Trade Deadline 2013: Five Top-Six Forwards for the Canucks to Target

Patrick Johnston
April 01 2013 01:20PM


Martin Gelinas was a free pickup for Pat Quinn. Mike Gillis probably won't find a similar gem, but one can dream.

Getting a forward. That's all anyone in Vancouver has talked about in the last month. Get another forward. 

Sometimes the mob gets overly agitated for no good reason. In this case, however, they are dead on. The Canucks need a forward, preferably a centre. With Ryan Kesler likely never to be quite the same - how could he be, having undergone two serious surgeries on joints in the last two years - and David Booth apparently done for the season, the Canucks' forward lines are out of whack. 

After the jump, let's have a look at five names out there that might be useful pickups for the Canucks.

There are two players who set standards for the Canucks in the mid-season pickups narratives: Martin Rucinsky and Martin Gelinas. Rucinsky, famously, was picked up at the deadline in 2004 as a desperate replacement for Todd Bertuzzi, in the aftermath of the Steve Moore debacle. He was not at all what the Canucks needed - he had skill but not much interest in going to the net. Gelinas, on the other hand, was brought in by Pat Quinn as a reclamation project. Gelinas was traded for Wayne Gretzky but never found a fit in Edmonton. He'd moved on to Quebec, who cast him aside on waivers. Quinn brought Gelinas to the west coast, where the Quebecer quickly became a fan favourite and emerged as one of the Canucks' most useful two-way forwards in the mid-90s. So we'll evaluate possible top-six forward acquistions according to that scale: The Martin Rucinsky to Martin Gelinas meter. It's all hyper scientific and objective, trust me.

Steve Sullivan - (Cap hit: $2.6 million) PHOENIX COYOTES

Why?

A long, long track record of success. The 38 year old now has 1001 games under his belt and has racked up 742 points in the process. For much of his career, he was a point-per-game player, but in the last four seasons, has settled in as a steady 50-point player, the sort of results you look for from a second line forward.

Why not? 

He's old. He's also mostly a third liner for the Coyotes. He'd probably fit into the Canucks rotation as such, but the Canucks need a checking centre more than another good two-way winger.


Steve Sullivan still has some gas left in the tank. But he's not what the Canucks need.

Ryane Clowe - (Cap hit: $3.625 million) SAN JOSE SHARKS

Why?

Big, good skater, tough, scores goals. Everything you want, right? Don't get confused by his struggles this season - he's still shooting as much as ever (a touch over two per game) - so he's a nice buy low option. Though I doubt Doug Wilson is that silly. Also, he's on an expiring contract and has a previous relationship with headcoach Alain Vigneault. So there's little risk here.

Why not?

He's turning 31. How long can he keep up with his rambunctious style, not get hurt AND remain effective? Again, he's a winger; his style would be a good fit, but he doesn't take faceoffs so he doesn't fill the team's primary need.


He'd change the dynamic of Vancouver's forward group in a good way. Isn't a centre though.

Mike Ribiero - (CAP HIT: $5 MILLION) WASHINGTON CAPITALS

Why?

A top-notch playmaker; he's been maligned for years, but he's always brought the goods. The Canucks desperately need scoring depth and Ribiero's skill set would be a great help. He does an acceptable job in the defensive end - not incredible, but he doesn't get destroyed either.

Why not?

He's got a big cap hit, and what do you do when Ryan Kesler comes back? He's not exactly a prototypical Alain Vigneault third-line centre, though he does bring more offense to the table than anyone in Vancouver's current forward group.


A pure rental who can score. He'd be helpful, but isn't quite an ideal fit.

Steve Ott - (Cap hit: $2.95 million, signed through 2013-14) BUFFALO SABRES

Why?

Truculence, a good defensive reputation; Ott's got that in spades. He plays jerkpuck as if it were second nature to him. His cap hit is decent and to top it off he might fit in as the Manny Malhotra replacement the Canucks have been looking for. He's outstanding on faceoffs and his defensive game is polished. He could pitch in on the wing in the top-six too.

Why not?

Like Malhotra, he's not known for his offensive prowess. He's always a risk to go overboard - would he be able to channel his energy in the way that Max Lapierre did when he first arrived in 2011?


You could do a lot worse than Ott as a top-nine winger and faceoff specialist.

Derek Roy - (Cap hit: $4 million) DALLAS STARS

Why? 

Knows what to do in his own end and drives play down ice. He's been a solid second-line centre for much of the past decade. Intriguingly enough, he was traded for Steve Ott last summer, in a move that was seen by both teams as adding a piece they needed. The move didn't put either team over the top but both players would suit the Canucks.

Why not?

Major shoulder surgery last summer - and arm surgery the year before -  may have seriously altered his abilities. He's small too; despite everything, bigger generally is better. Taking up more space on the ice is an important quality. The Canucks already have one undersized centre, do they really want two?

 


Probably the best Kesler insurance on the market at the deadline.

1f92153409d9b33c123e47094f0ac4b6
Patrick Johnston is a Vancouver journalist. In addition to regular contributions here at Canucks Army, his work has appeared in The Province, Hockey Now and on the CBC. Check out his blog and other writing at http://johnstonwrites.wordpress.com or follow him on twitter: @risingaction
Avatar
#1 elvis15
April 01 2013, 04:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

With Roy reportedly looking for a raise this summer, not sure he'd fit so well. A bit more of a playmaker than we already have for the 2nd line, but not a clear upgrade overall considering what we'd have to pay to get him (and then keep him beyond a rental) over someone like Raymond.

I don't see us doing much. I can see how a few of these players would help, but they aren't going to turn us into a playoff juggernaut. We might be better sticking with what we have, moving some overpriced depth contracts, and moving Luongo for top picks and prospects at the draft.

Avatar
#2 Fred-65
April 01 2013, 05:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Otts your boy. A proven Cup player, knows what it takes and will do any thing to get there. His current reputation if now put in a Canuck uniform might be too much for officials to over look ? 9th in the league with a face off percentage of 57% The Canucks have sure missed Malhotra in the dot and in the room for that matter

I wonder if David Peron would be made available gifted centre with another 3 years at $3.8 per

Avatar
#3 Mack
April 02 2013, 12:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Jason Pominville should rocket to the top of this list with the news today. Would definitely be willing to ante up to get him.

Comments are closed for this article.