Canucks Re-Sign Andrew Alberts

Dimitri Filipovic
August 22 2013 03:25PM

As the sun rose on this beautiful late-August Thursday in Vancouver, and we enjoyed our morning coffee, we figured that there were still some serious questions surrounding the current state of the the hometown team's back-end. While there were technically 6 defenseman under contract, the prospect of having two of those guys play regular minutes throughout the entire season surely left even the biggest optimist feeling uneasy.

Just a few hours after news broke that Chris Tanev had accepted a 1-year deal (worth $1.5 million), there are reports that the team has decided to bring back hulking veteran defenseman Andrew Alberts (paying him $600k for 1 season). You can now breathe easy and enjoy this glorious weather with your loved ones, guys and gals. 

We'll have some analysis on the deal after the jump.

This move will do nothing to appease the fans that have been vocal about how boring a summer it has been. Nobody is taking their kids to the rink to watch Andrew Alberts play, that much is for sure.

But you know what? I don't mind it one bit. Back in June, we ran a series on this platform in which we laid out the team's biggest needs. One of those was clearly on the third pairing, where they'd have a hole once Free Agency got underway. That's mostly because people just figured that Alberts was gone (I figured this line of thinking was a tad bit premature at the time).

Here's what I wrote in that piece:

"Ideally, for this particular position, you want a player who won't really hurt the team or take too much off of the table. And we know that Alberts can fill that role, at least somewhat effectively even if he's not particualrly good at zone-exits. He's the prototypical stop-gap. If he'd like to sign back on for a year or two at just over a million a season, I wouldn't be throwing my hands up in outrage. Better the devil you know than the devil you don't know, right?"

Alberts certainly has his flaws, but for 600k as a 7th or 8th defenseman that is reliable and can fill in when need be (because injuries will inevitably happen) is a value. He made $1.225 million over the past 2 seasons, so he clearly took a hometown discount of sorts to stay where he was comfortable.

When evaluating this deal, just keep in mind that the Anaheim Ducks recently gave 'Former Vancouver Giants Great' Mark Fistric $900k, and the Montreal Canadiens dished out $1.5 million for Douglas Murray. I like Alberts more than both of those guys in a vacuum, let alone for a cheaper price.

7482b25b962fb1661ea9028fb4e0db36
Dimitri Filipovic writes about hockey on the internet, and is the Managing Editor of Canucks Army. You can follow him on Twitter @DimFilipovic, and email him at dimitri.filipovic@gmail.com.
Avatar
#51 NM00
August 26 2013, 11:19AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

@pheenster

And to what dumb statement are you referring?

As usual, a quote would be appreciated.

As for you...

"For instance, his post above comparing current prospect depth to that of a few years ago. None of us (including him) have any idea how the current crop are going to turn out, and while the full tale hasn't been told on them the status of Schneider, Edler et al is well known to everyone. Comparing the two is nothing but bluster and wild guesswork, leveraged to construct a strawman to further his unhealthy obsession with slagging Mike Gillis."

Which I'm quite sure you know is not what I was doing...

Avatar
#52 5minutesinthebox
August 26 2013, 02:05PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
NM00 wrote:

Then why would Alberts stay on a team where he is probably 7th or 8th on the depth chart?

I assume he'd prefer more money and, quite possibly, a bigger role over a 50% cut in pay.

Maybe because he likes the organization, the city, and doesnt want to move his family? Not too hard to figure out. Do you really think he didnt get any other offers? Please.

Avatar
#53 5minutesinthebox
August 26 2013, 02:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
NM00 wrote:

I'd take Schneider, Edler, Bourdon (RIP), Raymond & Grabner against Jensen, Corrado, Gaunce, Horvat & Shinkaruk.

Especially since the latter list includes an extra first round pick acquired by diluting the major league roster in the Schneider trade.

Easy to be a hind sight psychic

Avatar
#54 NM00
August 26 2013, 02:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@5minutesinthebox

It's not even remotely hindsight (see the exchange with Pheenster).

But nice try!

Comments are closed for this article.