Why the Vancouver Canucks Should Re-Sign Radim Vrbata

As the Vancouver Canucks try to escape the clutches of a teardown rebuild, they’re faced head on by the law of diminishing returns. They needn’t look any further on their roster than Radim Vrbata for a prime example of the effects.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Although the Canucks reaped enormous rewards on the front-nine of Vrbata’s two-year pact, it’s been all downhill since. In stark contrast to the immense value Vrbata and his 31-goals presented a season prior, the Canucks couldn’t pluck anything better than a late round selection by the trade deadline.

Vrbata’s status as a pending UFA has the Canucks four months away from losing him to free agency with nothing to show for it. There are other options though, as unpalatable as they may seem at first glance.

It’s hard not to look at Vrbata’s low impact on the scoresheet, night after night, and posit that there’s been a marked decline in ability. Vrbata’s 24-points, 12 goals and assists alike, don’t exactly jump off the page in a positive light. All the more so when one considers the $5-million cost to those 24-points, 58-games into the season.

This kind of scoring can erode confidence over time and it’s safe to say Vrbata’s is visibly shaken. Whether it’s timing or an inability to drown out the noise that washes ashore at Rogers Arena, something seems amiss. It’s entirely possible Vrbata is staring down free agency and the home stretch of his career has cashed his chips on this season, too.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

These factors can, and often have played a role in long-term declines in production. Every bit as likely and perhaps more relevant given our ability to account for it is the impact of variability and usage on Vrbata’s ability to make good on his chances.

Screen Shot 2016-03-08 at 9.00.41 PM

Vrbata’s impact on the team’s ability to generate shots remains solvent. His conversion rate clearly hasn’t deterred him from launching pucks at the opposition’s net. Vrbata is second on the Canucks in iCorsi/60 (16.82) and iFenwick (13.24). Given the Canucks status as a bottom-third club by every underlying shot-based metric, that’s value added to a roster in desperate need of it.

If Vrbata is still generating a high volume of shots, one might expect that at some point the offence will follow. The scoring chance data mirrors the underlying shot data (second on the team, again), so it’s not like these are strictly perimeter plays either.

The converse is that Vrbata forgot how to play offence overnight. Well, over the course of an off-season, anyways. It’s more likely that Vrbata’s 18th worst PDO (96.2) is driving his boxcars, and subsequently his trade value, into the dirt. Not to mention the fact that he’s spent much of this season away from the Sedin twins.

A few steps down the line is the impact this is having on the dollar value of Vrbata’s next contract. 

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

General managers – rightly or wrongly – use prior production to draw a number for contracts going into the future. Even in so analytics savvy a league as the NHL is becoming, this is a regular trend. Vrbata likely has one more stab at pay dirt and would be best served on a short-term deal that helps him get there. Sure as hell isn’t happening after this season.

The Canucks would be wise to use this leverage on a short term contract, at a higher dollar value than Vrbata is likely to receive on the open market. At the very worst, they’re stuck with another season of a very useful middle-six forward. Best case scenario, Vancouver recoups some of the assets they failed to extract the first go around.

When life gives you lemons, and so on.



  • Whackanuck

    Vrbata admits to frustrations this season. (Incidentally, fans also admit to frustrations with him, but that is aside from the point I’d like to make.)

    I think that after the frustrations this year Vrbata would not be interested in re-signing with the Canucks, at least without a truly massive overpayment on his contract.

    A truly massive overpayment would mean pretty much by definition that the Canucks couldn’t sign him to a contract that is worthwhile from the team’s perspective.

    Conclusion: There’s no point in speculating about whether the Canucks should, from their point of view, re-sign him. It isn’t going to happen.

    If his production improves next season, which is certainly possible, it will be for a team other than the Canucks.

  • Whackanuck

    Wasn’t he the #17 on the video clip coasting into his own zone against the Kings and setting a nice pick on Sbisa hustling back?

    iCorsi/60 (16.82) minus iFenwick (13.24) = a lot of blocked shots.

    Fenwick/60(13.24) minus Shots/60 (11.51) equals a lot of missed shots.

    Shooting percentage (6.49) equals a decent offensive defenseman. Only Prust, Higgins, Dorsett and Etem are worse and two of them are now in the minors.

  • Not Dressed For Tonight's Game

    Vrbata is the poster boy for why shot differential alone cannot be a proxy for strong play anymore than boxcar stats can. Why was Vrbata so valuable to us last year? Because he could put the puck in the net, drive the PP with someone willing to take a shot, play ok defense, and be a trigger man for the Sedins. Absent potting goals, not really shooting on the PP as much (which isn’t entirely on him), coast on D, and not play on the Sedin line, I fail to see how he is a VERY USEFUL middle six forward. Especially if we’re paying him first line money. I have a hard time seeing how he’s going to get anything less than $4 million and if Benning signs him to that before you right this piece CA would be SCREAMING about it (and I would too).

    Resigning Vrbata is exactly the kind of move that would make me jump aboard the no-faith-in-Benning train, not the minor swaps of prospects. It was bad enough that we didn’t trade him at the deadline and drove his value down all year (and I will give him props for being saddled with babysitting Baertschi and Horvat in the early part of the season). But to resign him would be to compound that error.

    We need these contracts to come off the books at this stage. If Hamhuis and Vrbata stay, they need to be at very team friendly levels (no more than $3 million each for 2 years with a limited NMC). I imagine they can easily find buyers at a higher price than that in other places.