Lessons from 2006: the Alexander Auld story

Cam Charron
March 24 2014 01:10PM

56440462
Team MVP for the Vancouver Canucks back in '05-'06, pictured above.

Quick trivia question: who was the last Vancouver Canucks goaltender to start a game before Roberto Luongo took over in October of 2006? It wasn't Alex Auld, even though Auld was handed the reigns down the stretch drive of the 2005-2006 season as the Canucks pushed for a playoff spot.

Auld made 67 appearances for Vancouver in 05-06 after beginning the season as Dan Cloutier's backup. Cloutier got hurt (as is tradition) after 13 games with an 8-3-1 record and would never start a game for the Canucks ever again. The Canucks, in a race for the Presidents' Trophy after the first month, slumped for the rest of the season. Auld and his .902 save percentage - which was 21st in the NHL among regulars that season - was named the Team MVP (Cyclone Taylor Trophy), a fact that never sat well with me considering that by any objective measure, Auld wasn't convincingly the best goalie on his own team.

As I watched Eddie Lack last night though, and kept an eye on James Reimer's performance, I thought of something. How many times did Auld have to start both halves of a back-to-back? The Canucks are currently leaning on Lack right now and have started him in every game since the Olympic break. That's a workload that we haven't seen placed on a Vancouver goaltender since 2007. In Toronto, Reimer's stock is dwindling quickly but the Leafs don't have any choice but to start him in back-to-backs with their other 'tender out with injury.

Overall, Auld started both halves of a back-to-back nine times in 2005-2006. Had CanucksArmy existed in its current form back then, we'd have demanded Marc Crawford shipped out of town faster than you can say "hair gel" is a raspy, high-pitched squeal.

That's not all.

In the second half of those back-to-back games, which were all on the road and some of which were in dangerous locales. Two of his six losses in those nine games came against Edmonton, the team that wound up winning the Western Conference that year, and another was against Calgary, who had of course gone to the final the previous season and were Northwest Division champions in 2006.

Still, what's amazing is how well Auld played, considering the circumstances. Auld had a .907 save percentage in those nine games on the second half of a back-to-back, compared to his season average .902 on at least one day of rest. The team itself, however, wasn't strong in those games. They gave up 32.6 shots against per 60 minutes for poor Auldy compared to 29.7 in other games. Of course, that's spurred by other factors (all games were on the road and skaters also suffer symptoms from fatigue) but the circumstances weren't going Auld's way that season. He was set up to fail.

Put it this way: Dan Cloutier's last start for Vancouver was November 20, or Game 21 of the season. The Canucks still had 61 games to go and would be in the playoff hunt for 60 of those games.

Alex Auld would start 56 of them.

Not all in a row, mind you. Crawford wasn't stupid. He just had such little faith in his backup goaltenders. For a while, the Canucks had Robert McVicar, until they went to the waiver wire to claim Maxime Ouellet from Washington, ere trading a 2nd round pick to Buffalo for Mika Noronen on March 9.

Noronen, for the record, would start just twice in his tenure as a Canuck. He'd start four days later in Nashville, played a bad game, and Crawford went right back to Auld until the Canucks were eliminated from contention. Noronen started the last game of the season, a 4-3 overtime win over the Colorado Avalanche.

Back to Lack.

Lack has started 13 consecutive since the Olympic break, and the second half of a back-to-back just once. Auld is not impressed.

After Crawford determined that Maxime Ouellet was six ways from useless, Auld started ten consecutive games between January 2 and 21 in 2006, including four games which were the front and back ends of a back-to-back.

Auld started ten in a row again before the Olympics (broken up so Ouellet could lose the front half of a back-to-back in St. Louis) he'd come back and start seven more consecutive after the break. Noronen came in against Nashville, lost, and then Auld went in for fourteen consecutive before, presumably, his knees had the density of a particularly soggy batch of baked potatoes.

I guess you could say that Lack is within one of the team record of consecutive starts by the surprise No. 1 goalie. Could've been you, Mike Fountain.

The Lack-Auld comparison may seem a bit forced, but watching Lack last night I had a mental recollection of Auld's role down the stretch that year. Nobody expected Eddie Lack to be in this position back in October, just as nobody thought Auld would start 64 games for the Canucks coming out of the lockout. His numbers aren't particularly good, but what do you really expect when you lean on a guy that you need to be perfect to give your team a shot?

This also means that Jakob "Whereabouts Unknown" Markstrom may be the answer to some snarky trivia question asked on a blog post eight years from today. John Tortorella has hit the ground running with Lack and doesn't have any reason to cut his workload: the team has just two more back-to-backs the rest of the way and the Canucks still have an outside shot at the playoffs.

Info compiled by cross-referencing six different Hockey-Reference pages, which is a real pain to do on Amtrak Wi-Fi.

63811cbf517d2d685ea09e103488ea3a
Cam Charron is a BC hockey fan that writes about hockey on many different websites including this one.
Avatar
#1 Fred-65
March 24 2014, 02:34PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Props
3
props

@Chungus

Please please lets think of Luongo as being traded to the planet of Jupiter or some place. He's gone he didn't want to be here and he never won any thing for this franchise. He is in Florida with his wifes foot firmly on his neck ...or where ever and that all we need to think of. Lack I have to believe is in the next phase of his development playing as much as he has and will return next year all the better for it. Markstrom hopefully will benefit from the coaching of Melanson.

Avatar
#2 NM00
March 24 2014, 01:51PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
8
props

If the goal is to, at minimum, contend for a playoff spot in 2014-2015, I can't see how the organization can bring both parts of the Lack/Markstrom tandem back next season.

The 5 worst teams in the NHL employ a tandem like Vancouver's.

And if the organization is unwilling to give Markstrom a shot, why acquire him in the first place...

Avatar
#3 NM00
March 24 2014, 02:13PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
6
props

@Chungus

But the .894 save percentage of Canuck goalies since the trade will benefit the long term needs of the franchise more than Lou ever could have...

Avatar
#4 Chungus
March 24 2014, 01:59PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
8
props

I miss Luongo.

Avatar
#5 aristocritic
March 24 2014, 03:46PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
0
props

Mika Noronen was also traded for BUF's 2nd Round pick that eventually became the pick that Milan Lucic was picked with....

Dont blame GMMG for that.. you gotta thank the two idiots called Burkie and Nonis for that... you two fkn idiots!

Avatar
#7 NM00
March 24 2014, 04:43PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
2
props

@Cam Charron

Every loss of point in the standings may help improve the draft position.

It`s not as though these guys have a sterling track record of NHL success.

A combined .905 career save percentage, though we're only talking about 2,100 shots.

Combine the lack of experience with poor performance to date and this is one of the worst tandems in the NHL...

Avatar
#8 Salient89
March 24 2014, 01:22PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
9
props

After seeing all the claims that CanucksArmy hates prospects I would like to promote this as the point in case article for that line of thinking.

Avatar
#9 acg5151
March 24 2014, 01:52PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
7
props

We may have had Alex Auld but at least we never had..... Vesa Toskala.

Loleafs

Avatar
#10 PB
March 24 2014, 03:43PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

@NM00

Exactly -- I don't understand it at all. It's not as if Markstrom has done nothing to turn around his own season -- didn't he win AHL goalie of the month just before the trade? If Jensen can get a shot with a hot streak why not Markstrom? And why would Tortorella undermine him by saying he's not ready?

Both he and Lack aren't comparable to Auld, who was a career backup other than that year or in a platoon wherever else he played (even junior).

Avatar
#11 NM00
March 24 2014, 03:54PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
7
props

@PB

I'll always have a soft spot for Auld as he played just well enough to be a piece in the Luongo trade...

Markstrom isn't playing for the same reasons the prospects were not given a chance (again) in the name of veterans.

This management team is going to continue to fight tooth and nail for a playoff spot every single year until they are mercifully terminated.

And that means "veteran presence" instead of living with the growing pains associated with young players.

It's clear that Vigneault was not the issue...

Avatar
#12 NM00
March 24 2014, 03:57PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
4
props

@aristocritic

How dare Burke and Nonis bring Sedin, Sedin, Burrows, Raymond, Kesler, Grabner, Pyatt, Morrison, Hansen, Edler, Bieksa, Salo, Mitchell, Bourdon (RIP), Luongo & Schneider into the organization and leave the foundation for the 2011 SCF team on a platter...

Avatar
#14 Lemming
March 24 2014, 05:33PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

I remember Auld for being a decent goalie in a crummy situation who still went out and played hard every night (even if he was never much of a lateral movement kind of guy, kind of important for a goalie). We'll see where Lack goes...

Odds are, the era of great goaltending is just generally over in Vancouver, seeing as they traded away someone extremely likely to be placed in the HHoF, and is considered to have been elite through his entire career.

On a related note to Lack's save % so far after the break, I don't think Jensen or Kassian got the memo about tanking. Someone tell them to stop picking up points.

Avatar
#15 That's Offside!
March 24 2014, 06:16PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
6
props
Salient89 wrote:

After seeing all the claims that CanucksArmy hates prospects I would like to promote this as the point in case article for that line of thinking.

CanucksArmy doesn't hate prospects. That's just me.

Avatar
#16 Ruprecht
March 25 2014, 11:03AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props
Chungus wrote:

I miss Luongo.

I miss Johan Hedberg.

Avatar
#17 Zach Morris
March 25 2014, 01:36PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
3
props

@Ruprecht

Easily my favorite Canucks goaltender until Luongo came along. I did a speech on him in grade 4!

Avatar
#18 PB
March 25 2014, 03:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@Ruprecht

I miss Garth Snow, when he was so punchy

Avatar
#19 Ruprecht
March 25 2014, 09:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@Zach Morris

He would have retired a Canuck if it weren't for Crow. (Just Kidding) Guy had a long career for basically being a cast-off. I'd say his stone is slightly bigger than Bob Essensa's in the graveyard.

@PB Sean Burke gets my vote. He also did much better against Barnaby.

Avatar
#20 J21
March 26 2014, 01:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Fred-65 wrote:

Please please lets think of Luongo as being traded to the planet of Jupiter or some place. He's gone he didn't want to be here and he never won any thing for this franchise. He is in Florida with his wifes foot firmly on his neck ...or where ever and that all we need to think of. Lack I have to believe is in the next phase of his development playing as much as he has and will return next year all the better for it. Markstrom hopefully will benefit from the coaching of Melanson.

I hate the phrase "never won anything" as used by North American sports fans. Luongo won LITERALLY EVERYTHING in Vancouver except Game 7 of the Stanley Cup. To make zero distinction between a guy who had massive success and a preseason flameout is just ludicrous. If you mean "the Stanley Cup," say "the Stanley Cup". Does not equal "anything".

For the record, I got the Noronen trivia question. Woot, me!

Comments are closed for this article.