Canucks Army Postgame: Stone Mason

That's Offside!
December 31 2013 12:17AM

Steve Mason makes a first period save on Chris Higgins.

After a close and competitive game in Calgary just over 24 hours ago, the Canucks should have been a tired team on a back-to-back after a night of travel, but the Roxy Flu appeared to be in full effect as it was the Canucks who dominated the well-rested Flyers. Then Steve Mason happened; he stopped 41 of 44 shots through regulation and overtime, and all three Canucks shooters in the shootout and effectively stole a game for Philadelphia.

Yes, Steve Mason stole a game for an NHL hockey team.

The Rundown

The 1st period started poorly, as Ryan Kesler took a tripping penalty on Rex Nicklas Grossmann just 43 seconds into the game. Fortunately, Vancouver's vaunted #POWERKILL was able to hold the Flyers at bay, and from that point forward the Canucks carried the majority of play and out-shot the Flyers 8-4. The best Canucks chance of the period came off the stick of Chris Higgins, as he was denied by a sprawling Steve Mason as he cut across the net and tried to shovel a backhand home.

A particularly scary moment came when Kevin Bieksa was struck in the face with a Flyers clearing attempt. The puck appeared to cut him just below his left eye and on the nose. Bieksa would leave for repairs, but return a short time later. Philadelphia scored with about four and a half minutes remaining in the 1st period, as Michael Raffl made a nice play in the corner and Mark Streit flipped a backhand over Eddie Lack to take a 1-0 lead to the dressing room.

By contrast, Vancouver was dominant in the second period. The 3rd line started early, with David Booth sliding a wrap-around off the post. Then just a few short minutes later, the unthinkable happened:

Somewhat surprisingly, that's Tom Sestito's 3rd goal of the season, tying him with David Clarkson, Martin Havlat, Danny Cleary, and a host of talented offensive defensemen like Duncan Keith, Mike Green and Andrei Markov. That's also more goals than John Scott has in his entire NHL career. Tom Sestito also has a higher career shooting percentage than Steven Stamkos, which should tell you all you need to know about how informative shooting percentages are about talent.

The Canucks didn't sag from there, as they continued to pressure the Flyers and create chances. The Sedins combined for a brilliant shorthanded rush, and Mike Santorelli drew a penalty on a scoring chance of his own not long after. Eventually, Vancouver broke through on some wizardous Sedinery:

I was in the middle of yelling "SHOOT THE PUCK" at my TV, but I should know by now to never doubt the Sedins. Who says Jannik Hansen can't play with the twins anyways? Unfortunately the lead didn't last long as Claude Giroux scored another goal late in a period for the Flyers, evening the score at 2-2 with just 1:08 left in the 2nd on a goal that Eddie Lack may have wanted back.

The 3rd period was much the same, as the Canucks continued to out-attempt the Flyers by nearly a 2-to-1 margin. Daniel, Henrik, Ryan Kesler and David Booth all had glorious chances, but Steve Mason just kept standing on his head. He was only beaten on an innocent-looking play when (f)Luke Schenn directed a puck into his own net:

From there, it looked like the Canucks had the game in hand but the Flyers once again would mount some pressure at the end of the period and would once again beat Eddie Lack. After a scrambled face-off, the puck was tapped in front to Brayden Schenn, who simply had to tap the puck in to the gaping net. The goal came against Ryan Kesler's line, as did all the others on the night. It wasn't a banner night for the Canucks second unit.

Vancouver continued generating chances in overtime as John Tortorella rolled a 3-forward formation for the latter half of OT and 4 forwards for the final minute in an attempt to finish the game early. Ryan Kesler had two chances from the high slot, but shot the puck straight at Steve Mason on both occasions. Unfortunately, it was not to be. The Canucks couldn't score in OT and it was the same old story in the shootout. Shootouts are just the best.

Vincent Lecavalier scored on a nice move to beat the Canucks 1-0 in the shootout, making the final score 4-3 for the visitors.

The Numbers

 Courtesy ExtraSkater.com

That's a pretty dominating performance right there. Vancouver out-Fenwick'd the Flyers 55-34 overall, and 36-25 at 5-on-5. In score close situations? 29-18 Vancouver. The Sedins had a really good night as Henrik and Hansen carried a 12-5 Corsi line, but perhaps the best line for the majority of the game was the 3rd line of David Booth, Brad Richardson and Zack Kassian. Richardson and Kassian topped 20 Corsi events each, and Booth carried a 70.4% Corsi For%. The play of the 3rd line of late is really encouraging, and great news for the Canucks if the trio is for real.

On the other side of the spectrum, Claude Giroux, Michael Raffl and Jakub Voracek absolutely kicked Ryan Kesler and co.'s teeth in. Here's the damage:

Ouch. Chris Tanev was also at 40% Corsi For%, but every other Canuck was in the black.

The Conclusion

You win some, you lose some. The Canucks just went 3-1-1 in 5 games when they scored 2 or fewer goals in regulation and OT, so they were due for some kind of regression soon. Tonight it was in goal, but that probably wasn't unexpected given that Eddie Lack was starting for the second time in two nights.

The next game is on Wednesday as Vancouver plays host to the Steve Stamkos-less but still high-flying Tampa Bay Lightning. The Bolts have been very good this year, so it should be a fun game. We'll see you then.

10df053f41f4bdaf4d65eca6e982e46d
Rhys Jessop - CanucksArmy's resident CHL buff/hater of prospects, depending on who you ask. Follow my ramblings on Twitter: @Thats_Offside. Email contact: thats.offside.hockey@gmail.com
Avatar
#1 Matt
December 31 2013, 12:14AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
8
props

"Tom Sestito also has a higher career shooting percentage than Steven Stamkos, which should tell you all you need to know about how informative shooting percentages are about talent."

Maybe if Tom Sestito played 20 minutes a night instead of 5, he'd score 50 goals in a season!

Seriously though, Claude Giroux is really good at hockey. Really really good.

Avatar
#2 tesujiboy
December 31 2013, 12:17AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
4
props

My only comment is that Kesler has to bury one of the two OT chances he had. Mason was great in that Kes managed to hit him in the chest from 15 feet out in the slot twice in less than two minutes.

Avatar
#3 Cam Charron
December 31 2013, 12:28AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
8
props

"The Canucks just went 3-1-1 in 5 games when they scored 2 or fewer goals in regulation and OT"

Wait, what?

Avatar
#5 Brent
December 31 2013, 02:06AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
5
props

ugg! SHould have, would have, could have! Stupid Fenwick! Didn't realize the Kesler line had so much trouble. The tying goal was inexcusable. But it should have never come to that. Torts should have not let them on in the last minute.

So Corrado didn't get much ice time, but he had a positive corsi. But what was up with Tanev?

Avatar
#6 I miss....
December 31 2013, 02:23AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props

...... the # of scoring chances per game (for each team)..... all laid out nicely in a Canucks Army table. Where art though scoring chances?

Avatar
#7 JCDavies
December 31 2013, 02:47AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
5
props

Hamhuis topped 32 minutes tonight. Are all the extra PP minutes (6:10 tonight) really necessary?

Avatar
#8 argoleas
December 31 2013, 03:25AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props

Seriously, if I have to watch the power play one more time, I will shot myself with one of these blanks they keep firing. It will be just as effective. At what point will the team realize that what they are trying is not working? It's like AV is back behind the bench: If it dont work, keep trying it in the exact same way.

Avatar
#9 Ryan B
December 31 2013, 04:14AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
2
props
JCDavies wrote:

Hamhuis topped 32 minutes tonight. Are all the extra PP minutes (6:10 tonight) really necessary?

This. No, Hammer should definitely not be on the PP if he's going to be 22+ minutes ES/PK.

Championship teams don't blow leads, the Canucks are still a bit of a work in progress in that regards.

Avatar
#10 EGS
December 31 2013, 07:30AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
8
props

@Ryan B

"Championship teams don't blow leads"

Chicago was up 2-0 just the other night...'nucks stole that game. Just saying...

Avatar
#11 Ted
December 31 2013, 02:13PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
4
props

Canucks get a ton of chances but can't finish. There were a few great chances...pucks laying there in front of an open net, breakaways, Booth getting robbed...

Unfortunately, it's the same old story. They do everything buy score (well, you know what I mean...). They play a solid system and there's tons of offence just no finish. I'm thinking they start finishing those chances sooner rather than later.

I wonder if having Santo centre Booth and Kassian would improve their offence (when Burr gets back).

Anyway, January is a killer month so we'll see if the Canucks can contend.

Avatar
#12 Marsh
December 31 2013, 02:49PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props

Poor coverage on the far side of the net = 2 goals against. Hamhuis couldn't decide whether to play the Flyer in front of Lack or the guy open by the far post. He chose wrong. Tying 3-3 goal was a shambles from the faceoff but Garrison chose to block the pass across(fail)and Higgins couldn't get back to cover Schenn in time. Lack probably could have stopped a shot by the passer each time had the far post Flyer been covered. Still, bang-bang plays -it's unfair to be too critical.

Avatar
#13 Marsh
December 31 2013, 02:50PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
1
props
Brent wrote:

ugg! SHould have, would have, could have! Stupid Fenwick! Didn't realize the Kesler line had so much trouble. The tying goal was inexcusable. But it should have never come to that. Torts should have not let them on in the last minute.

So Corrado didn't get much ice time, but he had a positive corsi. But what was up with Tanev?

Tanev playing left side last night?

Avatar
#14 Marsh
December 31 2013, 02:57PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
2
props
Ted wrote:

Canucks get a ton of chances but can't finish. There were a few great chances...pucks laying there in front of an open net, breakaways, Booth getting robbed...

Unfortunately, it's the same old story. They do everything buy score (well, you know what I mean...). They play a solid system and there's tons of offence just no finish. I'm thinking they start finishing those chances sooner rather than later.

I wonder if having Santo centre Booth and Kassian would improve their offence (when Burr gets back).

Anyway, January is a killer month so we'll see if the Canucks can contend.

Booth sure goes wide with the puck deep into the offensive zone = sharp angle, low percentage shot. Perhaps he needs a better playmaker so he doesn't need to carry the puck as much. He doesn't mind going in front of the net, unlike Raymond.

Avatar
#15 Ted
December 31 2013, 03:53PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props
Marsh wrote:

Booth sure goes wide with the puck deep into the offensive zone = sharp angle, low percentage shot. Perhaps he needs a better playmaker so he doesn't need to carry the puck as much. He doesn't mind going in front of the net, unlike Raymond.

Yeah and I am liking his game right now. Maybe he needs more ice time?

The specific play I meant was the one where Booth drove to the net and Kassian made a nice pass to put the puck on his stick. A great save on what looked to be a sure goal.

Maybe Torts should give another unit a crack on the PP as well. The 'best' players aren't getting it done and that's been the case for a while now.

Avatar
#16 pheenster
December 31 2013, 05:23PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
0
props
EGS wrote:

"Championship teams don't blow leads"

Chicago was up 2-0 just the other night...'nucks stole that game. Just saying...

Yeah, but the Canucks have blown late leads at least four times already this year (probably more; Philadelphia, Chicago, San Jose and LA and that's just off the top of my head).

You need to win 16 games in the spring to be called a champion. At least 10 (more likely 12-13) of those will be one-goal games. For all the improvement we have seen under the Tortorella regime, the Canucks need to learn how to stop coughing up hairballs in the dying minutes or NM00 will be right (and nobody wants that).

Fortunately, they have half a season to figure this out. I have confidence that they will.

Avatar
#17 Ryan B
December 31 2013, 07:25PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
1
props
pheenster wrote:

Yeah, but the Canucks have blown late leads at least four times already this year (probably more; Philadelphia, Chicago, San Jose and LA and that's just off the top of my head).

You need to win 16 games in the spring to be called a champion. At least 10 (more likely 12-13) of those will be one-goal games. For all the improvement we have seen under the Tortorella regime, the Canucks need to learn how to stop coughing up hairballs in the dying minutes or NM00 will be right (and nobody wants that).

Fortunately, they have half a season to figure this out. I have confidence that they will.

And how many times have the boys blown a third period lead and gifted the opponent a Bettman point by letting the game go to OT/SO?

Always be closing.

Avatar
#18 pheenster
January 01 2014, 02:22AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
0
props
Ryan B wrote:

And how many times have the boys blown a third period lead and gifted the opponent a Bettman point by letting the game go to OT/SO?

Always be closing.

Uh, yeah. That was my point. If I wasn't clear, by "done that" I meant blow late leads.

Comments are closed for this article.