Was not dealing Ryan Kesler at the trade deadline really the worst thing, though?

J.D. Burke
March 06 2014 08:30PM

Screen Shot 2014-03-06 at 6.24.11 PM
Screengrab via Play Now Sports

All of the talk in Vancouver leaving yesterday's trade deadline had to do with the one that the Canucks didn't make, rather than the two they did. The way the rumours had been given an opportunity to gain steam and marinate in the week leading up to it surely played into that, as did Ryan Kesler's tweet (and awkward way of trying to deflect the attention afterwards, except not really).

How the team handled the entire situation has been a polarizing topic. Without being in the room, we may never know the full story of how close a trade actually was at any time leading up to the deadline, but the fact of the matter is that the Canucks are a fast-sinking ship, and a seemingly malcontent Kesler is still here. 

A case can certainly be made that it would've behooved the team to expedite his departure from the situation in an attempt to begin the "retooling" as Mike Gillis calls it, but - strap into your seats - I'm actually of the belief that the Canucks were wise to note cater to the contenders that circled them once they smelled blood.

Speaking frankly and based on what we know of the Pittsburgh Penguins offers on the table, would having sent Kesler their way been anything but catering to them? A package of Brandon Sutter, and two draft picks? An overrated third line center and two picks (that figure not to be in a prime slot because of where the Penguins sit in the standings) for what's arguably the Canucks' best player?

That’s hardly the king's ransom I would expect Vancouver to get in return for the player affectionately (and more recently, annoyingly) referred to as "Beast Mode". Even if he's only on-pace for his lowest point total over an 82-game season since 2008, I'd have to imagine that a second-line center of his caliber can fetch more than that… right? Then again, I don't wear a fancy suit.

But when your General Manager is tripping on himself, spinning this season as just an "anomaly" (conveniently, last season was a “weird” one) and symbolically throwing in the towel with the trade of Roberto Luongo, you can’t deal from a position of strength. Getting back to that tripping remark - the Canucks are by his admission “fighting for a playoff spot”. Not that I think anyone is buying that, these days.

With this we are just beginning to scratch the surface of the Kesler-Canucks dichotomy. The narratives, both inward and out, are as fluid and interchangeable as Kesler's linemates in Vancouver, and every bit as suspect. Just a day before the deadline, the Canucks were effectively "retooling", or something. They couldn’t trade Kesler, and now they’re fighting for the playoffs. Right.

The saddest part about all of this is that I can’t help but feel that the reality lies somewhere smack dab in the middle: no-man’s land, as it were. And in that you have just a glimpse into the mind of one Michael David Gillis. The writing is on the wall: miss the playoffs and your walking papers are ready.

With this in mind, I can’t help but acknowledge the sort of pretzel logic - thanks for that term, Steely Dan - Gillis has found himself trapped in. Realistically speaking, the Canucks don’t have a hope in high-hell of making the playoffs. BUT, that hope is marginally better with Ryan Kesler. That said, what good will be making the playoffs, just to be jettisoned in a similar fashion to last year? And so it goes on, and on, and on… and on.

With the team's embattled leader desperate to save his job, how could we not expect the vultures to swirl in? Surely the hope is that Gillis can be swayed into accepting less than market value (where, oh where, would they get the idea that he would EVER do such a thing?) so as to showcase a longterm plan and perhaps sway the Aquilinis into giving him another year. How can I assume anything else when the best reported offer centered on a career third-liner?

Then there’s the issue of that meddling ownership. To this point nobody has been able to put a thumb on just how much involvement ownership had in the deadline war room, but Gillis admitted that they were to some degree involved in the entirety of the process (and not just with the Kesler situation). Others have intimated as much, as well. 

There is, of course, the remarks from one Penguins writer, Rob Rossi, who suggests that ownership was the main impediment in getting any deal done with the Canucks. Rossi even went so far as to suggest that ownership “nixed” a trade between the two clubs. But then again, lets just remember who’s agenda he’s pushing here; something tells me he’s not exactly a Canucks fan.

By that same token, I can’t help but wonder if ownership really was the mitigating factor here. Remember, if you will, that this is the same ownership group that was reticent to buyout Keith Ballard (how’s his post-AV Norris bid going, anyways?) and his onerous contract last offseason. Oh, and yeah, that Luongo guy too. Whatever wound up happening to him?

Is ownership every bit as delusional as some would write them off as? Well, if they’re forcing Gillis to keep Kesler around for a playoff push (for that Cash Rules Everything Around Me, dollar dollar bill, y'all), the answer is probably yes. Very much yes.

It’s also likely that they just don’t trust Gillis and his crisis goatee at this point as well. It would be incredibly unfair and disingenuous of me to look at the Canucks goaltending situation without taking into account the surrounding circumstances… BUT! In less than a calendar year, Vancouver has gone from having it’s best goaltending tandem in franchise history to having two very unproven netminders in their stead. Oh, and the returns on that tandem include: one roster player, one blue chip prospect and one floundering prospect of a backup goaltender.

Basically, things in Canuckistan are incredibly unstable and volatile. As volatile as I can ever remember things being. Whether the Canucks couldn’t get what they wanted, ownership said no, or Gillis is just being stubborn doesn’t matter at this point.

What matters is that by waiting until the draft, more teams will be able to partake in the Ryan Kesler sweepstakes. And that, is good. Better yet, there might even be a new guy at the helm by then. Me, I’m putting an electric razor in his welcoming gift-basket. I’ve had enough of the crisis goatee.

096d629787fddfce3e8c03270ac0016e
J.D. Burke is a hockey and football writer/blogger, that can be found on several different sites, including this one. Enjoys long walks on the beach and sushi. Can be followed on Twitter @JDylanBurke
Avatar
#1 ralphy
March 07 2014, 07:38AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
1
props
Senrik Hedin wrote:

depends if torts is fired or not, and what kind of players they bring in with $15M cap space.

bottom line is, even if it was smarter asset management, theoretically, to trade kesler at the trade deadline, penguins offered Sutter, Depres and 1st, while Ducks offered Etem/Vatanen and 1st. Those offers won't go away during the summer because they are crap deals for kesler anyways.

kesler is not handcuffed by a contract that doesn't expire until his next life so no need to make a trade for sake of making a trade.

#firetorts #firegillis and then let's talk trade.

As a GM, the ultimate measurement of your performance is the number of Cups you've won.

Kesler was so valuable at this trade deadline to help a team win the Cup.

Unthinkable to me that offers for him will get better in the summer - his value from a buyer's perspective has just been diluted considerably.

Fackin Gillis and all the BS that's happening with this team

Avatar
#2 NM00
March 06 2014, 09:00PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
9
props

Ryan Kesler determines how many teams are involved in the Ryan Kesler sweepstakes.

Pissing away his asset value is not going to improve the offers from the few teams to which he will accept a trade.

Or maybe he'll just steer the bus towards a single, preferred destination.

And if that destination is Pittsburgh, the trade will be underwhelming from a Canucks perspective.

Of course, the Canucks can always hang onto Kesler until the 2016 deadline and trade him for pennies on the dollar similar to yesterday's Vanek trade...

Avatar
#3 whitesmoke
March 07 2014, 09:01AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
5
props

St.Louis, Callahan, Gaborik, Vanek, Moulson, Hemsky. The market was flooded with sellers. It was a bad day to trade Kesler. I actually give Gillis credit, by waiting until the draft, he might have more of a demand and Kesler may open up his wish list of teams.

Avatar
#4 The Benevolent Orca
March 07 2014, 03:45PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
1
props

I think what pissed me off the most was seeing Gillis on a golf course.... It just screams "we're done" and is BEYOND the realm of professionalism.

Avatar
#5 UkeeRob
March 07 2014, 11:08AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
1
props

If Pittsburgh really wanted Kesler so badly they should have offered up a package that included Beau Bennett, Derek Pouliot or Scott Harrington and a first round pick in 2015's deep draft. Kesler was once again one of the best players in the Olympics and the Canucks aren't going to give him away. Gillis needs to stop holding onto assets that want out. Players and their agents need to stop handcuffing the GM from making a solid deal by leaking their desires publicly. The best way to get out is to allow the GM to deal from a position of strength, but the GM can't expect that position of strength to last forever. Simple really

Avatar
#6 Senrik Hedin
March 06 2014, 09:42PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
5
props

depends if torts is fired or not, and what kind of players they bring in with $15M cap space.

bottom line is, even if it was smarter asset management, theoretically, to trade kesler at the trade deadline, penguins offered Sutter, Depres and 1st, while Ducks offered Etem/Vatanen and 1st. Those offers won't go away during the summer because they are crap deals for kesler anyways.

kesler is not handcuffed by a contract that doesn't expire until his next life so no need to make a trade for sake of making a trade.

#firetorts #firegillis and then let's talk trade.

Avatar
#7 andyg
March 07 2014, 07:59AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

@ralphy

I think they missed the best chance also.

Hopefully he does not get injured if the plan is to move him at the draft.

Keep in mind the owners may not be ready for a rebuild and they set the coarse that is to be followed.

Calgary went through the same thing with their ownership group.

Avatar
#8 andyg
March 07 2014, 08:20AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

Both Gillis and Torts have several years left on their contracts.

Do you really think ownership will be willing to carry that money and then pay the new staff?

Avatar
#9 Mantastic
March 07 2014, 10:15AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

@whitesmoke

the teams interested in Kesler (ana, pits, phi) didn't get any of those names you mentioned. not to mention that Callahan, Gaborik, Vanek, Moulson and Hemsky are all free agents in the summer and are free to acquire. if you think the market was flooded before, think about the summer where the contenders can acquire that talent without giving up anything at all.

Avatar
#10 Dan
March 07 2014, 01:05PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

I have to admit I was once a avid drinker of the Mike Gillis Kool-aid but have since weened myself off the intoxicating brew. With that in mind I'm not that dissatisfied with the deal line deals or lack of deals. Realistically if the Luongo deal happened in September everyone would be celebrating Gillis for getting the elusive 3rd line centre and the top ranked goalie prospect. The only problem is the canucks problems have grown larger than just missing the third line centre and Marstrom has had a bad year and the return suddenly looks terrible. With respect to Kesler we all would have been outraged if a trade was made for another third line centre, a mid level prospect and what essentially equates to a high 2nd round draft pick. Maybe we will get even less at the draft but with getting so little in that deal it can't be much worse.

Avatar
#11 GeezMoney
March 08 2014, 06:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

There is a weird strain of thought in the comments section here thst by keeping Kesler, Gillis effed up. In the end, Kesler is worth more to the Canucks than overrated centre, a B-level prospect and low value draft picks. He'll fetch more than that at the draft. You can bank on that.

Avatar
#12 JD Burke
March 09 2014, 02:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
GeezMoney wrote:

There is a weird strain of thought in the comments section here thst by keeping Kesler, Gillis effed up. In the end, Kesler is worth more to the Canucks than overrated centre, a B-level prospect and low value draft picks. He'll fetch more than that at the draft. You can bank on that.

Finally someone is making sense... Someone other than me, that is.

Comments are closed for this article.