The culture of Torts

The Stanchion
January 21 2014 10:56AM

Luongo 300
(Picture courtesy of me)

As all of Canucks Nation knows by now (except for the three of you who don't, but even you three have to admit you suspected something was up) John Tortorella has been suspended 15 days by the NHL for his part in the Brawl for All that took place Saturday between the Flames and Canucks. This comes hot off of the heels of one of the worst stretches of the season for the Canucks in which they lost many games, but also got in many fights. So many fights.... *stares into the distance wistfully*..

A funny thing happened after the suspension to Torts was announced, though; the majority of fans weren't complaining about the Canucks on ice play. Nobody was angry and bemoaning another Edler turnover. Nobody was wondering why Jason Garrison was making it his sole purpose in life to ruin the happiness of Canucks fans everywhere. No, for the most part people were defiantly supporting their coach. As only Roberto Luongo himself can put it....

A quick search of that hash tag on twitter reveals a ton of people jumping on board, declaring their support of the coach, despite all of the recent losses. Sure, some of that can be attributed to people parroting whatever hash tag Luongo puts out (If he put out #FreePoops as a hash tag, that would also be abnormally popular, I assure you) but for people who have been watching the Canucks fans reactions this year, you will notice it is just another sign of the Torts movement as people continue to get more and more on board Torts' approach to the game.

In a town where a three game losing streak is akin to having your arm torn off by a rogue tractor, Canucks Nation is surprisingly positive in their support of Torts. Why you ask? Well I'm glad you asked, but the answer to that lies all the way back in 2011....

*Time travel montage*

Ah, 2011, a time when all was well in Canucks land. The Sedins were dominating like never before. Christian Ehrhoff had made Patrick White jokes en vogue again. Raffi Torres was decapitating people left and right (ok so some things haven't changed). It was the best Canucks team of all time, statistically speaking, and let's be honest, in every other category you could think of. There was just one problem: Every single person outside of the Vancouver fan base apparently hated that team.

It was really weird how united people got in their hatred of the Canucks. That team, by all accounts, was not a cheap shot team (Raffi Torres aside). They weren't particularly mean spirited. Did they have some skaters with questionable diving skills on their resume? Of course! Lapierre, Burrows, and Kesler are not exactly innocent when it comes to diving, or yapping for that matter. The thing is, every team in the league either has, or has had, questionable players on its roster, and again, it is not like the Canucks were the worst team of all time in any bad category. They were a highly skilled team that would kill you on the power play and would simply out score you at will. Yet for some reason, as the 2011 playoffs wore on, more and more people simply despised Vancouver.

Was it simply a case of people reacting to the, sometimes annoyingly so, boisterous Canucks fan base? That probably played a part, but it still felt like there was something oddly personal about everyone outside of Vancouver actively hoping for Vancouver to fail in their Cup aspirations. As a result, not a day went by when people wouldn't pile on the Canucks, and one of the biggest narratives running was about how the Canucks team was a bunch of "pussies". If it wasn't the Sedin sisters using their purse to body check, it was Burrows being a coward, or Lapierre being a pansy, or the team equipment manager wearing white after Labor Day. Basically the 2011 Canucks team was painted as this sad sack of cowardly players that didn't deserve to win a thing because they didn't play hockey "the right way".

Things got so bad that at one point Brad Marchand was viewed as some sort of saint for punching Daniel Sedin in the face multiple times without a physical response from Daniel. Seriously, Daniel Sedin was vilified for this, and Brad Marchand of all people was celebrated. That's like listening to your mother tell you how exciting it was when your ex-wife that cheated on you took you for all your money in divorce court. Marchand was playing "real" hockey and showing those pussy Canucks how hockey was meant to be played! YEAH!

*crushes beer can on head*

The entire mantra of the 2011 team could be summed up as the "Turn the Other Cheek" era, because that is what Vigneault preached that season. The Canucks would glow as they spoke about the "Lapierre rehab" project, where they brought in a lippy Lapierre and within 5 days of his personality re-assignment therapy, he emerged as a shutdown fourth line center with impeccable table manners. Vigneault's vision for the Canucks was to not retaliate and to make sure to not get involved with any rough stuff. AV wanted his players to ignore the after whistle affairs and simply dominate the other team on the powerplay and get the win.

"Make them pay on the powerplay!" was a war cry Vigneault would use often, in between sucking on his lozenges. This "Turn the Other Cheek" movement reached its zenith when Sami Salo made the Sharks cry for mercy with two powerplay goals in 16 seconds in game four of the Western Finals. It was at its nadir when the Canucks power play absolutely disappeared against the Bruins in the Finals as the Bruins physically dominated the Canucks en route to winning the Cup.

Canucks Nation emerged from the 2011 Finals saddened by losing to a team that used brawn to beat their skill. They were frustrated that a team with so much skill as that 2011 team was being shit on by seemingly everyone outside of the Vancouver market for “not playing tough”. The last two years of Vigneault the "Canucks are pussies" narrative continued until it went out with a whimper when AV was finally let go in the 2013 off-season.

Enter John Tortorella.

Tortorella is known for being a fiery coach, and if it can be said that teams will often reflect the personality of their coaches, this theory gains even more merit when looking at Torts led teams. Under Torts the Canucks have become viewed as a much tougher team. Whether it is because Tom Sestito leads the league in penalty minutes, whether it's because the Canucks now block a ton of shots (blocking shots = manly), or whether it's because Torts himself will often scream behind the bench (Vigneault was known for laughing behind the bench or sucking his lozenges, the disparity between the two probably couldn't get any greater), the Canucks are now viewed quite differently.

This of course is highlighted by the Torts suspension for attempting to charge into the Flames dressing room to yell at Bob Hartley for trying to goon it up against "his boys". Let's compare the Torts approach to the AV approach for a second:

John Tortorella charges into the opposing locker room to yell at the coach to defend his players.

Alain Vigneault laughs at the memory of Matt Cooke screwing up a two on one.

John Tortorella yells to the press about people calling the Sedins soft.

Alain Vigneault giggles uncontrollably when someone asks him if Wellwood is "playing like a man possessed."

John Tortorella will frankly tell the media that Zack Kassian is a project player that needs a lot of work.

Alain Vigneault is most likely unaware who Zack Kassian is. He most ilkely giggled at some point.

Again, you could not draw up better polar opposites in coaches than these two. 

Now, Torts' popularity could simply be a case of him being a rebound coach after a long relationship with AV. If you look at all of AV's "faults", Torts is the opposite, so he looks even better in comparison. For all we know if Torts had been here for 9 years and AV was the one to take over, people would be lauding AV for his much calmer approach to hockey, and complimenting his laid back style and nice track suits.

Regardless of why people in Vancouver are so open to Torts style, it is exacerbated by the optics of it all. This is a fan base that had its team being made fun of for being too soft for many many years. Fast forward four years, and now the team is being jeered for being "too dirty". It's almost like this Canucks team can do no right in the eyes of many.

As a result of all of this, Torts is now becoming a central figure in Canucks Nation for his sometimes abbrasive style. If you realize that people will hate you no matter what, you kind of want to feel defiant to all of that. If people are going to hate you, part of you wants to give them a reason to hate you.

If people are going to make fun of your team, sometimes there is nothing better than seeing a coach stand up for the team and its players, giving a metaphorical "**** you" to people who aren't a fan of the team. It's not the fights themselves that make you cheer, it's watching team mates stand up for other team mates that brings a smile to many faces. Sports is based on very primal emotions, so it's easy to get swept away in the comraderie of players "having each others backs."

That is why, in my humblest opinion, the #FreeTorts ideology is taking off. That is why people are supporting this scrappy team and not complaining as much. Sure, people are still discussing the failures of the team (I am sure someone on Canucks Army as we speak is writing an article about how fighting adds nothing statistically to the team) but those failures have finally made their way onto the front door of Mike Gillis. Now it is Gillis who is being viewed as the guy who needs to fix the team, and not the coach.

This is why Torts is gaining popularity in Vancouver. This team is a shell of its 2011 glory, and many people are starting to realize that. So if the team is going to have to claw and scrape their way into the playoffs, they might as well play tough and stop backing down from confrontation. It’s therapeutic in a sense for the fan base because they might as well see what happens when they play tougher, since they lost with their most skilled team of all time.

For a fan base that had to watch Brad Marchand being celebrated for punching Daniel in the face, there is something very satisfying watching Bieksa stand in to fight on Kellen Lain’s behalf, or for Torts to run down the hallways screaming for blood.

Let's face it, it's a lot easier to rally behind Torts, full of passion and fighting on the teams behalf,  then it is to rally behind Vigneault, who came across more like an aloof step-father, one whom you're not quite sure if he'll invite you back over to Christmas next year. If the Canucks are going to lose this year, they are going to lose united as a team, which is better than going out with a whimper in a first round sweep for the third straight year.

In closing, #FreeTorts.

Also, #FreePoops. 

Ed73c95199a7c52e70a7ff5fe66a1e13
Current freelance writer for The Province and Canucks Army. You can find me on twitter @thestanchion screaming about sports and making fun of Eddie Lack's gaming skills.
Avatar
#51 Unknown Comic
January 21 2014, 03:40PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
12
props
The Stanchion wrote:

At this point I imagine your pants are firmly around your ankles as you masturbate to all the negative attention you're creating, so I'll let you finish giving your posts a thumbs up so you can end "happy alone time" before 3.

Welcome aboard Stanchion. What you're responding to has grown pretty old around here.

The need to take a contrarian view while labeling everyone "groupthinkers" gives one a feeling of superiority, that is clearly sought to hide some obvious insecurities.

One is then too confused by the negative reactions to understand most people agree one's points are actually worthy of discussion and questioning. It's not what is said, but rather how things are said, that makes one look like a d!ck.

Avatar
#53 NM00
January 21 2014, 04:00PM
Trash it!
17
trashes
Props
3
props

That's the wonderful thing about the internet.

One can turn a blogger into a father figure to satiate one's psychological needs while projecting one's insecurites on the "other".

And the blogger may choose bravado instead of a cogent, thought provoking response because, well, everyone has a voice...

Avatar
#55 Unknown Comic
January 21 2014, 04:29PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
1
props
The Stanchion wrote:

2 minutes ago:

http://i44.tinypic.com/211trat.png

He is a feisty one, but resorting to the "I know you are but what am I" schtick reeks of obtuse desperation.

Avatar
#57 Ruprecht
January 21 2014, 04:41PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
4
props
NM00 wrote:

That's the wonderful thing about the internet.

One can turn a blogger into a father figure to satiate one's psychological needs while projecting one's insecurites on the "other".

And the blogger may choose bravado instead of a cogent, thought provoking response because, well, everyone has a voice...

Welcome to the lowest common denominator, Signed Mr. Kettle.

Avatar
#58 Nat
January 21 2014, 04:50PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
11
props

@The Stanchion

"Look, I get that your gimmick is the person who sees things for what they are, who isn't a homer, blah blah blah, but if you're going to make comments, it would be more fun if we just had a civil back forth. It's easy to be a dick online for no reason but I invite you to try an actual back and forth where we don't get snarky for no reason."

/stands /applauds

Avatar
#59 NM00
January 21 2014, 04:57PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Props
2
props
The Stanchion wrote:

It's not so much I know you are but what am I, but more of an indictment of his unending belief in himself never being wrong.

Regardless, that was my last comment on the matter.

And I hope that was as cathartic as you seem to need it to be...

Avatar
#60 Ted
January 21 2014, 05:32PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
6
props
The Stanchion wrote:

That's the thing, I love having a good-natured back and forth with people as we debate sports. Half of the fun of sports is breaking down and talking about them. Hell, I gain better insight into sports by talking to people with other view points as it gives me a broader view of things.

It's just yeah, people need to present it in a civil way. Online arguments too often dissolve into snark.

Anyways, glad to be on board, there is a great group of people who visit this site, I am excited to talk hockey with you all.

Most of us do add some useful info then there's NegativeMoron00. He loves the attention! He is a hairy little troll and that's OK. He entertains me and it's good fun poking at him.

Some note he may make an odd good point but that is drowned out because of his attitude and the simple fact he is a c*cksucker (yes, you may buy a vowel). Anyway, just laugh and point at the little weasel and then let's talk hockey. :)

Avatar
#61 Ted
January 21 2014, 05:34PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
5
props
The Stanchion wrote:

It's not so much I know you are but what am I, but more of an indictment of his unending belief in himself never being wrong.

Regardless, that was my last comment on the matter.

But that's some of the entertainment! People that behave the way he does and think we don't see through him. It really is fun because you can do it from a distance...I've said it before, he's one of those guys you hear about in the paper...you know...managed to get some ammo and guns then got on a roof top and started shooting...he is that kind of mental

Avatar
#62 PB
January 21 2014, 05:54PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
6
props

@The Stanchion

Honestly, there really is no point even trying to have much of a conversation with him. He labels anyone who doesn't accept him as the one true thinker and savior mindless and insists upon trumpeting his opinions as though they were the final word. He either doesn't understand the politics or practices of the game (i.e. yes all teams are subject to the same cap but clearly not all teams have the same capacity or constraints) and is blinded by his general hate for Gillis.

But whatever his opinions are (and some of them are good) it's his general attitude and being a dink that eventually gets under some peoples' skin.

Oh my god. I just figured it out. NM00 is Bob Hartley. And we are all collectively Tortorella. We've got to stop letting him push our buttons...

Avatar
#63 brawlfiSh
January 21 2014, 06:24PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
3
props

Amen brotha man.

Everything in this article is the pulse of Canucks nation.

How this all translates in a 7 game series... well that's what I can't wait to find out.

Avatar
#64 Thomas Drance
January 21 2014, 11:54PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
8
props

Well it looks like the Stanchion vs. NM00 threads are going to be pretty epic going forward!

Welcome Wyatt you old pro, so pumped to have you on board at CA!

Avatar
#65 wes
January 22 2014, 02:23AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props

i'm getting depressed learning about NM00. great article Stanchion! from my vantage point, i think you nailed it.

Avatar
#66 Ted
January 22 2014, 10:50AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
3
props
Thomas Drance wrote:

Well it looks like the Stanchion vs. NM00 threads are going to be pretty epic going forward!

Welcome Wyatt you old pro, so pumped to have you on board at CA!

I don't think it's much of a versus situation when 99% of the people can't take Negator00 seriously and the Stanch makes some positive points. I'm surprised people actually try and engage NoMind00 in serious conversation - they all eventually learn :)

Avatar
#67 NM00
January 22 2014, 11:24AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
4
props

@Thomas Drance

It's just going to be Joe Morgan vs Keith Law.

No matter how experienced Joe Morgan may be...

Avatar
#68 Ted
January 23 2014, 12:52AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
3
props
NM00 wrote:

It's just going to be Joe Morgan vs Keith Law.

No matter how experienced Joe Morgan may be...

Nah. JackArse00 isn't taken seriously enough to oppose anyone. Who takes that douche seriously?

Comments are closed for this article.