Torres Gets Tossed for 4… AND DESERVED IT!

Sit down, Raffi! We’ll see you in Game 3.
Photo: Andy Devlin, NHLI via Getty Images

The NHL handed Raffi Torres a four game suspension for this hit Tuesday on Jordan Eberle. While many Canucks’ fans are in an uproar about the length of the suspension, I am not one of them.

The league finally got this suspension right. So Canucks fans, stop blaming the NHL for its ruling. Blame Raffi Torres for his stupid, reckless, unnecessary play and costing his team for the next four games, including the first two games of this year’s playoffs.

The NHL suspended Raffi Torres four games for his blind-side elbow to the head of Jordan Eberle. It was a perfect example of a violation of NHL’s Rule 48, prohibiting blind-side hits to the head. Let me be clear about my stance on this ruling.

Raffi Torres deserved the suspension he received. This hit was reckless, dangerous, avoidable and a direct violation of the rule stated above. Therefore, he deserved what he got.

Canucks fans are up in arms because of the inconsistency in the NHL’s ruling on similar plays. Ok, I can somewhat understand that. But you can’t be mad that they finally got a ruling correct. The fact that Dany Heatley received a 2-game suspension for his hit on Steve Ott while Torres received four games is bizarre and questionable and highly inconsistent. But it should not be considered here, if we are to look at Torres’ hit in an isolated manner. If we are to look at each infraction objectively, then we must look at it first as an isolated incident, without influence from other similar plays. Now, I know that you HAVE to look at other rulings in order to provide a measuring stick. And I know for sure that you have to use a player’s previous indiscretions as a means of determining if he is a repeat offender. But to determine if the incident was suspendable or not, you have to look at it in a bubble.

This elbow WAS suspendable. So let’s move on.

Now the play itself likely warranted 2-3 games as a suspension. However, the fact is that the next two games mean nothing to Torres or the Canucks. There is literally NOTHING on the line for the Canucks. So the NHL had to make the team suffer a bit for the transgretion. So he would likely have gotten 3 games, to punish the Canucks and Torres at least one playoff game when it actually matters.

Furthermore, Torres has shown absolutely no contrition for this play. Quite the opposite, actually. He is adamant that it was a legal hit, that it was a "hockey play", and that he needs to make that play if he wants to keep his job. Wrong, wrong and wrong. It was not a legal hit, it was not a hockey play, and if he wants to keep his job in the NHL, score goals and hit people legally. So Torres’ insistence that this play was legal and that he refused to apologize for it, nor acknowledge the potential illegality of it likely added another game to his suspension. I have no problem with that. If he had simply apologized, and admitted it was an illegal hit, and talked to Eberle for beaning him in the skull with his elbow, Torres is likely only missing 1 playoff game.. maybe none. Maybe he only sits for the final two regular season games.

But the fact is that he has to be held responsible for his hit and so does his hockey club. And now they are. Don’t focus on the fact that the NHL has made a habit of screwing up their inability to suspend players for obvious infractions. You only have to understand that they finally got this one right.

So Raffi, you got what you deserved. Now, sit down for four games. We’ll see you in Game 3 of the first round. You had better come out on a mission to make amends. And you had better hope that your reckless play doesn’t cause your team to go down 0-2 in the first round before you even get to play a game.

  • OilFan

    Is anyone concerned in canuckland that two thirds of your vaunted third line will be on the shelf for the first two games of the playoffs? what about the injured defencemen taking a few games to get their playoff legs, if they are back at all? whoever you face, the first round will be tough.

    • I don’t think many folks are really concerned. I think some are a bit nervous. But it seems like Mason Raymond may be a decent fit at 3C.
      I am still a bit surprised that Maxim Lapierre hasn’t stepped up to grab that role. Although (and this may be me just being too optimistic) I sort of expect him to amp his game up in the playoffs. Hopefully that means that he’ll step up to take the third line C role.

      • OilFan

        No prob Cam. Gee I wish there was more people on this site. i love the nation websites. I hope it kicks off for you guys. Not a fan of cheering for a team since they are from Canada. But good luck in the playoffs to Vancouver and its fans

        • cheers. we’ll take all the good luck wishes we can get. There is a bizarre mix of optimism and sheer anxiety in the city right now. We look at the Canucks record and think “Ok. Finally. This COULD be the year!” but then we realize its the Canucks who are eternally doomed to never reach the ultimate destination EVER, just providing another year of disappointments and woulda/coulda/shoulda’s.

          Good times!

          • OilFan

            Disappointments lol, are you sure you don’t cheer for the Oilers ? Keep up the good work Cam. I’m guessing this site will get busy once the playoffs begin

  • @John

    Yep – fair comments. And I agree with you. Their incompetence has been shown all season. You can count on one hand the number of suspensions they’ve got right this year. But there have been A LOT of missteps.

  • OilFan

    I am not blaming the league for wanting to eliminate this kind of hit in fact I am in favour of this policy. I am blaming them, however, for rampant inconsistency and hypocrisy in selecting the incidents to which they apply supplemental discipline and those they choose to turn a blind eye to. A roulette wheel would produce more consistent results than Colin Campbell and the NHL.

  • @Earl

    Unfortunately, the NHL has proved that they are brutally incompetent when it comes to consistency in handing out punishment and suspensions.
    But that doesn’t mean that they got this particular case wrong. It’s not that they are applying a different standard. It’s that they have no idea how to apply their standard in the first place.

    You’re right that the Canucks played their asses off. However… yes they do need to be punished. As Mario Lemieux said, organizations have to be held responsible for their players. The Canucks have to been held accountable for Torres’ actions, as much as Torres does. Suspending Torres for only two games does not punish the team at all. Otherwise it’s simply a forced mini-vacation for Raffi and the Canucks are no worse for wear. Then there isn’t really a punishment, is there?

  • OilFan

    I disagree on two points:
    1) I’m all for a new “measuring stick” where Torres hit = 4 game suspension. I’m not ok with a different standard being applied all year, then a sudden change after an incident happens. Standards have to be in place in advance – as a more severe example, if Canada were to adopt capital punishment, people who were already on trial for murder wouldn’t be subject to the death penalty.

    2) It’s irrelevant that the last two regular season games are meaningless to the Canucks. The Canucks played their asses off all year and were the best team, and as a result they have a few meaningless games. Why should they be punished for this?