I work with a few numbers to judge goaltenders, usually in the modern era dealing with even strength save percentage, quality starts and blow-ups, looking for the right balance of overall value and consistency.
There is a bit of an issue with doing that over a year-to-year span, however. NHL save percentages have crept up since 1984 when the league started recording shots on goal, with better goaltending and better overall defensive schemes, keeping goals off the board.
So how can we stack Roberto Luongo up against his Canuck kin? Not by overall save percentage, since Kirk McLean’s .901 in 1992 is probably much more impressive than Dan Cloutier’s .901 a few years later. Luongo owns six of the top seven save percentage seasons in franchise history, with Cloutier’s 2004 mark coming the closest to him.
Our friend Bruce Arthur at the National Post has suggested over Twitter several times about the prospect of coming up with an “era adjusted save percentage” statistic mirroring OPS+ in baseball, but I’d like to go a little further. What I really want to know when judging a goalie is “how valuable was he,” as in, “how many goals did he save the club?”
For giggles, I adjusted save percentage for every Canuck goalie since 1984 by year. The adjustment was simple, like the OPS+ formula, for SV%+, it was ( [ save percentage / { league combined save percentage } ] – 10% ) so the average goaltender would have a .900 save percentage.
Here are the 15 seasons where a Canuck goalie who faced 1000 shots was better than league average:


This tells us two things and doesn’t tell us another. It tells us that the Canucks have had very lame goaltending throughout their history and that Roberto Luongo was definitely the best. It doesn’t tell us how many goals a goalie prevented.
For that I turn to something I’m developing I call “SOAG” which is “saves over average goaltender”. It tells us the value of a goalie, by calculating how many saves he made compared to what an average league goalie would make: (  goaltender saves – [ league combined save percentage x goaltender shots faced ] ). It’s simple because it adjusts for both era and for the number of shots faced.
Look at Cloutier from ’04 and McLean from ’95. Since Cloutier had a longer season to work with, he would up making nearly 400 more stops than McLean, saving an extra number of goals. Similarly, Luongo from 2010 was probably more valuable to the Canucks than Cloutier’s ’04 because he had to make more saves.
I generally work with this for even strength save percentage alone, but those only go back to 2002, so we’ll have to do. Here are the ten best seasons by a Canuck goaltender for SOAG:


Not surprisingly, Luongo’s two Vezina-nominated years score very highly. I don’t know who Wendell Young is, but he had a .929 SV%+ in 1989 and having faced 536 shots, that was enough to give him 13.5 goals saved versus the league average that season.
Also, concerns about Cory Schneider tending the Vancouver net? Put them to rest. He has improved every year, with his SV%+ going from .865 to .905 to .917 to .925. He’s also second in team history:


Combine the numbers, and, since 1984 when shots began being counted, the Canucks have allowed 116.5 extra goals compared to league average goaltenders. Yet since the lockout, they’re 129.0 above. Kirk McLean’s low number is compounded by his final three years in Vancouver, which were awful. From 1996-98, he cost the team 64.3 goals.
Also, don’t worry, Wendell Young never really panned out as a journeyman backup. He had a good first season (and was also strong in 1994 with Tampa Bay) but he was pretty league average for most of his career, including his second year with the Canucks. Steve Weeks was also a journeyman who had a real strong 1989 season and nothing else in his career.
So, I hope some of this was illuminating. Draw from this what you will, be I’m pretty fine with knowing that the team is in good hands when Schneider takes over as the starter next season. I just don’t see Luongo staying after what he’s been put through in the last two weeks.
Player 
Season 
NHL SV%
SA 
SV 
SV%+
Roberto Luongo
2006-07
0.905
2169
1998
0.918
Roberto Luongo
2010-11
0.913
1753
1627
0.917
Kirk McLean
1991-92
0.888
1780
1604
0.915
Kirk McLean
1988-89
0.879
1169
1042
0.914
Roberto Luongo
2008-09
0.908
1542
1418
0.913
Roberto Luongo
2007-08
0.909
2029
1861
0.909
Roberto Luongo
2011-12
0.914
1577
1450
0.906
Corey Hirsch
1995-96
0.898
1173
1059
0.905
Kirk McLean
1994-95
0.901
1140
1031
0.904
Dan Cloutier
2003-04
0.911
1554
1420
0.903
Roberto Luongo
2009-10
0.911
1915
1748
0.902
Alex Auld
2005-06
0.901
1938
1749
0.902
Kirk McLean
1992-93
0.885
1615
1431
0.901
Kirk McLean
1989-90
0.880
1804
1588
0.900
Richard Brodeur
1984-85
0.855
1574
1346
0.900
Player 
Season 
NHL SV%
SA 
SV 
SOAG
Roberto Luongo
2006-07
0.905
2169
1998
35.1
Roberto Luongo
2010-11
0.913
1753
1627
26.5
Kirk McLean
1991-92
0.888
1780
1604
23.4
Cory Schneider
2011-12
0.914
945
885
21.3
Roberto Luongo
2008-09
0.908
1542
1418
17.9
Roberto Luongo
2007-08
0.909
2029
1861
16.6
Kirk McLean
1988-89
0.879
1169
1042
14.4
Wendell Young
1985-86
0.861
536
475
13.5
Steve Weeks
1988-89
0.879
953
851
13.3
Cory Schneider
2010-11
0.913
714
663
11.1
Player
SOAG
Roberto Luongo
108.1
Cory Schneider
27.5
Alex Auld
10.9
Steve Weeks
9.7
Wendell Young
7.2
Jason LaBarbera
1.6
Arturs Irbe
1.3
Dany Sabourin
0.3
Tyler Moss
0.3
Andrew Raycroft
0.0
Maxime Ouellet
-0.8
Drew MacIntyre
-1.0
Mike Fountain
-1.0
Steve McKichan
-1.1
Alfie Michaud
-2.4
Mika Noronen
-2.4
Curtis Sanford
-4.3
Corey Schwab
-5.0
Johan Hedberg
-5.1
Martin Brochu
-5.4
Peter Skudra
-6.8
Bob Mason
-7.6
Richard Brodeur
-7.6
Bob Essensa
-9.2
Sean Burke
-11.8
Felix Potvin
-12.4
Dan Cloutier
-13.0
Kevin Weekes
-13.1
Corey Hirsch
-15.5
Garth Snow
-16.2
Troy Gamble
-19.3
Frank Caprice
-21.1
John Garrett
-21.7
Kay Whitmore
-28.7
Kirk McLean
-50.9