Canucks Army Postgame: Cool Hand Lack

Dimitri Filipovic
December 20 2013 09:41PM


Eddie Lack was impressive, and the difference for the Canucks [Image via Bruce Bennett]

Ho boy.. that was fun, wasn't it? After two rather unrefined showings against the Wild and Stars, we were treated to an exhilarating affair on Friday night at the Madhouse Sadhouse on Madison. It shouldn't come as a surprise, though, because seemingly every time these two teams go up against each other, notable things happen. And this game was no different.

In the preamble of the preview I specifically pointed out that while things looked bleak for the Canucks, we shouldn't necessarily count them out since they play these games for a reason. Just like that time in St.Louis at the end of a long roadtrip they showed some impressive resiliency and fight in battling against an opponent that theoretically should have had the upper hand. I guess you could say it was gutsy, but I certainly won't. 

The result was a 3-2 shootout win, which I'll recap just past the jump..

The Rundown

Things started out in a very, very ugly fashion for the Canucks, who looked like they were skating in mud out there in the early going. Other than a Chris Higgins breakaway which was stopped, they pretty much weren't able to generate anything resembling an offensive push in the opening 20. 

Shots on goal were 10-3 in favour of the Blackhawks in the first, and quite frankly the Canucks were lucky to get out of the period trailing by just 1. Lack was very good in the adverse conditions, only being beaten by a tipped shot by Kris Versteeg which fooled him, sneaking through his pads. It was Andrew Alberts' inability to tie him up which resulted in the goal, and poor Kevin Bieksa must spend the intermissions sobbing thinking about all of the sweet memories he has with Ryan Stanton.

I don't know what happened during the intermission, but the Canucks came out of the gate following it looking like a completely different squad. They were handily in charge of the first 5 minutes or so - with two power plays back-to-back obviously not hurting their cause - but weren't able to put a goal up on the scoreboard. Then, a wizard Patrick Kane came right back down and put one in to make it 2-0. The play was filthy, and vintage Patty Kane, as he weaved through the defense before setting up Roszival for a scoring chance, before burying the rebound. I'm sure that fans watching the game were getting unfortunate flashbacks to what happened last night, when the team dominated, couldn't score, and then gave up a back-breaker.

But.. that didn't happen here. Just three minutes or so later Zack Kassian let a seemingly harmless wrister go, beating Antti Raanta. To be fair, the puck clearly re-directed off of Seabrook's leg and totally changed direction. A lucky break, no doubt.. but one that the Canucks probably deserved following their efforts to start the period:

Consolidating the goal was Lack, who made a wicked pad save on Ben Smith - who in a completely surprising turn of events, made Dan Hamhuis look like a pylon - to keep the game within 1. Looks like Lack needed every single little bit of that 6'5'' from for this one, and it'll surely wind up on a few highlight reels this weekend: 


GIF via The Score

Once again in the 3rd, the Canucks for the most part controlled play as they made a push for the tying goal. Prior to the game I tweeted out about how it would be awfully nice of the Sedins to show up with a vintage performance at 5v5 in this one, considering the fact that they'd been more than quiet over the past 10 games or so at even strength.

Well, apparently ask and you shall receive, because Daniel - who registered a game-high 7 shots on goal, by far the most for him since November 17th - buried one after another lucky bounce off of the defender. Sure, the puck getting to him was definitely fortunate, but the nifty play he made to get the puck to his stick was pretty classic. These sorts of opportunities present themselves when you spend the majority of the time with control of the puck in the opposing team's zone. It's why we pay so much attention to shot differentials, you guys..

The game wound up making its way to a shootout, where the Canucks finally won in the 8th round on a goal by Kesler. Why did 7 guys go before him, you ask? I don't really know. Maybe Tortorella is embracing how ridiculous the whole concept of the shootout is, and having some fun with how bad the team is as a whole at it. Weber, Dalpe, and both Sedins went before Kesler, which is an interesting strategy, to say the least.

After Santorelli scored to open it, 6 straight Canucks went up and went down without really even testing the Blackhawks netminder. Henrik Sedin's attempt, in particular, was feeble (even for his standards). The team is now 4-for-25 in shootout attempts on the year, but hey, it all worked out on this night.

The Numbers


Image via Extra Skater

As you can see from the chart above, the first period was some tough-sledding for the Canucks, who relied on their 'tender to bail them out. And that he did. In 5v5 "score tied" situations the shot attempts were 19-8 for the Blackhawks, and they only managed one goal during that time. Lack also stopped 7 of the 8 shootout tries he faced, including a really nice glove save on Patrick Kane which the TSN commentating team badly undersold. 

After that first, though, the Canucks really controlled play. Now, some of that can be attributed to score effects as they were playing from behind and giving it their all in an attempt to tie it up. But they also deserve a ton of credit for a legitimately impressive performance on the road, regardless.

Andrew Alberts actually finished with the best Corsi For % (53.8%), which is something you can tell your grandchildren about one day. In all seriousness though both Alberts (aside from that one play) and Weber did a better job than I personally expected. In fact, Weber probably saved the game in overtime as he thwarted Marian Hossa following a brutal turnover by Henrik. And on one occasion I distinctly noted that Alberts single-handedly snuffed out a rush by Patty Kane. Weird stuff.

One final thing that I'll mention is that, sort of unsurprisingly I guess, Tortorella really rode his top two lines in this one. The Sedins, Kesler, Higgins, and Santorelli all hovered around at least 24 minutes for the night. Hamhuis, in another cool 29 minutes of action, broke even in the shot differential game despite seeing a ton of Toews' line. How freakin' good is this guy?

The Conclusion

The Canucks go home to host the Evander Kane's posse Winnipeg Jets on Sunday evening, before getting a nice 6-day break for the Holidays. I'd like to remind you that The Shapys are on Sunday, and we'll be covering them here on this platform. If you care about that sort of thing, great, come check it out. If not.. we'll still have coverage of the game so don't you worry!

Let's end this post with a fun GIF of Roberto Luongo taking some time out from his night off to make a snazzy glove save on a puck that was headed out of play. Thanks to The Stanchion for this:

 

7482b25b962fb1661ea9028fb4e0db36
Dimitri Filipovic writes about hockey on the internet, and is the Managing Editor of Canucks Army. You can follow him on Twitter @DimFilipovic, and email him at dimitri.filipovic@gmail.com.
Avatar
#1 NM00
December 20 2013, 10:07PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Props
10
props

Nice to see the boys gut out another gutsy game.

It's the holiday season so the FenTied can be ignored.

I didn't know a toe save like the one on Smith could be made without the goalie ending up on his belly.

As such, if this organization is truly a meritocracy, Lack deserves to start on Sunday against his surrogate home town team...

Avatar
#2 James M
December 20 2013, 10:13PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props

Love the GIF at the end. Solid breakdown as usual.

Avatar
#3 PB
December 20 2013, 10:20PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
3
props

@NM00

I stand properly rebuked by your tone. You are a veritable Santa today.

Lack probably should get that start. Lu probably wouldn't mind the break.

Avatar
#4 Wetcoaster
December 20 2013, 10:28PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
8
props

Do you think the Canucks get billed for all the paint Torts' keeps peeling off the walls of the dressing rooms on road games?

Avatar
#5 Frank
December 20 2013, 11:02PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
0
props

I thought Alberts looked pretty decent tonight especially in the offensive zone where he actually had some nice chances. Good win boys! Can't wait for Burrows to get back. Edler, not so much...

Avatar
#6 BC Salmon
December 21 2013, 12:28AM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Props
2
props

This team is always built for the regular season. Come playoffs, we will fall apart like usual.

Avatar
#7 Ryan B
December 21 2013, 12:38AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
17
props
BC Salmon wrote:

This team is always built for the regular season. Come playoffs, we will fall apart like usual.

That you Tony Gallagher? You and Blake Price, er NM00, looking to take down Canuck Army from the inside?

#glassalwaysempty

Avatar
#8 Matt
December 21 2013, 01:13AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
6
props
Ryan B wrote:

That you Tony Gallagher? You and Blake Price, er NM00, looking to take down Canuck Army from the inside?

#glassalwaysempty

#dontfeedthetrolls

Avatar
#9 Ted
December 21 2013, 01:59PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
3
props

Very impressive win. They went in with their back-up; missing Edler, Burr and Stanton.

I think Torts is changing the culture of the team. AV was a tad passive while Torts is anything but. It's good to see him get involved and push. He also seems to call it like it is and might do wonders developing the young guys like Kassian and waking up Booth.

This team may also perform better in the playoffs. Only time will tell!

Avatar
#10 andyg
December 21 2013, 03:16PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

I like the fact that Torts is not picking week teams but is giving him a real chance to prove himself with grade A competition.This show us and his team mates his true potential.

This kid could be our starter in a few years.

Avatar
#11 JFR
December 21 2013, 05:27PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

I know the Canucks couldn't win them all, but the efforts in Minny and especially Dallas were weak. Being in the ultra competitive West means 2-3 game losing streaks can put you way behind. Nice wins over the Bs and Hawks, so let's hope the Canucks fans get Burrows back with the twins and Edler replacing Alberts for Xmas.

Avatar
#12 argoleas
December 22 2013, 01:06AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
2
props
NM00 wrote:

Nice to see the boys gut out another gutsy game.

It's the holiday season so the FenTied can be ignored.

I didn't know a toe save like the one on Smith could be made without the goalie ending up on his belly.

As such, if this organization is truly a meritocracy, Lack deserves to start on Sunday against his surrogate home town team...

SO the good news is that we may just have another Schneider. The bad news would be that we may just have another goalie controversy. How soon will Eriksson be ready so we can trade Lack?

Avatar
#13 van
December 22 2013, 01:39AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props

Got a bone to pick with the Hansen + Sedins detractors. The WOWYs look really good.

Henrik With/Without Hansen: This Season: 61.3 CF%, 85.7% GF%, 114 mins; 54.8 CF%, 61.8 GF%, 391 mins

09-13: 60.7 CF%, 72.7% GF%, 247 mins; 55.4 CF%, 62.8 GF%, 3380 mins

*Sample size*, but seems to be very encouraging. Just wondering where the evidence is for the Sedins not working with Hansen?

Is it just because people want to see Kassian with the Sedins?

Avatar
#14 Ryan B
December 22 2013, 03:43AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props
van wrote:

Got a bone to pick with the Hansen + Sedins detractors. The WOWYs look really good.

Henrik With/Without Hansen: This Season: 61.3 CF%, 85.7% GF%, 114 mins; 54.8 CF%, 61.8 GF%, 391 mins

09-13: 60.7 CF%, 72.7% GF%, 247 mins; 55.4 CF%, 62.8 GF%, 3380 mins

*Sample size*, but seems to be very encouraging. Just wondering where the evidence is for the Sedins not working with Hansen?

Is it just because people want to see Kassian with the Sedins?

If you're looking for rational logic from meathead Canucks fans/media, you're going to be beating yourself up.

#wholelotofChickenLittles

Avatar
#15 Ruprecht
December 22 2013, 10:10AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
argoleas wrote:

SO the good news is that we may just have another Schneider. The bad news would be that we may just have another goalie controversy. How soon will Eriksson be ready so we can trade Lack?

That's pretty much how it works when you develop goaltenders. Would you rather be like Toronto?

Avatar
#16 JFR
December 22 2013, 10:40AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
Ryan B wrote:

If you're looking for rational logic from meathead Canucks fans/media, you're going to be beating yourself up.

#wholelotofChickenLittles

I think Nucks fans would like to see Kassian play well enough to get a shot with the twins! not just be given a shot. Torts was right that Kassian doesn't play enough D to play on the 1st line. Every game you can see when the rush turns back towards the Canucks zone, Kassian is loafing back while Hanson will stop a rush with a solid back check. Bemoaning Hansen with the Twins is only because of the production they have had in the past with Burrows. AB is a more creative passer and finisher than Hansen, you don't score 41 goals by accident. AB has had a tough season, but the chances are there. I speak for a lot of Nucks fans when I say that we finally have a productive 2nd line, we just wish the 1st as productive as it could be!

Avatar
#17 Wes
December 22 2013, 02:25PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

On Zack Kassian playing with the Sedins, I like it. He seems to have the vision and pedigree to get some points. The current argument being his defensive ability. Wouldn't playing with the Sedins help? putting him with the best possession players on the team a la tomas hertl along side Joe Thornton, to enable Logan couture and pavelski to take on lesser opponents. seems alright at a glance.

Avatar
#18 argoleas
December 22 2013, 02:30PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
Wes wrote:

On Zack Kassian playing with the Sedins, I like it. He seems to have the vision and pedigree to get some points. The current argument being his defensive ability. Wouldn't playing with the Sedins help? putting him with the best possession players on the team a la tomas hertl along side Joe Thornton, to enable Logan couture and pavelski to take on lesser opponents. seems alright at a glance.

I think it is very simple. If Kassian wants to play on that line, he has to learn to have a more complete game. This will happen. Everyone should recall how Kesler developed. He spent some time on the 4th line as well. Kassian is just 22. I think the development track that Torts has him on seems to be just the right balance of opportunity and firmness. To play with the Sedins he needs to earn the coach's trust, and he is not there yet.

Avatar
#19 argoleas
December 22 2013, 02:34PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
Ruprecht wrote:

That's pretty much how it works when you develop goaltenders. Would you rather be like Toronto?

I like what they have, and the comment was only partly in jest. The only thing wrong with the Schneider trade was that it took so long. It is clear that with Luongo's contract, they are tethered to him for many years. So no question that in 2.5 years when his contract is up, and if his play continues to develop and Eriksson is ready, he will be traded. That is just business.

Avatar
#20 Ruprecht
December 24 2013, 11:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
argoleas wrote:

I like what they have, and the comment was only partly in jest. The only thing wrong with the Schneider trade was that it took so long. It is clear that with Luongo's contract, they are tethered to him for many years. So no question that in 2.5 years when his contract is up, and if his play continues to develop and Eriksson is ready, he will be traded. That is just business.

Same here. All jest. I don't think we're as tethered to Lu as most people think. There will always be teams struggling to the cap floor that want the hit without paying the salary. More so next year with the cap rise.

Comments are closed for this article.