Raise The Roof: Canucks & Lightning
Yankee Canuck
December 11 2010 07:43PM
Tampa Bay Lightning @ Vancouver Canucks
7:30 PM PST
| Bolts | Canucks | |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Wins | 15 |
| 10 | Losses | 8 |
| 4 | OTL | 3 |
| 3.07 (T-8th) | Goals/Game | 3.23 (4th) |
| 3.45 (30th) | Goals Against/Game | 2.54 (7th) |
| 23.1% (4th) | PP | 25% (1st) |
| 84.4% (9th) | PK | 87% (4th) |
I'm Pretty Sure It Was Naslund
Cam Davie
December 11 2010 03:39PM
By special guest contributor Thomas Drance
When it was announced that Markus Naslund's jersey would be retired - the news was met with a hearty mix of skepticism, mockery (mostly from Leafs fans), and for some: jubilation. Count me in the third category.
Not My Choice... But Congrats #19
Cam Davie
December 10 2010 12:56PM
Two former Canucks captains will share a new bond starting Saturday, with #19 joining #16 in the rafters, along with #12.
I have already made my argument. I didn't think (and still don't) that Markus Naslund should have his jersey retired. I wrote about it a year and a half ago. READ IT HERE.
But there is obviously no changing it now. On Saturday, Naslund's #19 will be raised to the rafters of Rogers Arena. And even I, one who disagrees with the choice altogether, will be cheering for him. Even if you disagree with the choice, you should be cheering too.
So do it.
Stick & Move, Stick & Move: Canucks & Ducks
Yankee Canuck
December 08 2010 08:18PM
Anaheim Mighty Ducks @ Vancouver Canucks
6:00 PM PST
| Quacks | Canucks | |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Wins | 14 |
| 13 | Losses | 8 |
| 3 | OTL | 3 |
| 2.43 (23rd) | Goals/Game | 3.20 (5th) |
| 2.93 (23rd) | Goals Against/Game | 2.48 (6th) |
| 19.6% (10th) | PP | 24.7% (2nd) |
| 81.7% (T-18th) | PK | 88.5% (3rd) |
GDR #26 - Ducks @ Canucks
Cam Davie
December 08 2010 11:19AM

Game Day Recon #26 - Ducks @ Canucks
The last time the Ducks and Canucks met, the Ducks still hadn't won a game... until they beat the Canucks. Getzlaf, Ryan and Perry were awful to start the year... until they beat the Canucks.
Sounds like a great recipe for revenge, don't you think?


