<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//thenationnetwork.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/images/9d/5f/article_9d5f5c1b-eb24-4ec5-a996-11c539051ec4.jpg" alt="USATSI_7971074_168381338_lowres (1)" width="600" height="417"> Photo Credit: Bill Streicher/USA TODAY Sports
If nothing changes between now and June 24th, the 
Vancouver Canucks will use their fifth overall selection in the 2016 NHL Entry Draft to pick one of two forwards: Cape Breton’s Pierre Luc Dubois or 
Matthew Tkachuk of the London Knights. Canucks general manager Jim Benning all 
but confirmed that it’s a two horse race on a Monday morning appearance on TSN 1040.
Speaking 
directly to Canucks fans for the first time since Saturday’s draft lottery, 
Benning revealed his thoughts on the defensemen available at the top of this year’s 
class and didn’t sound like a general manager prepared to use the fifth pick on 
a blueliner.

“Defense is so hard to come by 
now in the league – if we felt there was a true number one and we could get him 
at five, that’s where our focus would be,” Benning said. “But having said that with 
Henrik Sedin getting older now, we have to look to the future, too. If we could 
add a number one centre ice man, that’s attractive to us, too. 
&#8220;I don’t know if 
there’s a true number one defenseman. If you look through the league right now, 
there’s maybe eight or 10 number one defensemen in the whole league. This defense 
group this year, I think they’re first pairing guys where they could be a good (number) 
two. But with a number one defenseman, we’re talking about a guy with size and 
strength, who can run a power play and can match up against the other teams’ 
top lines. I don’t know if there is a true number one defenseman in this year’s 
draft.”
When pushed on whether that meant 
the Canucks were placing more value on the forwards available after the consensus 
‘Big 3’, Benning all but assured the Canucks would use the fifth pick on to 
bolster the team’s forward ranks.
“That sounds more realistic to 
me,” he said.
As for 
the draft lottery itself, Benning admitted he felt like he’d been punched in 
the gut seeing the Canucks logo revealed earlier than he had hoped. Although 
the probability had the Canucks finishing with the fifth pick despite the third 
worst record in the NHL last season, Benning was hoping to beat the odds.
As we 
now know, that didn’t happen.
&#8220;I’m 
not going to lie, I was disappointed,” he said. “When you go through a season like we just had, you 
kind of end up in that three hole for whatever reason you think well we’re not 
going to pick any worse than three. So when that came up at five, I was disappointed. 
But we’re going to get a real good player at five. We’re going to get a 
foundational piece to our team that will be a piece of the puzzle moving 
forward. 
&#8220;When the dust settles, it doesn’t sting as much, but I’ve got to say that 
night it stung.”
Knowing 
that he holds the fifth pick in the first round allows Benning to get down to the 
business of preparing a plan of attack leading into the draft. With much work 
still to do to get the Canucks back on track, Benning can leave no stone unturned 
in an effort to improve the hockey club. To that end, he says he’ll make the 
necessary phone calls to his fellow managers around the league to gauge 
interest in cooking up a deal – either to move up (although moving into the top 
three seems highly unlikely, leaving Edmonton in the four hole as his only 
likely trading partner in that regard) or to move down.
“We’re going to look at all of 
our possibilities,” he said. “Now, we know where we’re picking. I’m going to 
talk to other teams about moving up if we can or if we feel we can move down 
and add a piece to our team right now. If we think we can get a similar player 
there as we get at five, we’re going to have those conversations and look at 
that.”
Regardless of 
where the Canucks wind up selecting on June 24th, one thing is 
clear: this is a pivotal pick for the hockey club and Benning must come away 
from the podium with a player who can help the Canucks for years to come. 
Hired 
for his ability to assess junior talent, Benning is now under the gun to ensure 
the Canucks maximize the return on a terribly disappointing season. As much as 
he loves the draft and the work that goes into it, Benning doesn’t want to be 
in this position often.
“We understand we have work to do 
around here,” he said when asked about the significance of a top five pick. “We 
want to be competitive; we want to try to be a playoff team every year. Things 
didn’t work out like that for us this year, so we pick high and we have to make 
sure we pick the right player so going forward that player is a big part of our 
future. 
&#8220;Having the fifth pick in the draft and we’re going to pick high in the 
second round, so we’re going to add two more good, young players to this mix we’ve 
got going now. So it’s going to be exciting for our fan base. We’re getting 
depth in our prospect pool and that will be exciting because we’ll have all 
these kids growing up together and competing for spots and it’s going to make 
our team stronger moving forward.”
As is 
stands right now, the Canucks hold the fifth and 33rd picks in the 
draft. But things can change. When asked if there was any chance the Canucks 
would look to add a second pick later in the first round, Benning pulled back 
the curtain slightly on his thoughts about the back half of the first round. 
If the Canucks take a forward 
with their first pick, it’s almost a certainty they’d address the blueline with 
an additional first round selection. Although Benning didn’t name names, a pair 
of BC Hockey League defensemen – Dante Fabbro and Dennis Cholowski – would 
likely be available.
“We like some players in around 
20 in the draft,” he said. “We’re going to talk to teams. If they would move 
that pick, we’re going to make those calls and figure it out if we can.
On other topics:
Benning on North Dakota forward Drake Caggiula
“He did a 10 team tour. He went through and spent time with 
10 teams and heard their pitches and go to know the different general managers and 
coaches and organizations in the league. I thought we had a really good visit 
with him. We have Troy Stecher and we have Brock Boeser who was his linemate this 
year and they had really good chemistry together. When we asked him on a 
timeline, he’s going to try to decide what he’s going to do by this weekend and 
we hope he chooses us.”
Benning on signing Quinnipiac goalie Michael Garteig last 
week
“He’s from Prince George. He’s a BC kid. When I talked to 
him after we signed him, he was so excited to sign with the Canucks and be part 
of our group going forward. He’s had a real good college career. He’s got good 
size and covers a lot of net. Now, with Mike and Thatcher Demko, we have some 
depth at the goal position and we have to concentrate on adding some good young 
defensemen to our prospect pool.” 
Benning on the Canucks plans for unrestricted free agency 
this summer
“If we can add a piece to our group that makes sense, we’re 
going to be aggressive. It depends on the money. If it’s a big piece, the 
player will cost a lot of money. If it’s a secondary piece, then we could add a 
couple of pieces. But we have conversations internally still to have. We’d like 
to add to make our team competitive again next season.”
Benning on where talks stand with pending UFA Dan Hamhuis
“We just finished meeting with our coaches last week. We 
have our pro scouting meetings coming up in the next month. We’re going to go 
through all of the free agents. In the meantime, we’re going to stay in contact 
with Dan’s representative. When we figure out what makes sense for him and us, 
we’re going to have those conversations to try to get him signed.”
Benning on Ryan Miller
“He’s part of our plans for next year. He’s going to be a 
mentor to Jacob (Markstrom) again. I’m looking forward to hopefully strengthening 
our team and having a good season next year and Ryan’s going to be a part of 
that group.”

<img src="//thenationnetwork.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/images/9d/5f/article_9d5f5c1b-eb24-4ec5-a996-11c539051ec4.jpg" alt="USATSI_7971074_168381338_lowres (1)" width="600" height="417"> Photo Credit: Bill Streicher/USA TODAY SportsIf nothing changes between now and June 24th, the
Vancouver Canucks will use their fifth overall selection in the 2016 NHL Entry Draft to pick one of two forwards: Cape Breton’s Pierre Luc Dubois or
Matthew Tkachuk of the London Knights. Canucks general manager Jim Benning all
but confirmed that it’s a two horse race on a Monday morning appearance on TSN 1040.Speaking
directly to Canucks fans for the first time since Saturday’s draft lottery,
Benning revealed his thoughts on the defensemen available at the top of this year’s
class and didn’t sound like a general manager prepared to use the fifth pick on
a blueliner.“Defense is so hard to come by
now in the league – if we felt there was a true number one and we could get him
at five, that’s where our focus would be,” Benning said. “But having said that with
Henrik Sedin getting older now, we have to look to the future, too. If we could
add a number one centre ice man, that’s attractive to us, too. "I don’t know if
there’s a true number one defenseman. If you look through the league right now,
there’s maybe eight or 10 number one defensemen in the whole league. This defense
group this year, I think they’re first pairing guys where they could be a good (number)
two. But with a number one defenseman, we’re talking about a guy with size and
strength, who can run a power play and can match up against the other teams’
top lines. I don’t know if there is a true number one defenseman in this year’s
draft.”When pushed on whether that meant
the Canucks were placing more value on the forwards available after the consensus
‘Big 3’, Benning all but assured the Canucks would use the fifth pick on to
bolster the team’s forward ranks.“That sounds more realistic to
me,” he said.As for
the draft lottery itself, Benning admitted he felt like he’d been punched in
the gut seeing the Canucks logo revealed earlier than he had hoped. Although
the probability had the Canucks finishing with the fifth pick despite the third
worst record in the NHL last season, Benning was hoping to beat the odds.As we
now know, that didn’t happen."I’m
not going to lie, I was disappointed,” he said. “When you go through a season like we just had, you
kind of end up in that three hole for whatever reason you think well we’re not
going to pick any worse than three. So when that came up at five, I was disappointed.
But we’re going to get a real good player at five. We’re going to get a
foundational piece to our team that will be a piece of the puzzle moving
forward. "When the dust settles, it doesn’t sting as much, but I’ve got to say that
night it stung.”Knowing
that he holds the fifth pick in the first round allows Benning to get down to the
business of preparing a plan of attack leading into the draft. With much work
still to do to get the Canucks back on track, Benning can leave no stone unturned
in an effort to improve the hockey club. To that end, he says he’ll make the
necessary phone calls to his fellow managers around the league to gauge
interest in cooking up a deal – either to move up (although moving into the top
three seems highly unlikely, leaving Edmonton in the four hole as his only
likely trading partner in that regard) or to move down.“We’re going to look at all of
our possibilities,” he said. “Now, we know where we’re picking. I’m going to
talk to other teams about moving up if we can or if we feel we can move down
and add a piece to our team right now. If we think we can get a similar player
there as we get at five, we’re going to have those conversations and look at
that.”Regardless of
where the Canucks wind up selecting on June 24th, one thing is
clear: this is a pivotal pick for the hockey club and Benning must come away
from the podium with a player who can help the Canucks for years to come. Hired
for his ability to assess junior talent, Benning is now under the gun to ensure
the Canucks maximize the return on a terribly disappointing season. As much as
he loves the draft and the work that goes into it, Benning doesn’t want to be
in this position often.“We understand we have work to do
around here,” he said when asked about the significance of a top five pick. “We
want to be competitive; we want to try to be a playoff team every year. Things
didn’t work out like that for us this year, so we pick high and we have to make
sure we pick the right player so going forward that player is a big part of our
future. "Having the fifth pick in the draft and we’re going to pick high in the
second round, so we’re going to add two more good, young players to this mix we’ve
got going now. So it’s going to be exciting for our fan base. We’re getting
depth in our prospect pool and that will be exciting because we’ll have all
these kids growing up together and competing for spots and it’s going to make
our team stronger moving forward.”As is
stands right now, the Canucks hold the fifth and 33rd picks in the
draft. But things can change. When asked if there was any chance the Canucks
would look to add a second pick later in the first round, Benning pulled back
the curtain slightly on his thoughts about the back half of the first round. If the Canucks take a forward
with their first pick, it’s almost a certainty they’d address the blueline with
an additional first round selection. Although Benning didn’t name names, a pair
of BC Hockey League defensemen – Dante Fabbro and Dennis Cholowski – would
likely be available.“We like some players in around
20 in the draft,” he said. “We’re going to talk to teams. If they would move
that pick, we’re going to make those calls and figure it out if we can.On other topics:Benning on North Dakota forward Drake Caggiula“He did a 10 team tour. He went through and spent time with
10 teams and heard their pitches and go to know the different general managers and
coaches and organizations in the league. I thought we had a really good visit
with him. We have Troy Stecher and we have Brock Boeser who was his linemate this
year and they had really good chemistry together. When we asked him on a
timeline, he’s going to try to decide what he’s going to do by this weekend and
we hope he chooses us.”Benning on signing Quinnipiac goalie Michael Garteig last
week“He’s from Prince George. He’s a BC kid. When I talked to
him after we signed him, he was so excited to sign with the Canucks and be part
of our group going forward. He’s had a real good college career. He’s got good
size and covers a lot of net. Now, with Mike and Thatcher Demko, we have some
depth at the goal position and we have to concentrate on adding some good young
defensemen to our prospect pool.” Benning on the Canucks plans for unrestricted free agency
this summer“If we can add a piece to our group that makes sense, we’re
going to be aggressive. It depends on the money. If it’s a big piece, the
player will cost a lot of money. If it’s a secondary piece, then we could add a
couple of pieces. But we have conversations internally still to have. We’d like
to add to make our team competitive again next season.”Benning on where talks stand with pending UFA Dan Hamhuis“We just finished meeting with our coaches last week. We
have our pro scouting meetings coming up in the next month. We’re going to go
through all of the free agents. In the meantime, we’re going to stay in contact
with Dan’s representative. When we figure out what makes sense for him and us,
we’re going to have those conversations to try to get him signed.”Benning on Ryan Miller“He’s part of our plans for next year. He’s going to be a
mentor to Jacob (Markstrom) again. I’m looking forward to hopefully strengthening
our team and having a good season next year and Ryan’s going to be a part of
that group.”

Benning: picking a forward at 5 ‘Sounds realistic’

Should the Canucks trade for available Penguins wingers Bryan Rust or Rickard Rakell?

Quinn Hughes and Brock Boeser during day one of Vancouver Canucks training camp from Penticton, BC. Sep. 19, 2024

Recent articles from Jeff Paterson

Breaking News