Finding Milan, Part I
By Cam Charron
11 years ago
The times that we, as a blogosphere, spend searching for “the next Milan Lucic” may be better off understanding who the first Milan Lucic is. He’s a relevant topic of conversation, since he is generally the first player brought up in those insane “the Canucks need to draft more Giants” discussions.
And why not? Lucic is 6’4″, 200 lbs and a legitimate crazy person on the ice. He’s scored 56 goals over the last two seasons, hits everything that moves and fits the rugged “bull-in-a-china-shop” descriptor. But just what the heck is so valuable about Milan Lucic that makes him such a desirable, and rare, character?
For that, I think we need to look a bit more at Lucic’s history.
From BCHL Cast-Off to Prototypical NHL Powerforward
In 2003, 223 players were selected in the Western Hockey League’s Bantam Draft, and Milan Lucic was not one of them, skipped over and overlooked for various reasons. One of which, I can only assume by looking at Lucic’s progression through the years, is the belief that Lucic would never be able to skate quickly enough to be a legitimate hockey player.
Then he was cut from the Coquitlam Express of the BCHL, and used Junior B to work his way up to Junior A, and used Junior A to work his way into the WHL. In his rookie WHL season, also his draft year, he scored 9 goals in 62 games and added 10 assists, with 149 penalty minutes. The Vancouver Giants won the WHL Championship that season, but had a disappointing Memorial Cup showing, finishing third.
Then what happened? Well, he was expected to be selected at the upcoming NHL Entry draft, but not too high. McKeen’s had him ranked 82nd on their overall list behind other WHL luminaries such as Riley Holzapfel and Ondrej Fiala and Codey Burki. Why the low ranking? Hockey’s Future, a resource that essentially compiles various scouting reports via the Google machine, questioned his “commitment to fundamentals”.
It’s not that any team really passed on Lucic here. He was slotted to go sometime in the late third round or the early fourth. The Boston Bruins took a long, hard look and decided to take him with the 50th overall selection, one that surprised him. “I didn’t know they were this interested,” he told reporters.
It’s not like at any time this was a player we’d look upon as a key member of a National Hockey League team, but Peter Chiarelli disagreed when he signed him to an extension that would kick in at the 2010-11 season that would pay Milan $4M for two seasons, then $4.25M in the third year. Before that slight 250k raise kicked in, Chiarelli decided that Lucic was worth $6M per season.
And there’s the record scratch.
A Crisis of Expectation
Here’s McKeen’s writeup of Lucic from last offseason. Thanks to Gus Katsaros for sending this over:
“Rigid puck carrier, little stickhandling, more about brute strength .. seemed quicker off the mark in ’11-12 .. liked to carry it more too, rigidity aside .. showed extensions of his playmaking ability .. much improved identifying passing opportunities .. doesn’t protect the puck well while rushing, especially wide, instead relying on a bull mentality to outmuscle and strong arm defenders .. remarked how he still felt slight effects of the high ankle sprain he suffered two seasons ago ..”
And here is this season’s:
“Unable to step up in Nathan Horton’s absence – and even failed to score a single goal in a surprisingly flat playoff performance… laboured to keep the engines full throttle – in spite of dishing out a team-high 3 hits in the series – as witnessed by a careless turnover and lazy recovery – that handed Washington the opening goal in Game 7… mean, uncompromising winger generates chances with determination and strength…”
There are notes about Lucic’s improved fundamentals, particularly his skating and playmaking, but for the most part, the difference in tone between 2011 and 2012 is staggering.
I’m debating that some of this could be attributed to swings in Lucic’s PDO. PDO is the addition of save and shot percentage while a player is on the ice. Players with a number that is too high or too low can expect to regress towards 1000:
| Season | PDO |
|---|---|
| 2008 | 991 |
| 2009 | 1043 |
| 2010 | 977 |
| 2011 | 1045 |
| 2012 | 997 |
That’s the problem with Lucic. He’s a fundamentally-flawed hockey player and thus impossible to predict or replicate. He’s made his living not by the traditional skills of skating, shooting and stick handling, but through brute strength and force of will. When his percentages are high, people expect a lot more out of him than I think they should.
It’s not a flaw that Lucic was unable to step up in Nathan Horton’s absence. Nathan Horton is a fantastic hockey player. Rather, it’s a crisis of expectation.
When Lucic had a 30-goal season in 2010-2011, it went underreported that he had five empty net goals. When he scored 26 goals in 2011-2012, he was theoretically improving on his offence with less freebie production. He didn’t score a single empty-net goal (unless you count his five goals against the Toronto Maple Leafs).
This is where statistics may have a leg-up on actual viewings. If I was sitting in the stands next to you watching those 2006 Vancouver Giants and told you that Lucic would go on to have a more successful NHL career than Gilbert Brule, you would have said I was crazy. Lucic was fierce and intimidating, but he was exceptionally slow and clunky, and with his natural hunch, he looked awkward.
Yet the way he’s looked has been the reverse of how he’s translated to the NHL. He’s not the perfect hockey player and his game still has some flaws, but he’s a 25-goal scorer in consecutive years and he’s yet to play a season with a minus-possession rate.
His breed is rare, but there’s another power forward out there who is arguably better, albeit much less heralded, and won’t be as rich when the NHL season starts up again.
And coming into the fray is Zack Kassian. These are players we’ll look at over the next two weeks.
Related Articles from CanucksArmy
Recent articles from Cam Charron
