Lebrun: "Two Other NHL Teams Have Called On Luongo Over the Past Week"

Thomas Drance
March 29 2013 05:54PM


How many Luongo posts will we write between now and the trade deadline?
Based on our pace the past 24 hours, I'd set the over/under at 20.

Last night we pivotted off of a Damien Cox report which suggested that the Toronto Maple Leafs and Vancouver Canucks had resumed talks concerning a potential deal for Vancouver's deposed starting goaltender Roberto Luongo's. Today that report is being corroborated pretty much everywhere

One of the corroborating reports was filed on Friday afternoon by Pierre Lebrun over at ESPN.com. Lebrun's report is the most detailed and elaborates at length on the sour relationship between General Manager's Mike Gillis and Dave Nonis, while also hinting that there are other a couple of additional clubs that have begun to chase Roberto Luongo just this week.

We'll unpack Lebrun's report in detail after the jump.

Here's the meat of Pierre Lebrun's report, which details how the talks resumed with Laurence Gilman and Cliff Fletcher acting as surrogates for their respective General Managers who don't get along apparently:

Last week in Phoenix when the Canucks were in town there, Vancouver assistant GM Laurence Gilman met with his old pal and mentor Cliff Fletcher, senior adviser with the Leafs. Those two guys talk all the time but, on this occasion, Fletcher re-visted the Luongo dialoge with Gilman.

That conversation between Gilman and Fletcher sparked Vancouver GM Mike Gillis to follow up and phone Toronto GM Dave Nonis this past week to further explore those talks.

This in itself is a story because Gillis and Nonis, I don’t believe, have ever spoken to each other regarding any trade, as some ill-will existed after the former replaced the latter as GM in Vancouver. Usually it’s been other members of each front office communicating on Luongo, not Gillis and Nonis straight on. So that’s perhaps an important shift in this story.

That Mike Gillis and Leafs brass aren't the best of friends - and that Laurence Gilman might need to be the point man on any deal between these two clubs - isn't anything new. Jason Botchford told us as much the day before Brian Burke was fired by Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment. But I find it fascinating that Mike Gillis and Dave Nonis haven't ever spoken to other regarding a trade, not even in the immediate aftermath of Burke's firing...

LeBrun's report continues with the obligatory Miikka Kipprusoff reference and then he drops this tantalizing little bit of scuttlebutt for good measure: "Two other NHL teams have also called on Luongo over the past week. Though how serious that interest is remains difficult to ascertain." Well isn't that delicious. Wonder who the mystery teams are this time! Washington? Philly? 

We could speculate on that endlessly but instead I want to spend a paragraph or two debunking something that seems to be widely believed. I find it very odd indeed that Miikka Kipprusoff keeps being mentioned in rumour reports as if he's a comparable piece who would offer a team like the Maple Leafs much the same thing that a Roberto Luongo would. It's actually preposterous.

Kipprusoff has a .889 even-strength save percentage through sixteen games this season - a very small sample size, of course. He's dealt with injuries and is obviously a way better goaltender than he's shown this season, but in the five seasons prior to the most recent lockout he posted an elite even-strength save percentage two-times (a .928 in both 2011-12 and 2009-10), a passable even-strength save percentage one time (a .919 in 2007-08), and a downright below replacement level even-strength save percentage two times (a .916 in 2010-11 and a .907 in 2008-09). 

Luongo's even-strength save percentage in fifteen games this season isn't particularly good either (.917%) but the last five seasons his results have been uniformly outrageous - here's the numbers from 2011-12 through to 2007-08: .929, .934, .925, .936, .929. So over the past five seasons Miikka Kipprusoff has been an elite goaltender about half the time and swiss cheese the other half of the time. Roberto Luongo on the other hand has been consistently elite. Basically the same player.

LeBrun again indicates that this deal will only get done so long as Vancouver's asking price continues to drop and he's not sure the Canucks will manage to extract that "third line centre" they've been looking for from the Maple Leafs. Yeah, because who would want to trade a prospect and a player on an expiring deal for consistent .929+ goaltending? 

When you consider Luongo's percieved value on the trade market - which appears to be negligible based on the way hockey's most trusted "insiders" talk about him - and contrast it with his absurdly consistent success over the past five seasons, it becomes a lot easier to understand why Mike Gillis has refused to deal him up to this point.

Obviously Luongo trade chatter and speculation is heating up in a big way in the hockey media and that'll probably continue throughout the weekend. But my thinking is beginning to go in the other direction. Everyone seems to think Vancouver's asking price has to keep dropping if they want to consumate a deal and I'm not convinced that Mike Gillis is going to be willing (or should be willing, frankly) to swallow that bitter pill.

And anyway, when was the last time a guy with an "albatross" contract was moved at the trade deadline? Scott Gomez and Brian Campbell? Those guys got moved at the draft.

Read Lebrun's full Report in full here.

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 Andrew
March 29 2013, 06:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Am I the only one who would keep Luongo and his elite numbers, and deal Schneider for the kings ransom he would garner? This team does have a window, and it won't stay open forever. I would be okay with a surprise Schneider trade(and I love Schneids!) because the return for him is much greater, and the difference in performance between he and Luongo is negligible in my mind.

Avatar
#3 van
March 29 2013, 07:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Lightning still make the most sense for me. Coach got fired for bad goaltending. If Yzerman wants to keep his job he'll have to sort it out.

Is Thompson good enough for third line minutes here? Has a very nice contract if so.

Avatar
#4 72minutes
March 29 2013, 07:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@van

Thompson just got his contract extended, though.

I still think Washington is the best fit.

Avatar
#5 Hockey Insiders for MVPoo-poo
March 29 2013, 11:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Hey, how come you didn't include this in the Strombabble series? Awhh.

Anywhoo, the 'Insiders' have proven to know very little regarding Luongo for the last 10 months. McKenzie, LeBrun, Kypreos etc etc spend the entire time leading up to the lockout talking about a 'limited' market for Luongo which included Fla, Tor, Chi and CBJ. The funny thing is, the entire time there were (at minimum) 2 other teams calling (Edm, Philly). So all these 'Insiders' who thought they knew it all, really had no idea.

It's no surprise Luongo trade talks went dead quiet last few weeks cause Toronto hadn't been calling about him. They are the lipservice re: Luongo. They float 'the price is to high', 'we're only willing to pay x and y', 'we're looking at other options'. Ya, what other options exactly. As Drance stated, Kipper isn't exactly replacement level. Not only that, but it's been reported he won't 'report for a trade'. And.... that he's retiring this summer. So Torontos willing to give up a draft pick for a guy who won't report then retires in 3 months. Ya, that sounds like Nonis.

Honestly, I've watched the eastern media rip Luongo, Luongos contract and Gillis for the last 10 months. I've stood quiet long enough. These idiots have tried to devalue him as a person and asset to the point most people actually believe it. I am grateful Gillis knows differently.

Luongo is far more valuable on the team this yr, then traded away for nothing. 1/2 the leagues starting goaltenders have been injured this yr in only 33 games played. What happens if they trade Luongo for nothing and Schneider gets injured or falters in the playoffs? They'd be in trouble. I'd rather see Gillis roll the dice in the offseason than trade him now for nothing. Canucks have a ton of cap space right now, they're not in need of it. They need certainty in net, and something on Luongo can give them.

Poo on Toronto. They don't deserve Luongo.

Sidenote, its gotta be Washington and Philly. I say there's about a 99% chance Philly buys out Bryz this summer. They're done with him - they've been done for some time. And Botch reported Washington joined the party. So that's my guess.

Avatar
#6 kagee
March 30 2013, 04:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Yeah I see a deal happening at the draft 13' especially when another team can take care of one of their own contracts first.

Avatar
#7 KleptoKlown
March 30 2013, 01:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Unless another team is willing to pay that "high price tag" for Lou before the deadline, the Canucks are better off keeping Lou the rest of the year. With Booth and Malholtra off the books, and Ballard's yearly "injury" until the playoffs start, the Canucks have the cap space to add depth players and remain under the cap.

Avatar
#8 m
March 30 2013, 08:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Toronto dosnt want Luongo he chokes in the playoffs and with team Canada

Avatar
#9 Slightly concerned
March 31 2013, 10:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The part that worries me is the window canucks have to be contenders. Sure the core players are good but how long can we keep coming up short before someone is held accountable. AV has done a good job but him and MG don't seem to see the same potential. Although, I'd rather they did nothing then trade for people that end up doing nothing. I still wonder what the heck happened with Malhotra? Dumb move if you ask me.

Comments are closed for this article.