logo

The Big Reveal: Our Staff’s Individual Prospect Rankings

Dimitri Filipovic
10 years ago
alt
"Oh, they finally revealed their individual lists?"
Image via Justin K. Aller/Getty Images.
One of my biggest pet peeves in sports is the fact that the voting for awards isn’t made public after the fact. I don’t know about you, but I’d take it much more seriously if I knew who was voting for what. If you’re going to have the right to vote, you should disclose it, own up to it, and face the music (which sounds an awful lot like the inevitable wrath of fans that don’t agree with you). So, for the sake of transparency, we’re releasing our individual rankings for all to see.
I know, I know, it’s long overdue. After all, our series concluded nearly two weeks ago. The plan was to actually hold off on disclosing them until Corey Pronman released his Top 10 for the Canucks. But we couldn’t wait any longer. Without further ado, they’re being presented to you on the other side of the jump.
The 5 rankers involved (Thomas DranceCam CharronJeff AngusPatrick Johnston, and myself) were essentially asked to put together their individual Top 20. Then, we combined all of the results into an aggregate score. In the case of a tie between two prospects, we put the player with the single highest ranking ahead (ex. Gaunce and Corrado technically both had the same aggregate score, but Cam’s #1 ranking of Gaunce put him ahead of Corrado, whose highest individual rank was #2, on our overall list). By that logic, shouldn’t Peter Andersson should have finished ahead of Sauve and Cassels, though? I guess so. But 3 of our 5 rankers didn’t even rank Andersson, which he was penalized for.
ProspectDimitriThomasCamJeffPatrickAggregate
Brendan Gaunce331342.8
Frank Corrado222532.8
Bo Horvat414153
Nicklas Jensen553223.4
Hunter Shinkaruk146464.2
Eddie Lack675615
Jordan Subban86811139.2
Joseph LaBate9898149.6
Henrik Tommernes1011771710.4
Kellan Lain7NR1010811.2
Joacim Eriksson15101291011.2
Alexandre Grenier11916121612.8
Alexandre Mallet131914141515
Darren Archibald141218NR1115.2
Patrick McNally12201513NR16.2
Joe Cannata17NR1916916.4
Yann Sauve16181120NR17.2
Cole Cassels1915NR191217.2
Peter AnderssonNR16NRNR717.2
Alex Friesen18NR13181917.8
 Also Receiving Votes:
ProspectDimitriThomasCamJeffPatrickAggregate
Anton Cederholm2014NR17NR18.6
Evan McEnenyNRNR20152019.4
Adam PolasekNR1717NRNR19.4
Ben HuttonNR13NRNRNR19.4
Ludwig BlomstrandNRNRNRNR1820.4
I’m sure there’s certain rankings that each of us would like to have back, and amend, but I can only speak for myself. I’d like to make the following changes to my personal list:
  • I’m already on the record as saying that were I to redo my list, I’d have Blomstrand somewhere in the range of a Yann Sauve (16th). In fact, now that I think about it, I would probably just swap the two.
  • I’d also probably move Kellan Lain down a few spots. I don’t remember having him as high as I apparently did, but I guess I was drinking the kool aid at the time. 
  • I don’t put too much stock into something like the Young Stars Classic, and I often see people far too quick to jump to conclusions based off of its small samples. But one guy whose play did change my mind was Cole Cassels, a player I was initially skeptical of. However, after having watched him in Penticton, I’d feel inclined to bump him up a few spots. I was really impressed by his overall game. As Drance mentioned in his profile of him, he could be in line for a much bigger role in Oshawa, and certainly could find himself shooting up our rankings come next summer.
  • The biggest riser is Joacim Eriksson, who I’d probably move up into my Top 10. At the time I simply didn’t know very much about him, and obviously took a far too cautious approach in ranking him. He deserves to be neck and neck with Eddie Lack as far as I’m concerned (with a slight edge to Lack based on his performance in the AHL).
  • Bo Horvat very well could be a better prospect than Brendan Gaunce. I’m not bullish (no pun intended) on Gaunce by any means, and will openly conceed that I could certainly wind up looking foolish for having him ranked over Horvat in the near future. But I’m not necessarily sold on Horvat, either, and I think there’s a ton of recency bias with him. After all, he is the shiny new toy in Vancouver. Obviously the fact that Corey Pronman didn’t even have Gaunce in his Top 110 didn’t help matters, but I’ve got to stick by my decision. For now.
This should go without saying, but, I still feel the need to implore you to keep the comments section civil, please. Disagreeing with the rankings of any of our writers is totally fine. In fact, you should, since they were mostly subjective rankings. We always encourage thoughtful discussion and back-and-forth banter. But personal attacks and childish name-calling will not be tolerated, so don’t even bother.
With all that said, I’m looking forward to seeing what unfolds below, since I’m sure that it’ll get heated. Have at it!

Check out these posts...