Skip the ‘A’ and just give Horvat the ‘C’ this summer

USATSI_9859952

Photo Credit: Anne-Marie Sorvin – USA TODAY Sports

Last summer, in a Province column, I lobbied for the Vancouver Canucks to bring Bo Horvat into their leadership group and make him an alternate captain. I have since revised my thinking on the matter. Now, I want them to skip the A altogether and just give him the captain’s C this off-season.

I say this with all the respect in the world to Henrik Sedin – the man who currently holds the captaincy and has done so through the best stretch of hockey in the organization’s history. Sedin’s track record speaks for itself on the ice, in the locker room and the community. Short of bringing a Stanley Cup to Vancouver, Sedin has delivered in every way possible and gone above and beyond to represent the organization.

But the Canucks need a change. And more importantly, the Canucks, as a franchise, need to be open to change. What they’re doing and the direction they’re headed isn’t working. It’s so clear on a nightly basis that Horvat is now the leader of the hockey club and the disappointing 2-4 road trip was further indication of how much Horvat means to this franchise. He scored in the last three games he dressed for, and in the one he missed in Pittsburgh on Tuesday, the Canucks put up a doughnut.

The torch has been passed on the stats sheet and in overall performance. So, make it official, make this Horvat’s team when this season ends on April 9th.

Sure, he’s young. But this isn’t about age. It’s about leadership and even at 21 – he’ll be 22 in April — Horvat already possesses the characteristics and qualities needed to lead the Canucks. He’s had three full seasons to get a read on this market, earned the respect of his teammates and demonstrated a comfort level and maturity to stickhandle through the media demands on a daily basis.

For weeks now, veteran teammates have been singing Horvat’s praises like Alex Burrows did to Jason Botchford in the December 31st edition of The Provies.

“He wants to drive this bus. He wants to be the leader of this team,” Burrows said. “He wants to be the go-to guy. He has that mindset. A lot of young players, at that age, they just sit back and watch and try to be a part of it. They don’t want to lead. He has that. He wants to lead the way. He wants to take over from Danny and Hank.”

As recently as Thursday, Canucks General Manager Jim Benning threw his support behind Horvat as a future captain of the hockey club. In his weekly appearance on TSN 1040 Radio, Benning responded to the idea of stitching the C on Horvat’s jersey sometime down the road made sense.

“It does to me,” Benning said. “He’s a candidate. Of our young players, he’s got that natural-born leadership in him. He’s a guy that plays the right way every night. He shows up and competes and works hard. I think he’d be a good role model for all of our good young players coming in. Henrik’s an excellent captain and Bo’s learning a lot from Henrik. And we’ll see when that time comes. But he’s for sure a candidate.”

Ideally, Henrik would make the process easy by taking it upon himself to transfer the letter this off-season. But these situations are never easy. However, Henrik doesn’t need another season of nightly explanations of why this team can’t score goals and can’t win hockey games. He doesn’t need the aggravation of trying to explain the mounting losses. He doesn’t need to justify why he and Daniel aren’t the same players they once were. This organizational decline has happened on their watch, but let’s be perfectly clear, it isn’t their fault.

Ideally, the Sedins could play out the final year of their current contracts free of the burdens attached with wearing a letter in the National Hockey League. Just let them perform to the best of their abilities as veterans on the hockey club, but no longer the two in charge of the locker room. They’ve done all they can in that role, but it’s time for new voices to usher in a new era. They’d still be there to support Horvat and lend guidance if necessary. But they wouldn’t be the dominant voices in the room.

One needn’t look further for a comparison than down the coast in the Bay Area where the transition of power from Patrick Marleau (2005-09) to Joe Thornton (2010-14) to Joe Pavelski (2015-present) hasn’t adversely affected the San Jose Sharks. In fact, Marleau and Thornton continue to perform at a remarkably high level, but they’re no longer seen as the faces of that franchise.

Henrik has had a seven-year run as the captain of the Vancouver Canucks. Again, fans should salute him for the way he’s conducted himself in the role. But as this season winds to a close with the Canucks likely to miss the playoffs for a second straight season and for the third time in four years, the time has come for the franchise’s all-time assists leader to do what he’s done throughout his career – and that’s know when to pass at just the right time. It seems like this off-season would be the perfect opportunity for Henrik Sedin to slide his C over to Bo Horvat.

It’s going to happen eventually. It may as well happen before next season.

  • Donald's Hat Trick

    So Bo gets selected to the All Star game because by default one guy per team has to go, and suddenly he is qualified to talk to the media after every game and explain why the team is playing so poorly?

  • Steampuck

    I’m onboard, but could we sign him to a long and team-friendly contract first? Before “leadership” earns him a few extra dollars against the cap?

  • natevk

    This is ridiculous, Jeff. Henrik is, will be and should be the Captain until he either signs somewhere else or retires. Using the gongshow of a situation of the Sharks leadership rotation as a precedent is not very convincing in my opinion. If Henrik had the sort of tiff with the team bosses that Thornton had, sure — but that is not even close to the reality here.

    You can’t say “I say this with all the respect in the world to Henrik Sedin” and then propose the Canucks strip that same man of the C to spark a “change” for PR purposes. Additionally, if the C is apparently such a burden for Hank that he should be relieved of it so he can play without stress next season, why should Bo take that now, when he is just beginning to show his potential.

    There’s no need to unnecessarily rock the boat in the locker room, that’s one of the few strengths of this team. Bo will be the captain one day, just let that day be once the Sedins are gone.

  • Dirty30

    Better to strip WD of the ‘C’ and find a Coach who can deploy the limited assets he has available to the best of their abilities.

    This tired show wouldn’t be any better if the team was filled with All-Stars.

    Who wears the C is a straw man on a team where the problem is less with the players and more with managerial and coaching incompetence.

    • Steamer

      Agree – hardly relevant to issues facing this team. Hank or Bo as C is not translating into either wins or losses. Kinda scraping the bottom as subject for an article – why not write about something actually meaningful to wins & losses, such as coaching decisions?

  • Burnabybob

    Tearing the C off of Henrik’s jersey before what is probably his final year in the NHL would be disrespectful and unnecessary. It wouldn’t make the Canucks a better team.

    What’s the rush? I think this can wait until next summer.

  • wojohowitz

    What an odd suggestion by JPat. It almost seems he has never understood the dynamics of the locker room, or could it be he is just stirring the pot.

    What makes more sense than demoting the captain is to make a clean break by trading him and in this case that won`t happen. Let Horvat wear the A and learn from Henrik with the expectation of being captain a year later.

  • UKCanuck

    This is utterly ridiculous, you must have been really struggling for content this week. Thoroughly disrespectful to Henrik who will and should remain captain until he retires. Bo will be captain but what is the rush, making him wait a year or two is just not a big deal.

  • Vladimir

    Ridiculous idea. Horvat becoming one of the most overhyped and overrated players in the league. When Bo gets Barkov money in his new deal it wouldn’t be funny anymore.

  • Riley Miner

    I think he’s worthy of the C, but stripping a player to do so seems counterintuitive. I don’t think Horvat would like taking the C at Henrik’s expense, even if Henrik’s on board (he’s a graceful man, I’m sure he would be). He’ll get the C the day Henrik retires, that’s how it should be.

  • Rodeobill

    I think it is an article with substance and an idea that should really be considered. At the crux of it all is this team needs to shift away from it’s former glory ideallogically, which is painfully obvious these last few years. My reservations would be is the added media stress and such (the “weight” of the team) negatively affect horvat’s game and learning curve? In some ways he becomes responsible for everybody’s effort rather than just going out there and doing his best every night. Is he ready for that? Secondly, it would pain me to do that to the Sedin’s if they felt it was a slap in the face rather than a burden being lifted (but I guess it is a business and that is part of the “not letting go” part of it all).

    Regardless, good article and well presented, and at the very least worth some consideration, but this choice seems heavy on details and situations known only in the locker room too.