Gillis would “absolutely” burn the first year of Corrado’s ELC if he’s “going to help us win hockey games”


Photograph by Jonathan Hayward / CP.

Mike Gillis gave Matt Sekeres and Blake Price a pretty meaty interview on the Team 1040 on Wednesday afternoon. We’ll probably pivot off of a couple of things he said today, just because there was enough content to legitimately do so, but let’s start with some choice comments Mike Gillis had on the subject of Frank Corrado and entry-level contracts.

In particular Gillis was asked if the team would be willing to burn the first year of Corrado’s entry-level contract, which because Frank Corrado didn’t turn twenty until this past spring is on schedule to "slide" so long the rookie defenceman plays in fewer than six NHL games, including playoffs, this season. His answer was definitive, so read on past the jump.

Here’s the relevant Mike Gillis quote (transcription my own, and emphasis my own too):

"Absolutely [we’d burn the first year of Corrado’s entry-level contract] we’re here to win hockey games. The consequence of burning a year for Frank isn’t going to be that much of a consequence. We’re projecting him say a guy whose going to compete for a spot on this team next year anyway. You know if he’s going to help us win hockey games he’s going to be in the lineup."

First of all, Mike Gillis is absolutely right here. If Corrado is one of your top-six available defenceman heading into any given playoff game this spring, you play him. Remember, if Corrado can help you win playoff games that’s not really "burning" a year of his entry-level deal.

The term "burning" implies that you’re not recouping proper value from it, like lighting a cigar with an old style Robert Borden. But if the player – in this case Corrado – is able to help you out in the postseason, then that’s quite probably more valuable to the Canucks than it would be to have a probable fifth or sixth defenceman on the books, for less than 600k against the cap, in a season three years down the road when the Sedin twins will be thirty-five. So yeah, it’s not like when the Oilers dithered around with Ryan Nugent-Hopkins…

Now it’s not a slam dunk that Corrado will be one of the team’s top-six defenceman at any point in time, but considering his competition includes guys like Derek Joslin and Cam Barker, it’s not really a long-shot either.

But I digress, beyond Mike Gillis’ comments on "burning" the first year of Corrado’s ELC, I found his comment: "the consequence of burning a year for Frank isn’t going to be much of a consequence" particularly telling. With the likes of Kevin Bieksa, Jason Garrison, Dan Hamhuis and Alex Edler locked up for the next three seasons, and Chris Tanev sure to follow this summer, it seems pretty unlikely that Frank Corrado is going to be counted on to play major minutes regularly during his entry-level contract. Certainly he won’t be when everyone is healthy.

As such, even if Corrado’s entry-level contract expires when he’s twenty-two (as opposed to when he’s twenty-three) we’re probably not talking about a lot of money to sign him to his second deal anyway (presuming he’s even a regular NHLer at that point). Hell if the Habs can sign PK Subban to a two year deal worth less than three million per season for his second contract, imagine what a third pairing utility guy with nowhere near Subban’s offensive upside will go for a couple of years down the line. Maybe 1.2M? 

Mike Gillis has taken some heat in the Vancouver market of late, and he’s made some moves that I think have been, or willdown the line prove to be costly (the Luongo contract, and the plethora of no-trade clauses in particular). But it’s very rare that Mike Gillis talks about managing an asset, and isn’t totally dead on. If you’re paying attention to teams and General Managers around the league, that sadly isn’t as common as one might expect…

In addition to those illuminating comments on burning Corrado’s entry level contract, Mike Gillis had this to add about Corrado’s season, development and skill set:

"Frank is a really good player, in our opinion he definitely should’ve been on the Canadian World junior team, I still don’t understand why he wasn’t when he was clearly in everyone’s estimation either the best defenceman, or one of the top two defenceman at the camp. He’s had a really strong season and does a lot of things well. He skates well, he’s got good size, and he’s got good vision. It’s only been one game but I’m not surprised he stepped in and played well."

On what sort of role we can expect to see Corrado play on the club going forward, Mike Gillis added these comments as well:

"He’ll play the next couple of games and he’s definitely going to be available to play games. Whether or not he plays regularly or not depends a lot on Chris Tanev and how long it takes him to come back, and other injuries we may face. But it’s a pretty comforting feeling knowing you have a pretty good young player who can step into the lineup, and play, and not hurt you."

 

  • BrudnySeaby

    Gillis is definitely correct that it would be well worth it to burn a year of an ELC if a player is helping the team win games in the playoffs.

    If you want an example of a team playing games with service time to their detriment, look at the LA Angels last year with Mike Trout.

    Sure, the fact that he was the best player in baseball after his callup was unpredictable.

    But the value that can be provided both in terms of winning and revenue to the owner by improving the chances of winning playoff games is well worth burning a year of an ELC.

  • BrudnySeaby

    “If you want an example of a team playing games with service time to their detriment, look at the LA Angels last year with Mike Trout.”

    Why are we looking to Baseball when we got the Oilers just sitting there?

  • chinook

    Here is a better perspective: Considering that SC playoffs are most important part of the season, better to have Corrado play now than wasting a year of his ELC on the regular season.

    • BrudnySeaby

      It doesn’t have to be one or the other, though.

      If the Canucks were a non-playoff team, there’s an argument that it would be a poor use of Corrado’s ELC to get him into 6 or more regular season games.

      But as Thomas says, considering how good the team is and the age of the Sedins, of course it makes sense to use him if he’s one of the best 6 healthy options.

  • chinook

    I’m trying hard to keep my expectations low about Corrado, but I love this kid. Very excited about what he can (potentially) bring to the team going forward.

  • chinook

    I think Tom has it bang-on with the fact that his second contract is unlikely to be too expensive anyway, so there’s not a whole lot really being burned. It’s a similar situation to Chris Tanev. He’s proven himself perfectly NHL-capable, but that doesn’t mean he’s about to get a $5 million raise as an RFA.