CHECK YOUR LID AT THE DOOR

Brian Sutherby
September 20 2013 12:35PM

Last night in New Jersey marked the first time you saw two players in a National Hockey League game circumvent the new rule where a player cannot remove his own helmet prior to a fight. Instead Brett Gallant and Krys Barch politely removed each other’s before throwing punches.

As a guy that didnt find myself in too many fights just for the sake of fighting I did find this gesture a tad foolish. If I was in a fight it was because someone generally did something to me or a teammate that I was fired up about. I wouldn’t have had the patience to wait and not punch my opponent in the chops.

In saying that, these guys are on a completely different level of enforcing and I’m glad I had guys like Krys Barch willing to do the dirtiest work so that I didn’t have to.

With this recent controversy, comes with it all the boo birds saying fighting has no place in hockey anymore or that these one dimensional “goons” shouldn’t be a part of the game.

I for one can tell you that if you saw Krys Barch practice or had the chance to play a shinny game with him, you would think he was a 30 goal scorer in the NHL. His skills are that good. Krys plays a role and knows his role very well but it’s not his toe drag that keeps him in the league. Many of these guys are far better hockey players than given credit for. Anyone that is a teammate of Krys’ or any “enforcer” for that matter is thankful to have these types of guys on their team.

PLAYERS VOTE

Does anyone think it’s strange now a days that you have all these people with a voice on twitter and the internet that say fighting has no place in the game or it should be out of the game, yet 98% of the players want to keep fighting in the game?

We’re not talking 50%; we’re not talking only the 135 players that had more than 1 fight last year per hockeyfights.com.

In 2012 a poll of NHL players found that 98% of players want fighting left in the game.

WHY?

It serves a very important purpose. Along with skill and puck possession and goaltending this is a contact sport that requires character, toughness and guys willing to pay the price to win a hockey game. With that comes a little thing called intimidation.

If there is no one on your team to protect guys or your team doesn’t have a couple guys willing to go get pounded for their teammates, then a skill guy has to worry if so and so is going to be abusing him all night or running him all game and he’s not able to feel as comfortable on the ice. It’s really as simple as that, but many don’t seem to grasp the concept.

There is very much a game with in the game when it comes to fighting and it doesn’t always even mean there is a fight. The mental side of it and the intimidation of knowing that player X is on the bench if I decide to give Crosby a shot here, or the feeling of hey it’s an easy night this guy isn’t dressed I can run around a little more are all factors and head games that just the presence of a tough guy can have.

There are a few that it probably never affects, but most players are lying if they tell you that they are not concerned with who the other team dresses.

Is it always a deterrent? Does it stop all the idiots?

No, but you also can’t see the things it prevents because they didn’t happen.

FIXING THE RULE

Although I didn’t care for the helmet gesture and I imagine you will see something shortly from NHL Head Office about players not being able to undo their chin straps, I hate hearing with each passing rule and year why fighting shouldn’t be a part of the game. The element of fighting has a positive impact on the game whether you get it or not.

We are all big boys and are aware of the physical consequences we risk by playing a game we love.

C76a4c69c9026575581a01d4ac34111c
A Moose Jaw Warriors alumnus and veteran of 460 NHL games with the Capitals, Ducks and Stars—Sutherby is here to regale us with tales of the WJHC, life as an NHL player and much more from a Pro’s perspective. Co-Host's the Jason Gregor show on TSN1260 on Tuesday's from 3-5 and Coaches at www.proconnectionhockey.com Twitter:@briansutherby
Avatar
#1 Romulus' Apotheosis
September 20 2013, 01:02PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Props
32
props

"Does anyone think it’s strange now a days that you have all these people with a voice on twitter and the internet that say fighting has no place in the game or it should be out of the game, yet 98% of the players want to keep fighting in the game?"

Nothing like a few straw men to make your argument look like gold!

First, if I ever wanted to find an example of any group of people holding any view with the intention of raising it to prominence, social media is the gift that keeps on giving.

You can find a group of people committed (actually or for cynical or other purposes) to nearly anything on twitter. Holding those people up as persons we should take seriously isn't going to strengthen your counter-argument.

Second, the vast majority of serious people advancing credible arguments about fighting in hockey have no problem with fighting. They are in complete agreement with those NHL players.

The disagreement isn't about fighting in hockey. That is a complete straw man.

There are two very real disagreements:

1. Is there value in breaking up the game periodically for staged fighting between facepunchers who play a very limited number of games and minutes in those games?

2. Is NHL success more or less likely with such a player on the everyday roster?

This is where the conversation should start.

Avatar
#2 Scary Gary
September 20 2013, 12:55PM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Props
25
props
Tikkanese wrote:

Take that advanced stats' idiots. Fighting belongs and does serve many purposes. Just because you have trouble qualifying it with advance stats' doesn't mean that it doesn't serve a purpose. I'll take an NHL'ers opinion over anyone else's every day of the week. He knows. You don't.

I'm sure advanced stats can be scary if you're not familiar with them but name calling is just as uncalled for as a pre-orchestrated fight.

Avatar
#3 Tikkanese
September 20 2013, 12:51PM
Trash it!
34
trashes
Props
24
props

Take that advanced stats' idiots. Fighting belongs and does serve many purposes. Just because you have trouble qualifying it with advance stats' doesn't mean that it doesn't serve a purpose. I'll take an NHL'ers opinion over anyone else's every day of the week. He knows. You don't.

Avatar
#4 Ducey
September 20 2013, 01:34PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Props
22
props

Is it always a deterrent? Does it stop all the idiots? No, but you also can’t see the things it prevents because they didn’t happen.

My house hasn't been broken into; must be that the garden gnome is preventing it. After all, you can't see the thefts it prevents because they didn't happen.

Avatar
#5 lucasVanDross
September 20 2013, 12:59PM
Trash it!
29
trashes
Props
21
props

Yeah, I'm sure Mike Brown/Darcy Hordichuk playing (poorly) for 4-6 minutes a night made RNH/Eberle feel less intimated by the opponents. It's an outdated concept.

Avatar
#6 Ogden Brother Jr. - Team Strudwick for coach
September 20 2013, 12:50PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
20
props

Great article, I agree 100% with you.

Avatar
#7 coachedpotatoe
September 20 2013, 12:56PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
18
props

As a fan of the game I have no problem with fights that take place as part of the game. Real raw emotions take place after certain events. Matt Stajans' reaction to the hit on Jones was a real reaction situation. What I dislike is the staged fights; as a fan I just change channels. This fight you described would have caused me to do so. Fighting is an element of the game but sometimes it is irrational. I think back to Bert's attack in Vancouver; how was that really related to the moment; it was an assault... not a fight.

As fans we often are critical of the fighters and don't get how much skill some of them might have. Way better skills than most of us would ever have, so thanks for your insights on this. Again I'm in favour of the physical nature of the game but staged fights, revenge fights(assaults) are not needed in this game.

Avatar
#8 Oilers G- Nations Poet Laureate
September 20 2013, 02:14PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
18
props

Drop the gloves and go

Lose the instigator rule

Keeps the game cleaner*

*IF you KNOW you're gonna get your ass handed to you, you aren't gonna take cheap shots...period.

Avatar
#9 thebiggestmanintheworld
September 20 2013, 06:41PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Props
18
props

@Professor Q

Sorry bud.

There are plenty of sports that have all the things you're looking for.

Stop trying to change the one I like, thanks.

Avatar
#10 Derzie
September 20 2013, 12:48PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
16
props

I've always got time for player perspectives. Makes good sense. That said, the instigator rule is puzzling. Disarms the protectors a lot I would think.

Avatar
#13 WILDTHING
September 20 2013, 12:49PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
14
props

Does this mean they got rid of the archaic penalty for starting a fight while wearing a visor?

Avatar
#14 The Last Big Bear
September 20 2013, 01:09PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Props
14
props

Fighting keeps the game cleaner.

Hockey moves too fast for the refs to keep track of everything. But even if the ref doesn't see you get a stick up high on somebody, that guy (or his teammate) can turn around and break your nose if he doesn't like how you're treating him.

That keeps a minimum level of respect between players, this understanding that a guy is within his rights to turn around and kick your *** if you do something cheap.

The only real issue of concern for me is the goons. As long as there is any fighting in hockey, and as long as a heavyweight bout puts fans in the seats, there will be heavyweights fighting in hockey. I don't have an ethical problem with that any more than I have a problem with boxing or MMA. But I would like to see more done to ensure the safety of the guys doing it.

Avatar
#16 Bushed
September 20 2013, 01:45PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
13
props

"...most players are lying if they tell you that they are not concerned with who the other team dresses.

Is it always a deterrent? Does it stop all the idiots?

No, but you also can’t see the things it prevents because they didn’t happen."

^^This.

Yes, it's a game of intimidation. End of discussion.

Great points and great article, Suds.

Avatar
#17 borisnikov
September 20 2013, 02:24PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
13
props

@The Last Big Bear

Fighting keeps the game cleaner

That is a fallacy. Enforcing the rules keeps the game cleaner. Did Matt cook change his ways because of a tough guy threatening him or because the league changed and enforced/enforces the rules?

Avatar
#19 rubbertrout
September 20 2013, 02:17PM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Props
12
props

98% of the best and brightest of the people in the world used to think that the world was flat too.

NHL players are also the ones who for the longest time were the ones that needed to be convinced that putting on a visor is good for protecting their eyes. The fact that some guys still choose to not do this baffles me.

"Because the players want it" isn't enough of a reason to keep it in. Should they have a voice in the matter? Sure. But just because they say they want it doesn't mean that it should be so.

I'm not one of those who says that fighting needs to be completely removed from the game. I don't mind it simply as part of the spectacle from time to time. It may serve a purpose, or at the very least, from the perspective of some of the players and coaches, seem to serve a purpose.

That said, I do not want Brown or Eager playing on my team.

Ever.

Avatar
#21 Tikkanese
September 20 2013, 01:00PM
Trash it!
22
trashes
Props
11
props
Scary Gary wrote:

I'm sure advanced stats can be scary if you're not familiar with them but name calling is just as uncalled for as a pre-orchestrated fight.

So is assuming that I am not familiar with them or trying to belittle my intelligence level by saying "advance stats can be scary".

Avatar
#23 Professor Q
September 20 2013, 05:32PM
Trash it!
42
trashes
Props
10
props

Meh, fighting has no place in the game.

Avatar
#24 Professor Q
September 20 2013, 05:49PM
Trash it!
26
trashes
Props
10
props

And if we all 'policed' ourselves in real-life it'd be perfectly fine too, right? Object of the game of hockey: put the puck in the net more times than the opposing team. That's it. Not 'whoever wins the most fights wins the game.' Arguments using fighting, toughness, emotional response,etc. as a reason for fighting are similar to using a word in the definition of itself and simply perpetuate the old-school, outdated, Neanderthal mindset.

Avatar
#25 rubbertrout
September 20 2013, 02:18PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
9
props
Oilers G- Nations Poet Laureate wrote:

Drop the gloves and go

Lose the instigator rule

Keeps the game cleaner*

*IF you KNOW you're gonna get your ass handed to you, you aren't gonna take cheap shots...period.

Yeah nobody did anything dirty back in the old days.

Hardly.

Avatar
#26 ColourMeImpressed
September 20 2013, 03:54PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
9
props

What pisses me off about the anti-fighting crowd is that when a fight's going on at an arena, everyone is cheering.

Yet somehow the NHL and broadcaster are always talking about how nobody likes fighting.

Avatar
#27 Tikkanese
September 20 2013, 01:40PM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Props
8
props

@Romulus' Apotheosis

"A few straw men"? He did state "twitter and the internet", he did not state just "twitter" which you 100% based your straw men opinion on.

When he stated "and the internet" he is referring to the countless articles and blogs which try to quantify against fighting having any bearing on the game, usually with some cherry picked advance stats, completely ignoring people who play in the NHL's opinion. Which is the only opinion that matters, sorry. I've even read a couple of those articles on this site.

When an NHL player states "The element of fighting has a positive impact on the game whether you get it or not." and when 98% of the NHL voted in favor of fighting, anything said to the contrary is wrong, sorry. That last paragraph is not really directed to you, Romulus, it is directed at those who want fighting out of hockey.

Avatar
#28 Romulus' Apotheosis
September 20 2013, 02:28PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
8
props
Tikkanese wrote:

"A few straw men"? He did state "twitter and the internet", he did not state just "twitter" which you 100% based your straw men opinion on.

When he stated "and the internet" he is referring to the countless articles and blogs which try to quantify against fighting having any bearing on the game, usually with some cherry picked advance stats, completely ignoring people who play in the NHL's opinion. Which is the only opinion that matters, sorry. I've even read a couple of those articles on this site.

When an NHL player states "The element of fighting has a positive impact on the game whether you get it or not." and when 98% of the NHL voted in favor of fighting, anything said to the contrary is wrong, sorry. That last paragraph is not really directed to you, Romulus, it is directed at those who want fighting out of hockey.

I think we are talking past each other, but let me try to be more clear.

First, there are two straw men here, I already explained them. But one more time.

1. when presenting an argument (about anything) it is always best to strengthen your argument by taking up the best counter-arguments available on their own terms.

Pointing to some amorphous group holding a vague series of positions isn't a good way to start.

"all these people with a voice on twitter and the internet" is an incredibly poor starting point for several reasons, not least of which being that (as I mentioned) social media allows for any and all opinions to be expressed (be they genuinely held beliefs or cynical trolling exercises).

On any given topic I can easily find a incredibly weak counter-argument by simply conjuring up a few random jokers "on twitter and the internet."

What that doesn't explain is what these folks' positions are, why they are held, what arguments they use to back them up, whether their opinion is generally held and whether they are in a position of credibility.

2. On articles regarding fighting here at ON, JW has never argued (with stats or otherwise) that fighting shouldn't be in hockey (the position attributed to twitter and the internet).

He and others have tried to analyze the impact of things like hitting, fighting etc on the outcome of games. The same way they would for scoring chances.

This is a completely different conversation. The same way the question of whether soft drinks are good for you is a radically different conversation than whether they should be banned.

Avatar
#29 thebiggestmanintheworld
September 20 2013, 02:47PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
8
props

Better refs would go a long way in cleaning the game up.

With how the game has evolved (bigger, faster, stronger, etc), what changes to officiating have helped improve the quality of the game?

Avatar
#30 Professor Q
September 20 2013, 06:55PM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Props
8
props

@thebiggestmanintheworld

Great response. Extremely thorough and un-biased. I enjoy hockey as well and even played it myself. Why suggest that I am trying to change it? Really? Did I state that I, alone, was physically trying to 'change' hockey? Learn how to understand a point of view and formulate an argument first and then come back.

Avatar
#31 thebiggestmanintheworld
September 20 2013, 08:25PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
8
props

@Professor Q

I doubt I could handle an argument with someone as articulate as yourself.

I mean, I obviously thought that you, alone, were physically trying to change 'hockey'.

You said fighting has no place in hockey. Sure looks like it does to me. Ask the next player, or former pro you see.

If fighting is taken out of hockey, that would be a change, no?

The game is fine, right now, as it is, IMO.

Avatar
#32 Mironovs Nose
September 20 2013, 08:34PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
8
props

I'd just like to reiterate a distinction that other commenters have made because I think that it's very important.

I have heard very few people advocate completely removing fighting from the game and a large number who would like to see goons out of the game.

Did Wendel Clark protect Doug Gilmour? Absolutely. He played on his wing and went after anyone who touched him, and he could go after anyone because he was a 1st line player.

Does Colton Orr protect Nazem Kadri? I don't see how he could from the bench, especially when he's really only going to start something with another goon. Nazem says he feels safer and braver with Orr on the team though so I guess that counts for something.

Avatar
#34 Rama Lama
September 20 2013, 02:04PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Props
7
props

With all things political ( and this is one of them) there is always a silent majority. Then there are the people who scream at the top of their lungs ( the vocal minority) so that the wrold hears them.

Yes fighting is dangerous, so is driving, skydiving, swimming in the ocean, and crossing the street. Pratically all sports are dangerous as well as life in general so let's stop all dangerous activities......and still this would not be enough for the vocal minority.

To me Brian makes an excellent point, that in the heat of the battle, fighting serves a very important purpose. If non-players ( or people that have never played a competitive sport) cannot understand that, then perhaps we need to monitor their " dangerous activities", and regulate their lives to death.

My point is you cannot serve logic to these people, we just need to ignore them, especially the media. Instead we get media covering these idiots and every word they say as the gosple truth.

Avatar
#35 Oilers G- Nations Poet Laureate
September 20 2013, 03:07PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
7
props
rubbertrout wrote:

Yeah nobody did anything dirty back in the old days.

Hardly.

yeah, but then Semenko would deal with your indiscretions

Avatar
#36 Sidney Frosby
September 20 2013, 12:45PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
6
props

This rings true if anyone remembers the Ottawa vs NYR playoff series where Boyle got his face punched in, by Carkner and then Neal, for continually roughing up Karlson after each whistle...

Avatar
#37 ianberg1
September 20 2013, 12:47PM
Trash it!
36
trashes
Props
6
props

An automatic disqualification from the current game for the instigator(s) of a 1st or 2nd period fight and a five minute major for the player(s) who participated in the fight. Same rules if the fight occurs in 3rd period or overtime but the instigator is also disqualified from the team's next game too.

I'm looking for a solution that makes fights less common but doesn't eliminate them entirely nor affects how hockey is otherwise played. Above is what I would do to change the rules FWIW.

Avatar
#38 Frank the dog
September 20 2013, 02:44PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
6
props

Enforcing the rules makes a game cleaner, right? Like in the playoffs?

Avatar
#39 nunyour
September 20 2013, 03:32PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
6
props

There should be no fighting,swearing,or spitting.

Avatar
#40 madjam
September 20 2013, 04:47PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
6
props

Fighting has not been eliminated , but has been transformed into a different form . The big player with little to no hockey skill has basically been eliminated , and that's a positive thing . Intimidation still reigns supreme and physical contact still remains at a high level . Retaliation used to be the penalized one , but now instigation of fight has counter balanced that . Seems rather fitting and a small consulation , I suppose . All sports are taking steps to eliminate as much head shots as possible without disrupting too much of the integrity/physicality of any sport . The less star players are injured , the better for all fans . You still need a deterrent preventing your team members getting run all the time - something we are not overly blessed with as yet .

Avatar
#41 2004Z06
September 20 2013, 08:37PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Props
6
props

Won't be long before the players will be getting "time outs" and "participation ribbons". For the stats guys in the crowd, no more zeros.

This is a much bigger issue than the game of hockey. Society as a whole is very quickly losing accountability and responsibility for it's own actions. Always someone else's fault.

Avatar
#42 Baalzamon
September 20 2013, 09:05PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
6
props

I don't know why anyone takes the testimonials from players as any kind of evidence of anything. The players asked these questions are often asked about a teammate, and that teammate is often well liked; generally a good chap. And even when they don't have this teammate, they're still being asked about a hypothetical teammate who is willing to go to war for them. And one that may be brought in by their team at any moment.

Why would you expect them to say anything but praise? Why would any player go in front of the cameras (or even just a random fan) and say "He's useless. I don't even know why he's on the team."

Exercise some critical thinking please.

Avatar
#44 Giant
September 20 2013, 12:59PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
5
props

Very well said sir. Very well said.

Avatar
#46 backburner
September 20 2013, 04:18PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
5
props

Nobody would ever think of taking hitting out of the game.. yet, what I don't understand is with all the rules created to make the game more safe, and adjustments to equipment (visors), Concussions/ injuries are actually on the rise!?

The physicality of the game is just being redirected. Out of all the times Raffi Torres has been fined or suspended, do you think he's learned his lesson?

I've always thought that fighting was a way of actually protecting one's self and eachother.. If there is a problem, drop the gloves, and deal with it.. In my opinion Goons aren' necessary because they're ARE NOT intimidating anymore.. but if you take out fighting, your are taking away the only thing a guy has to protect or stand up for himself.

Avatar
#47 ubermiguel
September 20 2013, 04:27PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
5
props
Ducey wrote:

Is it always a deterrent? Does it stop all the idiots? No, but you also can’t see the things it prevents because they didn’t happen.

My house hasn't been broken into; must be that the garden gnome is preventing it. After all, you can't see the thefts it prevents because they didn't happen.

Ducey, I want to buy your gnome.

Avatar
#48 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
September 20 2013, 05:20PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Props
5
props

Blessed be the lord (coach), my rock, Who trains my body for war, And my arms for battle. Psalm 144:1

Instead of the epic fail Protect this house, maybe Eakins should have this painted on the hallway walls leading to the ice.

Avatar
#49 Lemming
September 20 2013, 09:51PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Props
5
props

This is why I was opposed to your joining this blog. Fights have been shown to have no outcome on the game, and most fights are when the game has gotten out of hand score-wise.

I don't care that players think fights are awesome. It's why I started reading this blog, because it didn't contain trash "feeling" articles like its, and instead relied on an analysis of numbers to draw conclusions.

Avatar
#50 Oilers need Ogie Ogilthorpe!
September 20 2013, 12:52PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
4
props

Thanks for some 'insider' perspective. So what should MacT and Oilers be doing this season? Should we be looking for that giant without skills? In the past, Smackintyre did little to prevent players like Hemsky from getting destroyed. I'm all for finding a Lucic type who can play and play tough, but we've had no luck in that department.

Many people advocate for letting the refs call the penalties then punishing on the PP, but I always feel like the whistles get put away too often for that strategy to be effective.

I fully agree that the Oil need to get tougher, and that it would probably allow our skill guys - we finally have a bunch of them - to do what they do best. We've just had a parade of guys come through town that couldn't get the job done: Smackintyre (x2), Eager, Brown, Hoedichuck, Fistric.

Comments are closed for this article.