Brad Boyes, Brad Boyes, Whatcha Gonna Do, Whatcha Gonna Do When They Come For You?

Dimitri Filipovic
March 01 2014 02:54PM

940x
Image via Pat Carter

[This post was written by JD Burke. If that name sounds familiar, it's because you've probably either seen him on Twitter, or read the handful of Evening Headshots posts he has done for us in the past. Anyways, he ran this thought-provoking article on Brad Boyes which he wrote by me, and I figured I'd share it with all of you.] 

Every offseason it feels as though a swathe of worthy contributors are cast aside in the rush to overspend for marginally better players, with a slew of complementary narratives that give the illusion of talent - see Clarkson, David. 

Last summer, these contract-worthy players gathered en masse in Florida, courtesy of professional tryouts from Dale Tallon and the Panthers. One such player was Brad Boyes; he of the 40-goal campaign once upon a time, and consequent free-fall from grace only two seasons later.

At this point we all know he’s available. The Panthers are 15th in the Eastern Conference and 17 points out of a wild card spot. In true Florida Panthers form, that screams "trade deadline seller". With that being the case I think it’s well worth exploring whether Boyes should be on the Canucks radar. And do that I shall, right after the jump.

The most fascinating thing about Boyes’ career has been how easily he fooled the league into believing he was an elite talent and conversely what a difficult time he’s had convincing them he can be of any value since. 

From '07-'09, Boyes lit the lamp 76 times in 164 games (including the aforementioned 43 goal season). Just a few seasons later, he only managed 23 points in 65 games with the Sabres, after the Blues had discarded him (setting a trend for years to come). The drop-off - and maybe even more importantly the speed at which it happened - was significant. But as is often the case, the increased expectations that came with Boyes’ most productive season were never fair to begin with, and the 23 point season wasn't exactly completely his fault, either.

What seemed to get lost in this sudden decline in production was the quality of linemates and the cruel mistress that is regression. Even the least analytical of observers had to expect Boyes’ shooting percentage to drop from his career high of 21%, which, believe it or not, coincided with his most productive season.

Screen Shot 2014-03-01 at 1.15.38 PM

[Note: Rate, percentile, and linemate stats are all exclusively at 5v5]

There are several interesting things to take away from this chart. First of all, to quote one Cam Charron, “regression is real”. Not only is regression real, but it kicked Boyes’ ass between 2009-12; his shot rates remained impressive, but the goals were nowhere to be found. 

Another takeaway from is that, not so surprisingly, the league all but gave up on Boyes after an injury-riddled season spent playing primarily with Ville Leino. Up to that season, Boyes had produced at a rate one would generally consider commensurate with your average, if not above average, second line winger.

Now that we've got a framework to work with, let's shift this angle to a more relevant discussion for this platform. Where exactly would Boyes fit in with the Canucks? Well, just about anywhere. One of the better aspects of Boyes’ game is his ability to shift from scorer to distributor, according to his linemates. And with rumours swirling that Ryan Kesler is either set to be dealt, it’s also worth noting that Boyes has played center in the past; albeit not very well, as his 2011-12 campaign will attest. Heck, even if Kesler isn't dealt (which would be great), Boyes can help mitigate the loss of Santorelli.

And, before you ask, the answer is yes, Boyes *can* help out the power play. Even in his worst season, Boyes was a relatively useful part of the Buffalo Sabres power play. This season Boyes is averaging over two minutes of power play time per game with the Panthers.

With the trade deadline just days away, the Canucks are going to have to decide whether they are buyers or… stand pat-ers (NTCs, and so on). Quite frankly, I can’t imagine the Canucks stay mired in their current state of self-loathing and inept offense much longer, and when they snap out of this funk (please, soon, I'm dying) we’ll all have a clearer picture of Mike Gillis’ intentions.

The beauty of a pick-up like Boyes is that he won’t cost enough to be a detriment to the team’s long-term future, whatever that may be. Wrongly or otherwise, Boyes’ name carries a lot of baggage and as such the Panthers can’t expect much more than a third-rounder for him - if that.

Consider, if you will, that when the Sabres picked Boyes up, with the hopes that he would breathe life into their anemic offense and center their second line, he cost them just a second-rounder. That was before the 23-point season. The future of the Canucks, even in Gillis’ hand, can’t rest solely in the place of a mid-round pick. But the ability to show confidence in your team, through offensive additions like the one I just lobbied for, and potentially even give the Canucks that last push back into the playoffs, is right there and readily available.

Based on the Canucks history of trades with Florida, I can understand any and all reservation to my proposed move for Boyes. That said, maybe the third time's a charm?

7482b25b962fb1661ea9028fb4e0db36
Dimitri Filipovic writes about hockey on the internet, and is the Managing Editor of Canucks Army. You can follow him on Twitter @DimFilipovic, and email him at dimitri.filipovic@gmail.com.
Avatar
#1 J.D. Burke
March 01 2014, 03:02PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
10
props

I think that this J.D. Burke guy is a genius IMO and he should write more stuff.

Avatar
#2 JFR
March 01 2014, 04:27PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

I feel like a guy going back to a poker table after losing a couple of times and thinking....... I can't lose everytime, right"

If MG is going to do something, it would be a minor tweet with a Santorelli like upside. I don't believe that a Kessler type trade will develop in a week. Unless some team gets very desperate.

Avatar
#3 Rustybee
March 01 2014, 08:00PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
0
props

@JFR

#JDB_SelfPatOnTheBack

Avatar
#4 Marsh
March 02 2014, 12:35PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props
J.D. Burke wrote:

I think that this J.D. Burke guy is a genius IMO and he should write more stuff.

But...but, I don't WANT help on the PP this season. For what? Two home games in the playoffs? This is the rebuild-retool-re-load season where injuries are a legitimate excuse not to make the playoffs just before the cap goes way up and the Canucks unload at least the Booth contract. The trade deadline, not the draft is the very best time to move vets.

Other than that, yeah that Burke fella is pro-caliber. And nearly as objective as the NM00 character.

Avatar
#5 J.D. Burke
March 02 2014, 05:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@Marsh

so what you're saying is that you're a big fan of my writing? Thank you

Avatar
#6 Marsh
March 02 2014, 05:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
J.D. Burke wrote:

so what you're saying is that you're a big fan of my writing? Thank you

I do like your article. Don't like the premise, tongue in cheek or otherwise, that the Canucks should make the playoffs. :-)

Avatar
#7 J.D. Burke
March 04 2014, 01:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Marsh

Aw, why thank you. My bad on picking up tone there haha. And yeah, I wrote this last Wednesday, in my defense. There was SOME hope then... le sigh.

Comments are closed for this article.