Prospect Profile: #8 Ben Hutton

That's Offside!
August 28 2014 11:43AM

12

As we move closer and closer to the top-5 prospects in the Vancouver Canucks' system, we start moving out of "we hope this guy can make the NHL" territory, and into the range of guys where we can reasonably expect them to make some sort of legitimate NHL impact. 

Ben Hutton, our 8th ranked prospect, hasn't quite earned "surefire NHLer" status yet, but considering the season he had with the University of Maine Black Bears in the NCAA last year, he's knocking loudly on that door.

While a large majority of the guys we've profiled can say that they had a good 2013-2014 (except for one extremely notable guy we'll get to some time down the road), only Hutton can claim that his was all-time good. The big, mobile, and talented forward-turned-defender broke a University of Maine scoring record for defensemen, rippling the mesh behind notoriously stingy Hockey East goalies an astounding 15 times. But in case "Look! GOALS!" wasn't a strong enough selling point, Ben Hutton does all sorts of other things quite well, too, leaving us with many, many reasons to be hopeful that he'll find himself in the NHL sooner rather than later.

Generally speaking, the biggest concern you should have when looking at a guy with an oddly high goal total is that he simply rode a high shooting percentage for the majority of the season. Ben Hutton did shoot at a 12.61% clip last year, which is really high for a defenseman and likely due to regress in the long run, but it's also worth pointing out a couple of things: 

1) The comparatively larger talent gap that exists between top and bottom end players in leagues lower than the NHL means that things like shooting talent should be more pronounced than it is in the NHL, and therefore high shooting percentages somewhat more sustainable

2) Just look at these highlights:


Yeah, there are some floaters from the blueline that probably won't keep finding the back of the net in the long run, but there are also quite a few goals from places where you really wouldn't expect a defenseman to be. For example, just look at where he is on the first goal of that highlight package:

hutton

Not only has Hutton thrown the penalty kill for a loop by roaming from the far left point to the near right corner, but he also scores from a near impossible angle, beating the goalie from an position that he really doesn't have much business hitting the net from. Having the presence of mind to attack the opposing net like a forward and get yourself into prime scoring locations is one way to theoretically maintain a high shooting percentage, and it looks like Hutton is able to do just that.

Regardless, 15 goals is a hard thing to do if you're a 20-year old D in the NCAA. Justin Schultz, a noted offensive dynamo in college, had 18 in his 20-year old season, while Torey Krug and Brendan Smith had 12 and 15 in their respective campaigns. Former Colorado Avalanche 2nd rounder Colby Cohen also tallied 14 times for Boston University when he was 20, and Preds 4th rounder Garrett Noonan scored 16 times in 2011-2012. Other than that, 15 G, 20-year old D are very few and far between.

Aside from being the only defenseman in the NCAA's Hockey East to lead his team in goals, Hutton also added 14 assists on the year, giving him the Hockey East lead in total scoring by defensemen, and only 23-year old Trevor van Riemsdyk had a higher points per game. 

Perhaps the most statistically impressive thing about Hutton's season aren't his lofty point totals, but his obscenely high shot rate. Josh Weissbock found that Hutton averaged 3.4 shots on goal per game this past season, which is a ton for any player, let alone a blueliner. To put 3.4 shots per game into perspective, only 16 skaters, none of whom are defenseman, averaged more shots on goal per game in the NHL last year. They include Alex Ovechkin, Jamie Benn, Evander Kane, Phil Kessel, Tyler Seguin, Max Pacioretty, Corey Perry, and Jeff Skinner. Hutton is obviously an elite offensive D in the NCAA, but what about his own end of the ice?

Hutton's NCAA coach, Red Gendron, certainly thinks that Hutton is as reliable in his end of the ice as he is effective in his opponent's:

He's got a great stick, and he's got a great feel for the game. Obviously, he can skate. But there have been moments this year, on the penalty kill and other defensive situations, he's been incredible. Basically, most nights he and Brice O'Connor play against the other team's best players.

SBNation's College Hockey blog, who ranked Hutton as the number 21 prospect in the entire NCAA, shares a similar sentiment:

Hutton is clearly the horse of the Maine blue line and has often times spent the entire two minutes on the ice during a penalty kill. He has good vision and has the ability ti be a one-man breakout.

Hutton was rewarded for his terrific season with the Black Bears by being named to Hockey East's first all-star team, along with teammate and Dallas 2nd round pick Devin Shore, Florida 1st round pick Michael Matheson, Chicago 1st round pick Kevin Hayes, and Calgary 4th rounder and 2014 Hobey Baker winner John Gaudreau. Needless to say, the now 20-year old defenseman has grown by leaps and bounds since being selected as a draft+1 player in the 5th round of 2012.

It's pretty rare that an NHL team can boast a 6'3", 200+ lb defenseman that's a force at both ends of the ice. These types of guys are generally extremely coveted and perhaps the single hardest asset to find in today's NHL. But that's exactly what Ben Hutton is right now, and even though it's far from a guarantee that he'll be anything near that at the NHL level, he's shown that he belongs in the discussion with Vancouver's other top prospects.

It's hard to say what a defenseman's ceiling is - Kevin Bieksa evolved into a legitimate top-pairing D after a modest CCHA career - so we don't really know with any degree of certainty what Ben Hutton will turn into. Maybe he'll be Justin Schultz. Maybe he'll be Jeff Schultz. Maybe he'll be really good. Maybe he'll suck. What we can say is that Hutton looks like he's given himself as good a chance as any to make the NHL in a legitimate full-time capacity, and really, that's all you can reasonably ask of a 5th round pick.

OTHER PROFILES IN THIS SERIES:

10df053f41f4bdaf4d65eca6e982e46d
Rhys Jessop - CanucksArmy's resident CHL buff/hater of prospects, depending on who you ask. Follow my ramblings on Twitter: @Thats_Offside. Email contact: thats.offside.hockey[at]gmail.com
Avatar
#1 NM00
August 28 2014, 12:01PM
Trash it!
34
trashes
Props
17
props

The most exciting part is that he's only 21 and already 6 foot 3.

Forget Kevin Bieksa.

If this guy has another growth spurt or three in him a la Jordan Subban, Ben Hutton could be the next Zdeno Chara...

Avatar
#2 5minutesinthebox
August 28 2014, 01:13PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Props
12
props
NM00 wrote:

The most exciting part is that he's only 21 and already 6 foot 3.

Forget Kevin Bieksa.

If this guy has another growth spurt or three in him a la Jordan Subban, Ben Hutton could be the next Zdeno Chara...

At 21 there is very little growth left in him, certainly not 6 inches of growth. Other than packing on a bit more muscle in order to deal with the bigger bodies of the NHL, anymore growth might hurt his mobility, which seems like its a huge part of his game.

And did I miss where Jordan Subban had a growth spurt? 'A la' or as in the same manner of, would refer that this has already happened, and there is no indication that a drastic growth spurt will occur with Subban.

Avatar
#3 JDM
August 28 2014, 02:03PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
8
props

The Subban thing was a good hint that he was being facetious. I gather the point was to poke fun at overly optimistic fans who were pinning their hopes for Subban on a growth spurt that they think he might still have coming.

Avatar
#4 Goon
August 28 2014, 02:07PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
17
props

@5minutesinthebox

He was being snarky and not contributing anything. It's NM00.

Avatar
#5 5minutesinthebox
August 28 2014, 02:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

I should have caught that right away. He actually seemed high on a Canucks prospect. That should have been the first indication. Hutton seems like the genuine article though, and at only 21, he has a ton of room to 'grow'. This is one of the Canucks prospects that I see beating expectations.

Avatar
#6 Spiel
August 28 2014, 02:44PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
6
props

5th rounder in 2012 who may project as "perhaps the single hardest asset to find in today's NHL".

Mark one up for the scouting staff? Who did Sham Sharron suggest we take with that pick in 2012?

Avatar
#7 antro
August 28 2014, 02:51PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
8
props

So, Hutton scored three times from that same spot on the PP, near right corner, snapping it after a deke from number 94. He is obviously a guy they are building some of the set-plays around, which is good, I assume.

I actually think that NM00 was making fun of the fellow who said that Subban is going to grow another 2 inches. I don't think he's making fun of Rhys, because that would mean that NM00 didn't read carefully at the end, where Rhys says that we can't really predict how Hutton will shape up. NM00 always reads carefully.

I assume it's hard to predict Hutton because there aren't enough comparables.

Avatar
#8 SJ
August 28 2014, 04:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
8
props

I like those blue-on-blue Maine jerseys. Classy.

Avatar
#9 PB
August 28 2014, 06:35PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

It's hard to tell because I don't know how the overall quality of competition compares with some of the major junior leagues and players for other prospects but I saw him in 3 games last year and he was really impressive. Big and fast, though I don't really remember him hitting much. Never seemed to get caught out of position though maybe he was just fast enough to get back into the play. I don't know about the college PPs though, it looks like they don't spend any time practicing those. At least he seems like a legitimate prospect.

Avatar
#11 hu37on
August 28 2014, 07:30PM
Trash it!
22
trashes
Props
3
props

Drance should do the write up for every prospect.

Rhys the veiled shot u took at Virtanen near the start of the article was a coward move. Prime example of why CA is irrelevant. Brutal

Avatar
#13 antro
August 28 2014, 08:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
7
props

@hu37on:

Huh?! What veiled shot? Virtanen hasn't been profiled yet, which means that he's in "the range of guys where we can reasonably expect them to make some sort of legitimate NHL impact." I'm sure Virtanen is very offended by that damning description.

This is a great write-up, with lengthy discussion of the player. It has both as much statistical analysis as is possible, as well as relevant quotes from coaches and reporters who've watched Hutton. In that sense, it follows the format of every single other write-up.

If you don't like CA, go somewhere else.

Avatar
#14 Origamirock
August 28 2014, 10:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
10
props

I think he thought the part of this sentence in the parenthesis:

"While a large majority of the guys we've profiled can say that they had a good 2013-2014 (except for one extremely notable guy we'll get to some time down the road), only Hutton can claim that his was all-time good. "

was somehow supposed to be a "shot" at Virtanen and then proceeded to use his Jump To Conclusions Mat®. It's actually a hint at the fact that Shinkaruk was injured for most of the year.

Avatar
#15 Locky
August 29 2014, 03:13AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

2014 and people still make youtube highlight videos with random music overlaid. Why.

Avatar
#16 mfalk92
August 29 2014, 04:31AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
0
props

I don't know. At this point in their careers, I'd have a tough time taking Gaunce over Hutton. Gaunce has little to no upside and will likely be easily replaceable in the NHL as a 3 or 4C if he does make it. Hutton easily has top 4 upside and you could argue he has the potential to be a stud. Not saying Hutton is destined to have a better career, but I would have a very, very hard time justifying Gaunce>Hutton right now.

Avatar
#17 Mantastic
August 29 2014, 09:02AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
2
props

@hu37on

Drance is much more biased than Rhys. IMO Rhys is the much better writer than Drance hands down. Rhys is more critical and creative thinker while Drance loves to write puff pieces to drive clicks.

Avatar
#18 Hang on...
August 29 2014, 09:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

@hu37on

I thought Rhys was talking about Shinkaruk not being able to say he had a "good 2013/14". You know, given that he lost all but 18 to injury and missed out on the WJHC.

Or am I missing something?

As far as I can tell Virtanen did have a reasonably good year (71 points in 71 games, more than doubling his points from the year before).

Avatar
#19 islander
August 29 2014, 11:44AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props

I like the Virtanen pick. At least the Nucks are starting to pick players that can skate. Gaunce and Horvat can have all of the intangibles but if they continue to plod around the ice like they do then they won't make much of an impact in the future.

Avatar
#20 Spiel
August 29 2014, 01:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props
That's Offside! wrote:

From the final Sham Sharron article where it was bolded and italicized and everything:

"We did not design Sham Sharron to be a good or intelligent way to draft. Sham is a benchmark we have created to test each team's scouting department against publicly available information. We do not for a second believe that any NHL team should draft in the same manner as Sham."

Sham is supposed to be bad. That was kind of the whole point of that exercise.

I get that Sham is not supposed to be the best way to draft. My failed attempt at humor...

Hutton was an overager from tier 2 junior. Don't tell me that the boys here at Canucks Army would not have panned that pick. Mallet in the 2nd round basically cancels out the good from Hutton in the 5th though.

Avatar
#21 hu37on
August 29 2014, 10:03PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
Hang on... wrote:

I thought Rhys was talking about Shinkaruk not being able to say he had a "good 2013/14". You know, given that he lost all but 18 to injury and missed out on the WJHC.

Or am I missing something?

As far as I can tell Virtanen did have a reasonably good year (71 points in 71 games, more than doubling his points from the year before).

If this is true then I retract the previous statement.

but Rhys u better hope Virtanen gets a decent write up or im holding u personally responsible. U've been warned.

Avatar
#22 chrìs
August 29 2014, 11:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

i hope this guy turns into a smaller ish Brent burns.

Man that would be sweet

*gazes into the distance

Comments are closed for this article.