Canucks Army Postgame: Dick Panik in Vancouver

Dimitri Filipovic
January 02 2014 10:51AM


Image via @CrownRoyal22 

Reading some of the postgame quotes you'd think that Wednesday night's lackluster effort v. the Lightning was something we'd become accustomed to seeing as part of a worrying trend, rather than an aberration. But with a 10-1-2 month of December in the rearview mirror, I think it's fair to say it's far more of the latter than the former, and we should take this performance for what it is: an outlier more than anything else.

After losing a game a few days ago in which they had really deserved a better fate v. the Flyers, the right team won this time around. John Tortorella hit the nail right on the head when he said the following, "that's a team effort. It is probably our worst game of the year. We deserved to lose that one and we did.”

You sure did, Torts. Read on past the jump for a deeper look at what went wrong.

The Rundown

The first 10 minutes or so were really difficult to digest as an observer, with basically nothing overly noteworthy taking place. In my notes the only thing - other than "ZzZzzZzzZzz" - I have written down is "it's probably not a good sign for this game that by far the most exciting moment so far featured Tom Sestito landing a hit on Nikita Kucherov seconds after Dale Weise missed".

It was that bad. But as the opening frame went along the Canucks seemed to finally wake up from their slumber, putting some pressure on Ben Bishop and Co. David Booth had the best two chances, both generated from crashing the net, but neither amounted to anything more than that. Zack Kassian is still stuck sitting on 2 assists for the year, but based on some of the passes he has been dishing out recently, that has far more to do with the inability of his teammates to finish than anything he's doing wrong. 

Early on in the 2nd period Chris Tanev left the game with some sort of injury (don't worry, he returned and didn't seem to show any ill effects), and the penalty kill looked horrifically lost without him. The coverage in the defensive zone was brutal, and if you replay that sequence ten times the Lightning probably score on 7 or 8 of them.

.. but Tanev came back, and the penalty kill looked much better when thrust into action again just a couple of minutes later. I guess you could say that the #POWERKILL was officially back to being itself. After having killed off what you'd probably classify as a "bad penalty" (with Higgins unnecessarily tripping up a defender in the offensive zone), Dan Hamhuis stepped up and separated Richard Panik (the man behind the headline of this post) from the puck with a perfectly timed check, setting up the opening goal. It was Richardson's 8th of the year which found its way past Bishop:

He didn't get an assist on the play, but man, you can't help but appreciate that play by Hamhuis. He logged 29:29 on Wednesday night, and enjoyed himself a fine bounceback performance following what was a dreadful showing last time out. Still, I'm baffled as to why the coaching staff continues to trot him out their on the top PP unit, especially considering how big a load he has to carry in the other areas of the game with all of the injuries the team is dealing with. It's inexplicable, really. Maybe the reason Glen Gulutzan never seems to show any emotion is because he's actually sleeping?

Anyways, it was the next couple of minutes following Richardson's goal that initially made me consider going with a headline of "And then a hockey game broke out!". I settled for the bad, but kind of good joke, which makes sense to those of you that know me. There were 4 total goals in the final 270 seconds of the 2nd period, ultimately leaving the Canucks trailing 3-2.

The one bright spot from that sequence was the following goal by Zac Dalpe, his first as a member of the Canucks. That was a blown call that should've been an icing, but still, look at the freakin' pass by Dale Weise to set Dalpe up. My goodness. Weise and Sestito finished just behind Kesler and Yannick Weber on the top Corsi For % list for the night, and actually had themselves a really nice night. I've been openly critical of Sestito for a long time now, but I have to give credit where its due, and he has been (relatively speaking) much better lately. Those two spent most of their 7+ minutes of action throwing their bodies around, causing havoc, and if they keep doing that, I will keep singing their praises.

The Canucks pressed the Lightning right out of the gate to start the 3rd, but couldn't beat Bishop, and after a quick insurance tally by Alex Killorn - whose line, featuring Valterri Filppula, gave the Canucks fits all night - that was pretty much all she wrote.

I know that Lack has now surrendered 7 goals in his past 2 games and what not, but once again, I think he was far down the list of reasons the team lost this game. The 2nd goal was a perfectly placed shot by Filppula while using David Booth as a screen, the 3rd was a wicked snipe by Kucherov following Higgins' inability to get the puck out on the PK, and the 4th was a point shot which took a nasty re-direct. I guess he was due for some bad luck following the torrid start to his NHL career, but I still have the utmost confidence in his ability to handle the job in backup duties when Luongo comes back this weekend.

The Numbers


Image via Extra Skater

Martin St.Louis simply cannot be human. He logged over 22 minutes in this one, and was on the ice for 21 shot attempts for v. only 9 against, while seeing roughly an even dose of the Canucks' top 2 lines.

On defense for the Canucks, Jason Garrison's log was interesting. He finished with the 2nd worst shot attempt differential on the team (18-25), and spent most of his night with either Bieksa or Weber. Bieksa also finished with a negative differential, and was directy responsible for Tyler Johnson's goal as he really poorly handled a pinch in the OZ. Weber on the other hand led the team with a 63.6 CF%, and is really looking like he's gaining more and more confidence with each game. I'm not sure what more he can do to earn himself at least a temporary look on the top PP unit, though..

Ryan Kesler's line has now been out on the ice for 5 goals against over the past 2, but despite once again not looking like the dominant two-way juggernaut that they had for the majority of December, they were much better than they were against Giroux's line. Quite frankly I think the outcome in this game would've been much different had the Sedins shown up, but they didn't.. they saw a lot of Killorn/Filppula, and finished with a sub-50% possession game.

Simply not good enough from those two, and when you combine that with the 2nd line's struggles and the goaltending being less than perfect, it's not exactly difficult to see why they came up on the short end.

The Conclusion

I don't think there's much reason to actually panic here, for two reasons. First off, heading into this game the Canucks had been playing some really strong hockey for the past month or so, and even when they had like v. Philadelphia the other day they still more than held their own. It had been quite a while since we'd seen them lay an egg like this, so it's hard to get too worked up about it. These things happen.

And it's not like they threw the game away to a garbage team, either, because I think the Tampa Bay Lightning are pretty darn good. Recently Elliotte Friedman said that he thought that only the Penguins and Bruins would make the playoffs in the West out of all of the teams from the East. With all due respect to Friedge, I think the Bolts would be right up there fighting for a spot. 

There is one problem though and it's the upcoming schedule for the Canucks. Their next 6 games are as follows: @LA, @ANA, v. PIT, v. STL, @LA, @ ANA, @PHX. That's pretty darn tough, and the way they handle that stretch will go a long way towards determining their fate in the jam-packed Western Conference standings.

7482b25b962fb1661ea9028fb4e0db36
Dimitri Filipovic writes about hockey on the internet, and is the Managing Editor of Canucks Army. You can follow him on Twitter @DimFilipovic, and email him at dimitri.filipovic@gmail.com.
Avatar
#1 Matt
January 02 2014, 11:20AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
6
props

The first half of January is entirely games against playoff teams, but aside from one game against Chicago, the second half of January is entirely games against non-playoff teams (well, and one bubble team in Phoenix). I'm not too worried about the month of January over all, especially if we see Edler and Burrows back from injury.

I've been really impressed by the third line's play lately, but can't help feeling Richardson is a little over his head playing third line centre. Given that the second line's been struggling a bit, do you think we'll see Santorelli moved down to centre the third between Booth and Kassian, and either Hansen or Burrows on the second line wing with Kesler and Higgins? Booth and Kassian seem to really be developing something together, and while Richardson has been okay between them, it'd be exciting to see what a more offensively-minded player can do there.

Avatar
#2 The Benevolent Orca
January 02 2014, 11:46AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
5
props

For me, this is Booth's final year to impress. Like Matt said, he has something going with Kassian. Hopefully that will stick.

Sedin, Sedin, Burrows Kesler, Higgins, Santorelli Booth, Kassian, Richardson

Hansen?

Question is, where does Hansen slot in?

I'm thinking the Canucks are going to be making a trade before the deadline.

Avatar
#3 Ted
January 02 2014, 12:14PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
+1
2
props

I think January will be a bad month for the team. We're a good team but not contenders. We can't generate the offence needed to run with the big boys. Hansen cannot be your top 6 RW. The Sedins are struggling out there from time to time. I actually think Torts might shake up the lines a bit so the O can get rolling. Maybe even start a different unit on the PP.

Avatar
#4 The Voice In The Dark
January 02 2014, 12:31PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
4
props

Kind of glad I skipped this one. Had it recorded on the PVR but decided at 9:30 to just check the score and move on. Looks like I didn't miss too much.

Overall, I've been happy with the Canucks this season. I was cautiously optimistic about the team going into the season, and I still am, but now a bit less cautious and a bit more optimistic.

The Sedins will do what they do, and they will have off games; that's where secondary scoring comes in, and it's been pretty good of late.

The Kesler-Santorelli-Higgins line has been nice to watch, and as two posters above mentioned, Booth and Kassian are starting to show some nice chemistry.

It's also been nice to see Sestito actually contributing, and the fourth line is looking pretty decent. It will be really interesting to see what happens when Burrows (and Schroeder) come back as Torts will have a few more options for line combinations.

Without another center, I don't think they can win, but the roster as is should be able to compete for a round or two against the big guns in the Pacific.

Avatar
#5 wayne berton
January 02 2014, 04:27PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
+1
1
props
The Benevolent Orca wrote:

For me, this is Booth's final year to impress. Like Matt said, he has something going with Kassian. Hopefully that will stick.

Sedin, Sedin, Burrows Kesler, Higgins, Santorelli Booth, Kassian, Richardson

Hansen?

Question is, where does Hansen slot in?

I'm thinking the Canucks are going to be making a trade before the deadline.

Very difficult for the Canucks to make a significant trade. ALL their top players have a No Trade Clause.(another G.M. blunder). Let's hope they don't trade our you prospects for junk. Like what did Roy do for us, costs a 2nd round pick and our best defensive prospect.

Avatar
#6 Matt
January 02 2014, 08:54PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
6
props
wayne berton wrote:

Very difficult for the Canucks to make a significant trade. ALL their top players have a No Trade Clause.(another G.M. blunder). Let's hope they don't trade our you prospects for junk. Like what did Roy do for us, costs a 2nd round pick and our best defensive prospect.

*cough* Corrado *cough*

People are pretty unfair to Derek Roy. He was solid after the trade deadline for Vancouver. Yeah, he disappeared in the playoffs but the playoffs were *four games long*. Lots of good players have four games where they don't accomplish much. Vancouver's series against San Jose didn't turn on Roy's performance - if he'd put up four points in those four games Vancouver still would have lost in the first round.

The Canucks are not going to and should not trade the Sedins, Kesler, or any of the top four D. There are valuable pieces on the team they can move if necessary, and they've got picks and prospects they could move as well. Mid-level prospects are easily replaceable on the market - Yannik Weber brings as much or more to Vancouver than Kevin Connaughton would have, for example.

Avatar
#7 Ryan B
January 02 2014, 10:11PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
+1
3
props

I am going to keep banging the "Kassian with the twins" drum. Kassian has the skill, his size will buy Henrik/Daniel a little more room.

If he's with the twins and that line possesses the puck the majority of the time, does his "lack of defensive abilities" really matter?

When is Schroeder supposed to return?

Avatar
#8 PB
January 03 2014, 06:54AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
2
props

@Matt

Well said. The emergence of other defensive prospects made Connaughton -- who has some skills but has had a hard time sticking on a Dallas defense that is not overly strong -- expendable. I'd do that trade again every time. Didn't cost us a roster player, the second round pick is a decent gamble and Roy was a decent center depth option. I think Connaughton has game but wasn't likely to be playing on the Canucks in the near future, bypassed by better two-way defensemen.

Comments are closed for this article.