Trading Alex Edler: Who to Target (Part III)

Jeff Angus
June 02 2013 10:28AM


Loui Eriksson - Wikimediacommons

In the final installment of the Alex Edler trade series, we take a look at one more forward who the Canucks could target if they do end up shopping the big Swedish defenseman this summer. Here were the previous posts:

A quick refresher on why Edler’s name is mentioned in trade talks:

[Edler’s] name is only surfacing in speculation because he seems to be the only core player with great trade value (and the only one that could be realistically traded). You don’t move players like Edler for the sake of it – he’s a proven top pairing defenseman with a lot of great qualities.

Vancouver probably won’t end up dealing Edler (I'd say the chances of him being moved are somewhere between 20 and 30%). But if they want to make some significant changes to the core (and improvements to the offense), he is easily the most valuable asset they have to work with.

Loui Eriksson – LW/RW Dallas Stars

Why?

DefendingBigD’s Brandon Worley analyzed Loui Eriksson’s future in Dallas in this post.

Eriksson is arguably the best player on the team. An incredible two-way forward with top possession ability as well as elite scoring prowess has Eriksson's name on the list of some of the top forwards in the NHL. His humble demeanor and and off the ice, as well as where he plays, has led to Eriksson becoming known as the most underrated player in the NHL.

No argument there. Eriksson wasn’t his usually consistent self offensively in 2013, but he is one of the best two-way forwards in hockey. From 2009 until 2012, he registered seasons of 71, 73, and 71 points, respectively. And he is a massive salary bargain - $4.25 million per season until 2016. That’s David Booth money! Worley believes the Stars should target a top six center for Eriksson, which doesn’t make Vancouver a good fit. Right now, Jamie Benn and Cody Eakin are the two top centers in Dallas. Eakin is a terrific young forward, but he isn’t second line material just yet.

I don’t see the Canucks moving Ryan Kesler unless the return is ridiculous, and there simply aren’t many good centers available right now. However, the Stars could use a top pairing defenseman. Edler would become their best blueliner, and could probably slide in quite nicely on the left side with Stephane Robidas (which would allow rookie Brenden Dillon and Trevor Daley or Alex Goligoski to play on pairing two). Dallas’ defense was a weakness in 2013, and the team has been after a true top pairing blueliner since Sergei Zubov retired over a decade ago. Dillon's rookie season was very encouraging, but it isn't fair to place that type of pressure on a second-year guy.

Could Edler be that guy?

And for the Canucks, this would allow them to reunite Eriksson with the Sedin twins - the trio recently dominated the World Championships (on the big ice, mind you). Eriksson is essentially a faster Sedin with a bit less passing ability but a better shot - he's smart, loves to play off the cycle, and he's very creative with the puck. It would also allow the Canucks to play Alex Burrows and Ryan Kesler together on line two. Perhaps with rookie Nicklas Jensen? Vancouver needs to find a way to spread out the scoring on three lines, and this move would accomplish exactly that.

Is he available?

Eriksson has been referred to as untouchable by team owner Tom Gaglardi on more than one occasion. I am of the mindset that there are no untouchables in hockey. If the Stars can find a trade that improves them, they have to think about doing it. And with younger wingers Matt Fraser and Alex Chiasson ready for NHL action, perhaps trading from a position of strength to shore up a weakness makes sense?

And while the turnovers and defensive errors from an up-and-down 2013 season are still fresh in the collective memories of Vancouver fans, Edler is still the defenseman who can do this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

Trading a core player is never an easy decision. But great teams aren't built on easy decisions. Do you think Dean Lombardi knew unequivocally that moving Brayden Schenn and Wayne Simmonds for Mike Richards was going to work out? The Jeff Carter trade may seen like a no-brainer, but Lombardi did gamble when moving Jack Johnson that Slava Voynov was ready to step up.

General managers aim to mitigate risk wherever they can, but when things get stagnant, sometimes risk is the only way to take the next step (or avoid the inevitable collapse). The Canucks don’t have a knight in shining armour ready to take over, and their forward group leaves much to be desired as it stands right now. Trading Alex Edler may be the only way to keep the window to win open...

Follow Jeff on Twitter @anguscertified

F2cf6fd9972ec927b678af6dba1e37be
Jeff shares his Canuck-related thoughts with the Army a few times per week. His work can also be found over at DobberHockey.com, as well as his personal blog, AngusCertified.com. Give him a follow on Twitter @anguscertified.
Avatar
#1 Brian
June 02 2013, 10:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Id rather see us trade Edler for some youth and players who can be the core in the future. Loui Eriksson is good, but its more of the same imo, another complimentary player to play with an aging core.

Avatar
#2 Bridget
June 02 2013, 01:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The line with the Sedins could be "Swedish Fish" ... Just cause the line makes me as happy as the candy does. Seriously after seeing them play at IIHF I've wanted this line. Don't see it happening, but a girl can dream right?

Avatar
#3 acg5151
June 02 2013, 01:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Loui Eriksson would be good but the Canucks could probably snag another piece in addition in a trade for Edler - maybe a 3rd or 4th liner like Fiddler or Tom Wandell.

It would be weird to see the Canucks trade Edler but he just isn't getting it done. I would like to see him clean up these defensive mistakes he is so prone to making. I don't know if we can count on it.

Avatar
#4 elvis15
June 02 2013, 05:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Brian

Eriksson is only a complimentary player in the same sense as calling Kesler that. He might not be your top player on the roster, but he's a 1b at worst, just as Kesler could be a solid 1st line center on a number of other teams. If you want to call that complimentary, I'd be happy at the compliment of having them on our team!

Avatar
#5 BrudnySeaby
June 02 2013, 05:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The only player on the Dallas roster I would trade Edler for would be Jaimie Benn. Call me crazy but if we move a future core player, we want one back!

Avatar
#6 Gullzy
June 02 2013, 06:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I'll probably get put on blast for this,but I think we should keep Edler; and move Hamhuis.

Avatar
#7 NM00
June 02 2013, 06:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Does trading Edler for a winger actually make the Canucks better?

A top 4 of Hammer/Bieksa & Garrison/Tanev doesn't exactly inspire a lot of confidence.

It looks more like robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Considering how difficult it is to find #2 defenseman with #1 defenseman upside, a borderline elite winger doesn't seem like enough.

It would make the Canucks different, but not necessarily better. Maybe worse.

Avatar
#8 Lemming
June 02 2013, 10:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I don't like the idea of trading Edler, but Eriksson is one of the few guys I'd be ok with trading him for. He is a legitimate beast, great possession numbers, smart, skilled, would be amazing with the Sedins...

...and I don't see why Dallas would do it, aside from the stagnation reason listed above.

Avatar
#9 canucker
June 03 2013, 07:30AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Brian

Jeff angus needs to put away the crack pipe if he thinks edler will fetch eberle or Ryan etc .... let's be honest, a injury-prone defenceman that cant skate backwards who has a lousy contract won't get much ... elder is a turnstile, either make him a winger or be happy if they can jjettison him for some draft picks ...he's taking away valuable developmen time from conauton et al

Avatar
#10 Mantastic
June 03 2013, 09:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

i really don't understand why people think Edler is a #1 or top pairing D-man. he's not a top pairing in Vancouver, a team that badly needs one and he's a turnstyle. i can't remember the amount of times Edler was been walked around when it's open ice.

i keep remembering Thomas calling the Sedin caddy position the most cushy job in hockey yet Edler is just awful without erhoff

Comments are closed for this article.