Prospect Profile: #13 Alexandre Mallet

Dimitri Filipovic
August 14 2013 10:21AM


Image via Matthew Henderson

When the Vancouver Canucks selected Alexandre Mallet 57th overall in the 2012 NHL entry draft, nearly everyone simultaneously raised their eyebrows in a show of surprise. After all, this was a player that had been passed over entirely by all 30 teams (including the Canucks) in the previous two drafts. 

It wasn't necessarily an indictment against Mallet - who had just finished off a rather impressive season for the Rimouski Oceanic - but moreso a shared feeling that Mike Gillis and company had needlessly reached for a player that would've surely been available later on in the draft.

At the time, I somewhat half-heartedly defended the decision; if they truly valued him as a prospect, and believed that he was legit, then I had no real issue with them ensuring that he became a member of the organization. Even if it meant reaching. Unfortunately, his play this past season did little to support the idea that he's actually "legit".

Read on past the jump for more on Mallet, his disappointing campaign, and what's next.

Here's Hockey Future's scouting report on Mallet:

Passed over two years in a row for the draft, Mallet never gave up and was rewarded with a second round selection by the Canucks. The same perseverance makes an appearance on the ice, where his no-quit attitude and hard-nosed play has drawn rave reviews from everyone but his on-ice competition. Furthermore, he made the most of a larger role last season and showcased some offensive abilities previously unseen. A hardhat and lunch pail type of player who leaves it all on the ice, his compete level and dedication alone could take him far.

Followed by a breakdown of Mallet's production in the QMJHL, year-by-year (including playoffs):

17-year old season: 11 games, 1 goal, 2 points.

18-year old season: 77 games, 11 goals, 21 points.

19-year old season: 65 games, 10 goals, 21 points.

20-year old season: 89 games, 44 goals, 106 points.

It all makes for a neat story, no doubt, but we can't just look at what Mallet accomplished in his final year in the QMJHL in a vacuum. Context is crucial, as always. Say it with me: one of these things is not like the others. An optimist may say that he figured things out, but the skeptic in me believes that we can attribute the massive spike in production to the fact that he was an overage, 20-year old man that had his way with a bunch of 17 and 18-year olds kids. 

When he fell flat on his face during his 18-game stint for the Chicago Wolves to start the season the skeptic in me felt vindicated. That's not to say that we should just forget about him as a prospect, but if he really had "figured things out", then why did he revert back to being a largely unproductive, 4th-line agitator as soon as he lost the physical advantage he had enjoyed the previous year? I don't think it's a coincidence, unfortunately.

There was some thought that some of the reasoning behind taking him was that he'd be ready to step into an NHL lineup sooner than most of the guys being taken in that vicinity, which would provide the team with a useful asset during the Sedin era. In last year's profile of him (in which he slotted in as our 9th ranked prospect), Jeff Angus pointed out that the team surely coveted his "readiness" and "maturity". Ironically enough, now I see people labelling him as a "project" that will take time to season before we can even really consider the potential of him playing in the NHL.

That change in thinking was probably brought on by just how resounding a flop his AHL stint was - 1 point, and just 1 fight in 18 games. He ultimately had to be sent down to the ECHL to try and salvage his first season as a pro. To his credit, he did manage to score 10 goals and register 29 points in 48 games for the Kalamazoo Wings. Just keep in mind that while those numbers look impressive on the surface, it's the ECHL; a topic we covered in splashing some cold water on Yann Sauve's impressive run there last season.

Nonetheless, here's his highlight pack from last season:

There's no denying that he possesses a tantalizing combination of tools. He's big, he seems willing to do the dirty work, and he has a scoring touch. Not a 40+ goal scoring touch like he displayed in Rimouski, but one nonetheless. Were he to ever be called up to the Canucks, I have no doubts in my mind that he'd instantly become a fan favourite. Just check out his hockeyfights [dot] com page; he totally manhandles dudes on the regular. It's not overly difficult to close your eyes and envision him getting up to stuff all over the ice, causing havoc for the opposition. It's why, despite a disappointing 2012-13 campaign, he was still ranked as our 13th best prospect in the system.

From what I saw of him during the lockout - while he was still up with the Wolves - he seemed to be pressing, and trying to do too much. He certainly isn't the first, and won't be the last player to do so in making the jump to professional hockey. There are adjustments to be made, and some players take longer to make them. I'm sure he was feeling a ton of pressure to justify the team reaching for him in the 2nd round, and if he were to have a bounceback season next year as something of a "post-hype sleeper", I wouldn't be surprised. But just temper your expectations on him for the time being, is all.

One general point of caution: fans seem to enjoy finding comparables for prospects - which every single scout I've ever talked to, or read, has shown a prominent reluctance to do - because they're, well, easy to do, and people tend to be lazy. Obviously as soon as a French-Canadian player named Alex - who happens to play a rugged game while boasting at least some semblance of skill - appeared out of nowhere on his way to becaming a Canuck, it was inevitable that comparisons to Alex Burrows would be made.

If he becomes 1/10th the player Alex Burrows has been, and continues to be, he and the Canucks should consider themselves lucky. While you're looking for the "next Alex Burrows", you may as well try to find the "next Milan Lucic", too.

Other Prospect Profiles in This Series:

7482b25b962fb1661ea9028fb4e0db36
Dimitri Filipovic writes about hockey on the internet, and is the Managing Editor of Canucks Army. You can follow him on Twitter @DimFilipovic, and email him at dimitri.filipovic@gmail.com.
Avatar
#1 BrudnySeaby
August 14 2013, 10:45AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
0
props

"...him getting up to stuff all over the ice, causing havoc for the opposition." seems a bit of a paper thin argument for coming in at 13th overall on this list, no? Unless of course he is a player to Torts' heart's content with all the stuff that he gets up to while being more stiff on the ice!

Avatar
#3 GRR
August 14 2013, 11:27AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
7
props

I wasn't a big fan of the pick. Especially with Damon Severson available. Now he's considered one of the Devils top defense prospects and has a good chance of making Team Canada at the WJC.

The Canucks didn't have a 4th round pick (where Mallet was projectd, I believe), but sure;y it wouldnt have been hard to acquire one if they really wanted him.

It's just an example of Mike Gillis thinking he's smarter than anyone else and then failing miserably.

Avatar
#4 Jeff Angus
August 14 2013, 11:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
4
props

I liked what I saw the few times I caught him last year... but those numbers simply don't lie. Has a ways to go to get on track as a legit NHL prospect.

Avatar
#5 NM00
August 14 2013, 12:04PM
Trash it!
13
trashes
+1
6
props

Among the many dumb things Gillis has done, wasting draft picks on older players may be the dumbest.

Yet another example of Gillis reading Moneyball without understanding its practical use.

A wise man once said "sometimes you can forget about the basics when you’re pursuing something new".

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/sloan-analytics-cuban-mccracken-jedlovic/

Avatar
#6 Dan
August 14 2013, 01:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Anyone aware of what his minutes/role were like in Chicago/Kalamazoo?

Might be interesting to see what kind of role he gets in Utica this season with the Canucks having control of the franchise.

Avatar
#7 Ted
August 14 2013, 01:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props

I think the Canucks are cursed when it comes to drafts. I don't know if there's a team out there that's had as many picks not make the NHL.

Mallet has a lot of potential but I'm not holding my breath. He looked great in the prospects camp but he is a bit older. This is an important season for him. Hopefully he takes the next step.

Avatar
#8 NM00
August 14 2013, 01:35PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
+1
1
props

@Ted

"Mallet has a lot of potential but I'm not holding my breath. He looked great in the prospects camp but he is a bit older. This is an important season for him. Hopefully he takes the next step."

That step needed to happen as soon as he was drafted considering his age.

This is the equivalent of a pitcher drafted out of college that stalls at AA.

Avatar
#9 BrudnySeaby
August 14 2013, 02:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

@ NM00 But some players, just like other people, develop later than others. So who knows!?

And Dimitri, good point about the Canucks prospect pool compared to the other teams.

Avatar
#10 acg5151
August 14 2013, 02:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Mike Gillis probably shouldn't have drafted this guy. I like how now that the Canucks are getting back into drafting guys playing in the CHL the prospect pool is better. Hunter Shinkaruk and Bo Horvat are both impressive prospects, and Brendan Gaunce is, to me anyways, even better. Also liked the Jordan Subban pick - he was a solid choice. I never really liked the idea of drafting 20 year old college players. It seemed like the Canucks were reaching on every pick and it shows - the only prospects of note that have come up over the past few years are really just Cody Hodgson and Jordan Schroeder - and Hodgson didn't even make it a full season before we dumped him. Tanev and Corrado too, I guess.

Ultimately, I think this past draft has turned a prospect pool that IMHO ranked bottom 5 in the league, into a middling pool. I'd say the Canucks are right around #15 in terms of prospect strength right now.

I just wish they would have traded Cory Schneider at a time when he had more value. Canucks could have gotten more than just the #9 pick, but if Bo Horvat turns into a good 1st, 2nd line center I won't complain.

Avatar
#11 Bert
August 14 2013, 02:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

Should have took Jujhar Khaira.

Avatar
#12 NM00
August 14 2013, 02:51PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
4
props
BrudnySeaby wrote:

@ NM00 But some players, just like other people, develop later than others. So who knows!?

And Dimitri, good point about the Canucks prospect pool compared to the other teams.

Yes and I am all in favour of trying to find "late bloomers" such as Tanev via free agency.

However, wasting a 2nd round pick on the next Darren Archibald is poor process that will likely lead to a poor outcome.

Avatar
#13 Mantastic
August 14 2013, 03:00PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
4
props

@Ted

not cursed.. just bad...

Avatar
#14 Ted
August 14 2013, 06:03PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
+1
4
props

@NM00

It's a fact that some players develop later. If he's making progress than so be it.

How many players are drafted in an NHL draft? Out of all of those drafted each year, about 50 become NHL players. The odds are against them right from the start. So, Mallet may not become an NHL regular but you never know. Chances are slim but I'm not giving up especially when he shows signs. Also, power forwards usually take more time to develop.

At the end of the day, I am fine with Mallet not showing signs immediately even if he was an older draft pick.

Avatar
#15 NM00
August 14 2013, 06:59PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
+1
0
props

@Ted

"It's a fact that some players develop later."

Thank you captain obvious.

"If he's making progress than so be it."

What Mallet has done since being drafted is a gross misuse of the word 'progress'.

It was a dumb idea at the time that looks even dumber now with an additional year of data.

Gillis clearly doesn't understand the difference between college players in baseball and overagers in hockey:

http://canucksarmy.com/2013/6/26/lottery-picks-and-mike-gillis-draft-strategy

High school baseball players often go to college to improve their stock, get drafted in a higher spot a couple of years later and make more money.

That isn't even remotely comparable to Mallet being passed over 7 different times by all 30 teams as an 18 year old.

Avatar
#16 NM00
August 14 2013, 11:44PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
+1
0
props

123

Avatar
#17 Ted
August 15 2013, 12:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
8
props

@NM00

Wow, where can I get a crystal ball like yours? You've already figured out the kid's future and chastised him for living. You are the man! The know it all that knows nothing - bad combo :)

Avatar
#18 Scott Hall
August 15 2013, 09:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
6
props

@NM00

Well aren't you just the hockey authority here?! Your mom must be proud.

Avatar
#19 NM00
August 15 2013, 10:36AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
+1
2
props
Ted wrote:

@NM00

Wow, where can I get a crystal ball like yours? You've already figured out the kid's future and chastised him for living. You are the man! The know it all that knows nothing - bad combo :)

You are in dire need of a basic logic class.

You clearly don't understand what a strawman is.

Avatar
#20 NM00
August 15 2013, 10:38AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
+1
0
props

@Scott Hall

Did you think up this quip all by yourself from your mother's basement?

Comments are closed for this article.