You get a trade, you get a trade, and you get a trade! So do Jason Garrison and the Lightning

Dimitri Filipovic
June 27 2014 01:34PM

Screen Shot 2013-11-13 at 10.58.48 AM
This sort of black magic may be of interest to some.

I had initially written up a post about the rumblings that were coming from Bob McKenzie earlier today regarding interest both the Montreal Canadiens and Tampa Bay Lightning had shown in Jason Garrison. The article was set to run just a few minutes before the news of the trading of Ryan Kesler came out, so we shelved it for the time being(*). 

(*) Roughly an hour or so, because that's exactly how long it took for the Canucks to announce their second trade of the day. A day that's still quite young, remember.

This is essentially a straight salary dump for the Canucks. Garrison had himself a woeful campaign last season, and more importantly, there are still prevailing health-related concerns with him moving forward. His name was one that I had brought up as a potential compliance buyout candidate a while back; mostly because there had been rampant speculation that he wouldn't be willing to waive his NMC to leave a place that he took a hometown discount to initially come to.

With all of the flaws, it's easy to see why the Lightning would be interested in his services. He has a cannon of a shot, and despite everything that went wrong for him and the Canucks he still wound up as a top-40 point getter amongst NHL defensemen last season. With Sami Salo becoming an unrestricted free agent in a few days, I imagine Garrison will slot in on the power play in his stead. Stevie Y is probably viewing this as a buy low opportunity on a guy that was in a terrible situation last year; maybe getting back to Florida and having less of an emphasis placed on him as a weapon on the man advantage will do him some good. 

For the Canucks, this move opens up a more secure spot in the lineup for Franklin Corrado and gives them a whole lot of cap space -- they're 12th in terms of in terms of cap space heading into July 1st. The problem, though, is that attempting to build a winning team through the unrestricted free agent market is generally a losing proposition. That's only augmented by the noticeably low level of high-end talent up for grabs. Spending money just for the sake of spending money because it's burning a whole in your pocket is a recipe for all sorts of trouble.

Anyways, the larger point is that the Canucks appear to have a desire to make some grander scale changes with a group of players that's gotten stale over the years, and could have the flexibility to accomplish that if they so chose. These past two moves likely signal the embrace for this change by the front office, which is both exciting and frightening; maybe moreso the latter, based on how things have gone for this franchise in recent years. 

We could potentially look back to today as a good start to a rebuild that inevitably needed to be done, if only to avoid becoming the next Calgary Flames. Everyone in the front office deserves a break from all of this hard work -- preferably to a remote location that doesn't have any sort of cell service and keeps them away from civilization through the first week of July.

7482b25b962fb1661ea9028fb4e0db36
Dimitri Filipovic writes about hockey on the internet, and is the Managing Editor of Canucks Army. You can follow him on Twitter @DimFilipovic, and email him at dimitri.filipovic@gmail.com.
Avatar
#1 NM00
June 27 2014, 01:46PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
14
props

On the bright side, I'm sure Aquillini prefers pick #50 over the millions of dollars required on a Garrison buyout...

Avatar
#2 NM00
June 27 2014, 01:47PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
12
props

@Ruprecht

At least this is a legitimate reset as opposed to trying the same thing over and over again with the same old core and expecting an improved result...

Avatar
#3 NM00
June 27 2014, 02:43PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
6
props

@Mantastic

A lot closer to the Flames than the 2012 Habs...

Avatar
#4 Ruprecht
June 27 2014, 02:14PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
5
props

@NM00

True enough, and we got rid of a couple of NTC's in the process. Some freedom gained and room for some more movement.

Avatar
#5 Ruprecht
June 27 2014, 01:45PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
3
props

Very happy. Today we got cap space for free agency, solid picks, more mobility and younger on the back end, and depth. As a bonus, that odd feeling of impending doom approaching the draft of is gone as well.

Avatar
#6 islander
June 27 2014, 02:12PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
3
props

Dorsett now as well. I'm liking this day so far.

Avatar
#7 Mantastic
June 27 2014, 02:30PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
3
props

i wouldn't be so quick claiming not to be the next flames, you still have the sedins and are more than likely not going to get any assets as they leave the team.

Avatar
#8 North Island #1
June 27 2014, 02:19PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
2
props

If only we could get rid of Edler.(Yes I know many of you love Edler), but,but!! since he hurt his back ,and.. he`s played timid since his suspension.He is a shell of what he was or could be. Then my day would be complete.Sorry Linden Edler will disappoint again this season, mark my words.

Avatar
#9 GeezMoney
June 27 2014, 04:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props
Neil B wrote:

You're quite right. As Edler pointed out, no one accepts a trade in their first year of an NCT. So, there are two possibilities: either the Sedins 'return to form' (and by that, I mean realistic 65-75 point seasons) and the Prairie Empire doesn't want to trade them, or they continue to be 50-point de facto second liners, in which case their trade value will be low (especially with the contracts they have).

So the question you ask is: is a low return on the Sedins worth more than having them remain with the team as mentors to the youth movement coming up?

Their value going forward is selling tickets. Vancouver is a big boys market. Regardless of the lack of rings, this market wants to be entertained or fans simply won't come out. Thus, the Sedins matter in that sense.

Plus, it really doesn't hurt having legacy players around: guys who play their entire career in one city.

Avatar
#10 Doop
June 27 2014, 02:20PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

Matt Niskanen.

Avatar
#11 Mantastic
June 27 2014, 04:53PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
1
props

@Neil B

ask leaf, flames fans regarding Sundin or Iginla. They would have either wished to move Iggy earlier or move Sundin period.

Avatar
#12 Ruprecht
June 27 2014, 02:18PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
0
props
islander wrote:

Dorsett now as well. I'm liking this day so far.

While I was posting no less. I may get a little bashed for this but I was thinking think a guy like Steve Downey might be a nice sandpapery compliment to Dorsett...just in case things need to get extra gritty. The guy can do minutes anywhere when reigned in properly and is still relatively young and cheap.

Avatar
#13 Neil B
June 27 2014, 04:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Mantastic wrote:

i wouldn't be so quick claiming not to be the next flames, you still have the sedins and are more than likely not going to get any assets as they leave the team.

You're quite right. As Edler pointed out, no one accepts a trade in their first year of an NCT. So, there are two possibilities: either the Sedins 'return to form' (and by that, I mean realistic 65-75 point seasons) and the Prairie Empire doesn't want to trade them, or they continue to be 50-point de facto second liners, in which case their trade value will be low (especially with the contracts they have).

So the question you ask is: is a low return on the Sedins worth more than having them remain with the team as mentors to the youth movement coming up?

Comments are closed for this article.