an intriguing prospect. 6′ 2″ at 220 pounds. He is a high end skater with the full range of mobility.
    His interview was impressive. For a young man who came here this year and struggled with English to what you see now is amazing. His attitude also is what you want to see in an 18 year old.

    You build from goal tending out,right?