With our intrepid editor David Quadrelli already hard at work preparing for 19 CanucksArmy postgame recaps in 31 days, Stephan Roget is here again to dip into the Monday Mailbag and fish out some compelling answers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Do you think JB really believes what he says? Real question.
&mdash; Ry G (@ridinryan44) <a href="https://twitter.com/ridinryan44/status/1381044597967609857?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
First question reads like a doozy, but is actually rather straightforward.
Jim Benning is an honest person, probably to a fault. On that alone, we know that Benning truly believes most of what comes out of his mouth. Now, obviously there are some limits to how honest one can be when running an NHL team, and so he’s been known to occasionally spin things for the public and the media to the best of his abilities — but, for better or for worse, he’s never been one to outright lie.
So, when he says he thinks the Canucks need “two or three more Tanner Pearsons,” you should believe him.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
How do we get a new GM and ownership? Which team is the best choice to turn my loyalty toward just in case it gets worse
&mdash; mike higashi (@hirokidude) <a href="https://twitter.com/hirokidude/status/1381044855745351680?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Getting a new GM is easy. Just wait.
If Benning isn’t canned after this season, he’ll be on the hottest of seats for 2021/22. Either the team rebounds in a big way, or Benning is handed his walking papers. That’s pretty much a win-win situation for anyone cheering for his departure: either you were right, and Benning is gone, or you were wrong, and the team is succeeding again.
Getting new ownership is another matter entirely. A public pressure campaign is really the only method that might work, and that’s quite difficult to pull off in a hockey-mad market. If we get to the point where season ticket sales are dropping dramatically and the base has made it clear that ownership is the reason — perhaps via a cleverly-placed billboard or two — Francesco Aquilini and Co. would have to think about selling. Until that comes to pass, they’ve got no real reason to consider parting with a profitable enterprise.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Who should the Nux protect in the expansion draft and who are Seattle likely to pick?
&mdash; DStö (@DSto2) <a href="https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381045338467790852?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This is becoming an increasingly difficult question to answer, at least up front.
The backend is easy: protect Thatcher Demko, Nate Schmidt, Olli Juolevi, and then whoever else, whether it be Tyler Myers or, ideally, a newly-acquired defender.
On offence, the Canucks will be protecting the fab four of Elias Pettersson, Brock Boeser, JT Miller, and Bo Horvat. That leaves three spots for everyone else.
Since DSto asked who the Canucks should protect, we’ll leave Tanner Pearson exposed, even though it has been reported that Benning made a handshake deal to protect him.
We’ll also remove Jake Virtanen for consideration for obvious reasons.
The decision comes down to three spots shared between Tyler Motte, Adam Gaudette, Zack MacEwen, Kole Lind, and Jonah Gadjovich. The latter two’s performances in Utica certainly change the situation. How can you give away a potential 3C or a goal-per-game AHL scorer?
As of right now, I’d protect Gaudette, Lind, and Gadjovich, but my answer could change tomorrow.
I think Seattle definitely takes one of the two left over.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
What do you think the Nux starting lineup will be next season?
&mdash; DStö (@DSto2) <a href="https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381045577136308226?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I think I’ll actually make a whole article out of this post-Trade Deadline, but here’s a quick draft:
Miller-Pettersson-Boeser
Pearson-Horvat-Höglander
Gaudette-Sutter-Podkolzin
Gadjovich-Lind-MacEwen
Roussel
Hughes-Hamonic
Juolevi-Schmidt
Rathbone-Myers
Edler
Demko-Holtby
Please note this is my expected lineup, not my preferred.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Who are your top five choices for the Nux first round draft pick, especially given that it looks like it will be at least a top 10 pick, maybe better, maybe much, much better?
&mdash; DStö (@DSto2) <a href="https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381046231481257986?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
If we’re talking the Canucks having their choice of any player in the draft — an outcome I’m nowhere near optimistic enough to think will actually come to pass — I’d have a top-five that goes something like:
Owen Power
Brandt Clarke
Luke Hughes
Matthew Beniers
Kent Johnson
Keep in mind, that’s anything but an expert opinion.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
How many Pearsons will it take to ice a competitive team?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/seaofpearsons?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#seaofpearsons</a>
&mdash; A Sea Of Pearsons (@DanielDAmour) <a href="https://twitter.com/DanielDAmour/status/1381046267287990273?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
How many ya got?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
What would be your ideal type of hockey player to be on the wing with Petey to fit his style?
Who would fit that mold currently? (NHL or other leagues)
&mdash; Ryan (@HockeyHugs10) <a href="https://twitter.com/HockeyHugs10/status/1381048364918185987?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I talked about this last week on the AvidDiscussers podcast with Joshua Rey, and the answer is still Brock Boeser, which shouldn’t be too much of a surprise. Boeser is an instinctual goal-scorer who can get himself in the right place to receive one of Pettersson’s unconventional setups, and his own underrated playmaking game ensures that Pettersson gets plenty of opportunities to unleash his own wicked shot.
Honestly, JT Miller falls into a similar category, because Pettersson is no one-trick pony.
He’s a multifaceted superstar that needs other well-rounded talents around him to succeed.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
How is Quads as a boss and when does King Faber sleep
&mdash; Patrick Johnston (@risingaction) <a href="https://twitter.com/risingaction/status/1381056389661872136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Local celebrity cameo alert!
Genuinely thrilled that Patrick wrote in.
Quads is an excellent boss when he’s not cutting my perfectly reasonable Fantastic Four references for space/to not weird out all the normies too much. I don’t think I’ve had an editor give me this much feedback since my days with the hardcases at Cracked, but he always delivers it with kindness, compassion, and positivity. Publicly, he’s a wonderful hype-man who makes great efforts to promote not just his own writers, but anyone trying to make it in this market. ‘A+’ all around.
I think Faber has evolved beyond the need for sleep. Now, he’s more GIF than man; fueled almost entirely by pure, uncut Canuck prospect content. That’s why he’s been the leader of the #FreePodz movement all season long: he needs those Podkolzin highlights to sustain himself!
(In all seriousness, Chris and I started out here at around the same time, and it’s been awesome to see him become widely recognized as a leading expert in Vancouver prospects and one of the hardest-working people in the market. Couldn’t happen to a friendlier guy!)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Whether or not you would continue to deploy him thusly, would you agree that Miller is one of the Nux 3 best centres?
&mdash; DStö (@DSto2) <a href="https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381057281412849665?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
For sure! And I’d say there’s a good chance that Miller lines up as a center in 2021/22 at least as frequently as he did in 2021.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Are there any obvious candidates to replace Benning this summer?
&mdash; Bill Huan (@bill_huan) <a href="https://twitter.com/bill_huan/status/1381057328787546116?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This is a really tough one from friend of the show Bill, because who really knows what goes on behind the scenes of other NHL organizations?
We’ve all heard names like Mike Futa and Chris Drury thrown around. Mike Gillis deserves another shot somewhere, though it won’t be in Vancouver.
But I think it’s probably best to avoid hiring a “name” candidate and instead try to poach someone from within a successful franchise that might not get the credit they deserve.
Eric Tulsky is an analytics genius who has done wonders for the Carolina Hurricanes and will be an NHL GM at some point. He&#8217;d bring that calculated efficiency that many fans have been craving.
Chris MacFarland, meanwhile, has guided rookie GM Joe Sakic into building a true contender in Colorado. He seems primed for poaching.
Either would be my pick at this juncture.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Think Mikey gunna play a game this season with the insane schedule?
&mdash; Cal Buttercluck (@CalButtercluck) <a href="https://twitter.com/CalButtercluck/status/1381080932220764164?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Assuming we’re not still talking about Gillis, I’d say yes, there’s a good chance that Mike DiPietro finally suits up for the Canucks this season.
With 19 games in 31 days, load management is going to be key. Veterans like Alex Edler should be kept out of the occasional game whether injured or not, and the Canucks will have to make liberal use of their taxi squad. Said management will also include dressing Braden Holtby for a lot more games than Travis Green was planning to down the stretch.
With DiPietro exempt from waivers, it shouldn’t be much of an issue to recall him and have him start the odd game, giving both Demko and Holtby a rest, and perhaps even upgrading the Canucks’ chances of winning in the process.
That’s to say nothing of potential injuries, which are almost guaranteed to occur at such a breakneck pace. The whole damn taxi squad is gonna play, and then some.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Is there a reason the Canucks still haven’t hired a Prez of Hockey Ops? I’d say keep GMJB due to his draft record but give him some help with the negotiations and signings. Jim Rutherford is without work and he’s been to the top and knows how to win.
&mdash; Norman Iglesias (@niglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/niglesias/status/1381081738135265280?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I think this is a great failure of the Benning era. To most observers, Benning has always lacked oversight and a “sober second thought,” and that’s usually the role of the President of Hockey Operations.
Why? I have no idea, other than that the Trevor Linden experiment ended so bitterly it might have scared Aquilini off of presidents for the foreseeable future.
I will say a stern “no thanks” to Jim Rutherford, though. The last thing Benning needs is another old boy from the club whispering in his ear.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
Who would win the Canucks all-time Napoleon contest between Bobby Lalonde, Gary Lupul, Steve Kariya and Nils Hoglander?
&mdash; Ten Zowie (@TenZowie) <a href="https://twitter.com/TenZowie/status/1381114555854581762?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Obligatory mention that Napoleon Bonaparte wasn’t actually short, he was of roughly average height for his era. Then again, that actually works pretty well as a reference for hockey players, where someone 5’9” is considered a “short king.”
At this point, you’d have to give the honours to Bobby Lalonde. With that said, there’s nothing on Lalonde’s résumé that’s out of reach for Nils Höglander in the near future, so watch this space!

With our intrepid editor David Quadrelli already hard at work preparing for 19 CanucksArmy postgame recaps in 31 days, Stephan Roget is here again to dip into the Monday Mailbag and fish out some compelling answers.

https://twitter.com/ridinryan44/status/1381044597967609857

First question reads like a doozy, but is actually rather straightforward.

Jim Benning is an honest person, probably to a fault. On that alone, we know that Benning truly believes most of what comes out of his mouth. Now, obviously there are some limits to how honest one can be when running an NHL team, and so he’s been known to occasionally spin things for the public and the media to the best of his abilities — but, for better or for worse, he’s never been one to outright lie.

So, when he says he thinks the Canucks need “two or three more Tanner Pearsons,” you should believe him.

https://twitter.com/hirokidude/status/1381044855745351680

Getting a new GM is easy. Just wait.

If Benning isn’t canned after this season, he’ll be on the hottest of seats for 2021/22. Either the team rebounds in a big way, or Benning is handed his walking papers. That’s pretty much a win-win situation for anyone cheering for his departure: either you were right, and Benning is gone, or you were wrong, and the team is succeeding again.

Getting new ownership is another matter entirely. A public pressure campaign is really the only method that might work, and that’s quite difficult to pull off in a hockey-mad market. If we get to the point where season ticket sales are dropping dramatically and the base has made it clear that ownership is the reason — perhaps via a cleverly-placed billboard or two — Francesco Aquilini and Co. would have to think about selling. Until that comes to pass, they’ve got no real reason to consider parting with a profitable enterprise.

https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381045338467790852

This is becoming an increasingly difficult question to answer, at least up front.

The backend is easy: protect Thatcher Demko, Nate Schmidt, Olli Juolevi, and then whoever else, whether it be Tyler Myers or, ideally, a newly-acquired defender.

On offence, the Canucks will be protecting the fab four of Elias Pettersson, Brock Boeser, JT Miller, and Bo Horvat. That leaves three spots for everyone else.

Since DSto asked who the Canucks should protect, we’ll leave Tanner Pearson exposed, even though it has been reported that Benning made a handshake deal to protect him.

We’ll also remove Jake Virtanen for consideration for obvious reasons.

The decision comes down to three spots shared between Tyler Motte, Adam Gaudette, Zack MacEwen, Kole Lind, and Jonah Gadjovich. The latter two’s performances in Utica certainly change the situation. How can you give away a potential 3C or a goal-per-game AHL scorer?

As of right now, I’d protect Gaudette, Lind, and Gadjovich, but my answer could change tomorrow.

I think Seattle definitely takes one of the two left over.

https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381045577136308226

I think I’ll actually make a whole article out of this post-Trade Deadline, but here’s a quick draft:

Miller-Pettersson-Boeser

Pearson-Horvat-Höglander

Gaudette-Sutter-Podkolzin

Gadjovich-Lind-MacEwen

Roussel

Hughes-Hamonic

Juolevi-Schmidt

Rathbone-Myers

Edler

Demko-Holtby

Please note this is my expected lineup, not my preferred.

https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381046231481257986

If we’re talking the Canucks having their choice of any player in the draft — an outcome I’m nowhere near optimistic enough to think will actually come to pass — I’d have a top-five that goes something like:

Owen Power

Brandt Clarke

Luke Hughes

Matthew Beniers

Kent Johnson

Keep in mind, that’s anything but an expert opinion.

https://twitter.com/DanielDAmour/status/1381046267287990273

How many ya got?

https://twitter.com/HockeyHugs10/status/1381048364918185987

I talked about this last week on the AvidDiscussers podcast with Joshua Rey, and the answer is still Brock Boeser, which shouldn’t be too much of a surprise. Boeser is an instinctual goal-scorer who can get himself in the right place to receive one of Pettersson’s unconventional setups, and his own underrated playmaking game ensures that Pettersson gets plenty of opportunities to unleash his own wicked shot.

Honestly, JT Miller falls into a similar category, because Pettersson is no one-trick pony.

He’s a multifaceted superstar that needs other well-rounded talents around him to succeed.

https://twitter.com/risingaction/status/1381056389661872136

Local celebrity cameo alert!

Genuinely thrilled that Patrick wrote in.

Quads is an excellent boss when he’s not cutting my perfectly reasonable Fantastic Four references for space/to not weird out all the normies too much. I don’t think I’ve had an editor give me this much feedback since my days with the hardcases at Cracked, but he always delivers it with kindness, compassion, and positivity. Publicly, he’s a wonderful hype-man who makes great efforts to promote not just his own writers, but anyone trying to make it in this market. ‘A+’ all around.

I think Faber has evolved beyond the need for sleep. Now, he’s more GIF than man; fueled almost entirely by pure, uncut Canuck prospect content. That’s why he’s been the leader of the #FreePodz movement all season long: he needs those Podkolzin highlights to sustain himself!

(In all seriousness, Chris and I started out here at around the same time, and it’s been awesome to see him become widely recognized as a leading expert in Vancouver prospects and one of the hardest-working people in the market. Couldn’t happen to a friendlier guy!)

https://twitter.com/DSto2/status/1381057281412849665

For sure! And I’d say there’s a good chance that Miller lines up as a center in 2021/22 at least as frequently as he did in 2021.

https://twitter.com/bill_huan/status/1381057328787546116

This is a really tough one from friend of the show Bill, because who really knows what goes on behind the scenes of other NHL organizations?

We’ve all heard names like Mike Futa and Chris Drury thrown around. Mike Gillis deserves another shot somewhere, though it won’t be in Vancouver.

But I think it’s probably best to avoid hiring a “name” candidate and instead try to poach someone from within a successful franchise that might not get the credit they deserve.

Eric Tulsky is an analytics genius who has done wonders for the Carolina Hurricanes and will be an NHL GM at some point. He'd bring that calculated efficiency that many fans have been craving.

Chris MacFarland, meanwhile, has guided rookie GM Joe Sakic into building a true contender in Colorado. He seems primed for poaching.

Either would be my pick at this juncture.

https://twitter.com/CalButtercluck/status/1381080932220764164

Assuming we’re not still talking about Gillis, I’d say yes, there’s a good chance that Mike DiPietro finally suits up for the Canucks this season.

With 19 games in 31 days, load management is going to be key. Veterans like Alex Edler should be kept out of the occasional game whether injured or not, and the Canucks will have to make liberal use of their taxi squad. Said management will also include dressing Braden Holtby for a lot more games than Travis Green was planning to down the stretch.

With DiPietro exempt from waivers, it shouldn’t be much of an issue to recall him and have him start the odd game, giving both Demko and Holtby a rest, and perhaps even upgrading the Canucks’ chances of winning in the process.

That’s to say nothing of potential injuries, which are almost guaranteed to occur at such a breakneck pace. The whole damn taxi squad is gonna play, and then some.

https://twitter.com/niglesias/status/1381081738135265280

I think this is a great failure of the Benning era. To most observers, Benning has always lacked oversight and a “sober second thought,” and that’s usually the role of the President of Hockey Operations.

Why? I have no idea, other than that the Trevor Linden experiment ended so bitterly it might have scared Aquilini off of presidents for the foreseeable future.

I will say a stern “no thanks” to Jim Rutherford, though. The last thing Benning needs is another old boy from the club whispering in his ear.

https://twitter.com/TenZowie/status/1381114555854581762

Obligatory mention that Napoleon Bonaparte wasn’t actually short, he was of roughly average height for his era. Then again, that actually works pretty well as a reference for hockey players, where someone 5’9” is considered a “short king.”

At this point, you’d have to give the honours to Bobby Lalonde. With that said, there’s nothing on Lalonde’s résumé that’s out of reach for Nils Höglander in the near future, so watch this space!

Monday Mailbag: A new GM, a new owner, and a new perspective on the Expansion Draft

Recent articles from Stephan Roget

Breaking News