USA Hockey Announces Their Olympic Dream Team, Literally

Either way, it's a dream team.

Yes, between David Poile having a guilt-ridden dream about leaving Jack Johnson off the team, and Brian Burke waking up in a sweat over a Seth Jones turnover, it was quite the selection process. I know the US men’s basketball team has had success at the Olympics after putting together a dream team, but I don’t think this is what they had in mind…

In what was purely a PR move, USA Hockey decided to allow two reporters to sit in on the meetings and conference calls that were part of the selection process for the men’s Olympic hockey team. The stories from the two reporters "embedded" in the process, Scott Burnside for and Kevin Allen for USA Today, were to be part of a coordinated reveal on, sadly, the biggest night of the NHL season in the United States: January 1.

Yes, the bad hockey spectacle that is the Winter Classic is bigger than the Stanley Cup final. I’m not really sure why we keep lying to ourselves every New Year’s Day, but we do:

Why do we keep lying to ourselves every year?

But I digress.

How do I know that it was all a carefully orchestrated publicity stunt? Well, there’s the fact they gave access to two reporters and embargoed the stories to come out at exactly the same time. And then there’s this:

That’s right. They didn’t even give players the courtesy of letting them know they did or didn’t make the team just to create a little extra drama for television. Nice.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Sorry, but these guys deserve all the scorn they’re getting for being "taken out of context."

As was pointed out on Twitter, these guys were a bad head of hair away from turning the whole thing into a reality show:

They should have realized that when it comes to reality TV, it’s all about the editing. 

The irony in all of this, of course, is that instead of creating a lot of buzz about the Olympic team and their prospects for Sochi, it has become a story about the players that didn’t make it. Chief among them is Bobby Ryan, one of the few pure goal scorers the Americans had to choose from. In a strange twist of logic, however, this innate goal scoring ability is actually a negative quality because it was unlikely that Ryan would crack the top six. I mean, God forbid you have somebody that’s a threat to score on your fourth line, I guess.

Advertisement - Continue Commenting Below

But that wasn’t the only knock on Ryan. There were plenty of others, and the discussion about whether to include him got pretty intence intenths incense intents fierce at times:

There was intents discussion abour Bobby Ryan's abilities.

Damn. Guess I’m not cut out for the US Olympic team either.

Oh well.

I do have to say that I didn’t think the stuff about Ryan was even close to the worst thing said about a player. In a hilarious structuring of his piece on the deliberations, Kevin Allen leads into this quote on Dustin Byfuglien by Stan Bowman with an explanation that the selection committee was concerned about his sometimes ginormous proporptions:

"Guys gravitate toward him," Bowman said. "Guys like him and he can play hockey and he can play at a (weight) number that would surprise you."

That’s some (inter)stellar writing, right there!

The other interesting thing that stands out to me from the much more detailed Burnside article is that Burke came across as constantly throwing out quip after quip. Now, that’s an interesting approach, because it allows Burke to then claim that he was just joking, if and when he gets called on it. So the "nightmare" about Seth Jones coughing up the puck was clearly said in jest, but there was a real sentiment behind it. The same is true about Ryan not being able to spell "intense". Clearly Burke doesn’t really mean that, but it’s a jab at Ryan’s character and ability nonetheless.

This tactic is most apparent, and most telling, in the constant "quips", as Burnside describes them, that Burke makes about the extensive, and presumably fact based, report that Los Angeles GM, Dean Lombardi, put together on Keith Yandle:

Poile reminds those in attendance of a detailed report prepared by Lombardi looking at the bubble defensemen and specifically a case to be made for including Keith Yandle on the 25-man roster.

Glancing at the voluminous report, Burke quips, "Why don’t we read the New Testament instead?"


"You guys I totally respect," Lombardi adds, finishing his presentation. "There are some holes in [Keith Yandle’s] game, but can we afford to pass on the highest-scoring American in the last four years?"

There is some good-natured joshing of Lombardi for the report.

"I thought it was ‘Gone With The Wind,’" Burke says.


Poile jokes that he feels better knowing they’ve sent him away with a split vote on the [Jack Johnson and Cam Fowler].

"I really appreciate that four-four vote. That’s really helpful," he says and the group breaks into laughter.

"Dean, can you prepare a brief on these two defensemen," Burke jokes.

It should be noted that these anecdotes took place over successive meetings and conference calls. The net effect of these types of comments is to undermine and denigrate the fact based analysis that Lombardi put together. Sure, I wasn’t in the room, so I have no idea. But boy does it come across like Burke didn’t even read it and kept making light of it in the same way you would of something that you don’t take at all seriously.

Call it a hunch, but I think those exchanges are some of the most telling in that entire piece:

You must be on to something. Or maybe not.

Anyway, in the aftermath of the Burke quotes on Ryan, there has been much hand wringing. There was, of course, the response from Bobby Ryan:

 Then came the excuses for Burke:


Yeesh. I’d hate to see what Burke says about guys he doesn’t like. Oh, yeah.

And of course, blood is thicker than PR spin:

Yes. Being quotable is the problem. Sheesh.

At the risk of repeating myself:

Just because you're quotable, doesn't mean you should open your mouth.

Maybe Burke should have just whacked the bugger and sat down.

Inevitably, we got to the apologies, but along the way there was all kinds of inanity on Twitter, like this:

I’m just going to set aside the rather obvious problem with the second half of that tweet. But the first half got me to thinking, if we can have too much scoring on a hockey team, can we also have too much leadership and intangibles? I mean, at what point do we have, er, too many captains and not enough wingers:

Can you have too much leadership?

Anyway, the point is from a PR standpoint, this entire excercise was an abject failure. I’m pretty sure the casual hockey fan is far better able to name a few of the players that didn’t make the team than they are to name all the guys that are actually on the roster.

Or maybe this was part of Burke’s grand plan all along to take the media heat off the roster players and put it squarely on the management team and the guys that aren’t going to be there.

Either way, I have to go now. Need to make a deal to try and get Ryan on my fantasy team. I have a feeling he’s going to Samuelsson the next couple of months


By the way, if once again you’ve found yourself in January and in need of a new calendar, I would like to remind you that the Graphic Comments 2014 Wall Calendar is still available from Order one today and you’ll still get a good 90% use out of it. Plus you can tell all your hipster friends that it’s big in Europe:



  • McRib

    “Yes, between David Poile having a guilt-ridden dream about leaving Jack Johnson off the team, and Brian Burke waking up in a sweat over a Seth Jones turnover, it was quite the selection process. ”

    Do people REALLY believe that these dreams influenced the selection process? These are quotes from conference calls and meetings – is it not possible that in the hours of talking they would bring up interesting things that happened in their day (or night) just as part of the normal socializing process. It feels like this is being blown way out of proportion.

    “The net effect of these types of comments is to undermine and denigrate the fact based analysis that Lombardi put together.”

    Burke has always been sarcastic and prone to running his mouth. I’m not convinced this is anything more than him teasing Lombardi.

    Not trying to pick on you Petbugs…just have been seeing these 2 points come up numerous times from a sizable segment of bloggers on Twitter, and I just don’t get it.

    Great graphs as always. : )

    • Graphic Comments

      I mentioned that I didn’t think the dream stuff was serious, especially Burke’s Seth Jones comment. But I do think the continual teasing of Lombardi over the report was a subtle way of undermining that approach.

  • SmellOfVictory

    Still trying to figure out the point of this article even being written. Other than that Burke-bashing seems to be a mandatory requirement to write for FN nowadays.

    Seriously, how much conversation, how many words were spoken over the course of these meetings?

    But just keep focusing on a few quotes that if you read the entire article aren’t even that bad.

    Because if the FN writers were listened in on for days on end talking about assembling a team no dumb quotes would be had. Sure.

    • SmellOfVictory

      Burke bashing is fun. Also, the fact that, of all of the things said in these meetings, the sass that Burke supplied provided the great majority of the quotes from a team of half a dozen dudes or however many it is, indicates that the other guys evidently didn’t say anything particularly controversial, or say it as controversially. Sorry for the run-on sentence.

    • McRib

      Agree completely FN needs to get over this Burke bashing.

      I graduated University with a guy that is now an agent and he says Brian Burke is legitimately one of the most respected and nicest guys in the industry (to everyone except the media). When he was GM with Toronto he signed one of my buddies firms clients they are a smaller firm so it was a big deal (Firm is Top shelf if anyones interested) and all he could say was how Burke was pure class. Flying out the kids family monthly to watch him play, taking the parents to dinner before games and even though the kid moved on still kept in touch.

      It’s obvious of how respected he is in the industry when you look at some of the trades he made with Toronto… Anaheim basically gave him Jake Gardiner & Nashville gave him Cody Franson two very legitmate prospects because they didn’t need them and wanted to see them in a good situation with Burkie. Also you know James Van Riemsdyk for Luke Schenn…. If you honestly think Philly thought Schenn a stay-at-home defender was going to be as good as JVR you can thiink again… They wanted JVR to get more opportunity and gave him away to a respected GM. You know the complete opposite to what Feaster had to do to get people to trade with him… Feaster had to call people, people call Burke.

  • Reidja

    Loved the Burnside piece! And I also love the meta-reporting that it spawned… I still find these spin-off articles entertaining, if deminishingly so 🙁

    I would love to see more “FULL ACCESS!!!” articles so let’s not get too severe with damnation for the “PR” aspect. This is about a multi-billion $ entertainment industry after all.

  • McRib

    It’s interesting having met both Scott Burnside & Kevin Allen at NHL Drafts over the years and knowing people in the industry it does not suprise me that Scott Burnside “came up” with the quoteable newsworthy pieces and Kevin Allen didn’t from the USA Hockey Conference Call….

    Kevin Allen is easily regarded as one of the most respected journalists in the entire industry without a doubt the most in the USA.

    Whereas Scott Burnside is an absolute A$$ HAT!!!! These comments are sooooo cherry picked its interesting people have taken them so far, lets put it this way I would never believe anything Scott Burnside quoted. I am almost certain Burke was joking on most of these and Burnside turned them into serious comments.

    Regardless Bobby Ryan & Keith Yandle (bigger omission for me) should be on the team!! haha. But you gotta ask yourselves why did Bobby Ryan get over it so quickly…. Hears how Burke called Brian Murray and said “We were joking and Burnside turned it around on us”… “Okay thanks for clearing it up didn’t think you would say something like that”, The End.