Evening Headshots: November 6th

Mitch D
November 06 2013 09:57PM


Torts is yelling because his team lost. He's also taking the blame for it. A Canucks coach can do that?

Evening, folks. It's that time again, where we all gather 'round the internet campfire and go over the day's news for the Canucks. We have a little of this, a little of that and most of all, we see how many people can call me a knuckle-dragging sheep-fucker. It's time for the evening headshots.

"John Tortorella looked like a New York City traffic cop on Wednesday. Standing at centre ice while waiving his hands..." No, Torts wasn't having a jammer and calling for the medical staff to help him, he was giving the power play some new practice options, according to Ben Kuzma. [The Province]

Jason Botchford has the Canucks Hat Trick; discussing the potential of another trade with Florida. I'll give you a hint, it doesn't rhyme with trading David Booth back to Florida for the cost of the flight. Come to think of it, nothing rhymes with it. If you can think of something that does, you'll get a cookie.

This handsome motherfucker talked about David Booth being sent down to Utica. Lets be real here, it's a shameless plug and essentially everything you already know about SPF7 and his struggles to stay healthy long enough to stay in the lineup. So just go a head and have a look. [NWSports Beat]

Nicklas Jensen can't have a good preseason, stay healthy or record a point in three games with the Utica Comets, but goddamn can he draw. And of course by draw you have to assume this is as good as it gets for a hockey player, or any athlete. [Pass it to Bulis]

Over at...uh, at...Oh, fuck it. It was a slow news day. This is as good as it gets after a loss to the Coyotes. Pretend like I put in a chart or used a series of back and forward slashes to make the Canucks logo. Hopefully after tomorrow's game we'll have a lot to talk about that isn't Joe Thornton living up to his promise of what would happen if he scored four goals.

Thanks for reading. 

5edab28a3ba67350a7373e92630297b7
I'm Mitch, I live in Port Coquitlam and it's not as shitty as you think. On occasion I write, usually some stuff about hockey with more swearing than you'll need. Follow me on twitter! @mitchemdee
Avatar
#1 Matt
November 06 2013, 10:43PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
5
props

You don't need to start every post with a comment about how all the readers hate you.

Avatar
#2 Matt
November 06 2013, 10:45PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
3
props

Also, we can't swear. How come you get to do it so much?

Avatar
#4 The Voice In The Dark
November 06 2013, 11:35PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Props
9
props
Mitch D wrote:

Hmm, not sure. Be creative, find a way around swearing.

Or perhaps the blog writers could find a way to communicate without being such vulgar twats.

Avatar
#6 Slim Dusty
November 07 2013, 02:33AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
4
props

Mitch sucks.

Avatar
#7 Slim Dusty
November 07 2013, 02:36AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
5
props

Your blog is transforming into Nucks Misconduct a little more with each passing second you employ him. If you knew what was good for you, you`d cut him loose.

Avatar
#8 Spikey
November 07 2013, 02:59AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props

seems like Mitch D's blog numbers are good but he is being hated on by Canucks fans.

Avatar
#9 acg5151
November 07 2013, 03:05AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
5
props

Quit hating on Mitch, seriously, he's like a spice added to a bland, statistics and analytical filled dish.

It's a nice change.

Avatar
#10 markusnaslund19
November 07 2013, 03:40AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
4
props

What the hell is happening to this site?

Avatar
#11 PB
November 07 2013, 04:51AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
4
props

Maybe a few more links a few less puffed out chest bits about hardcore you? I don't really care about the swearing, though it does seem a bit of trying to hard...

Avatar
#12 jrozcan
November 07 2013, 05:16AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
3
props

No need for all the swearing Mitch, none of the other writers swear, its just classless and unnecessary.

Avatar
#13 Ted
November 07 2013, 09:27AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
2
props

Ah yes. The old vulgarity in article route. Unfortunate that it has come down to this but it is here. I think the only time that type of language should be used is when addressing Idiot00 and Surrey Rob (who, thankfully, seems to be 'gone').

Avatar
#14 Austin Wallace
November 07 2013, 02:05PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

I do believe Surrey was banned.

Avatar
#15 Ruprecht
November 08 2013, 10:56PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props
Austin Wallace wrote:

I do believe Surrey was banned.

When a heart breaks over the internet does anybody hear the sound? Now, I mourn.

Comments are closed for this article.