Jim Vandermeer Clears Waivers, Jordan Schroeder Finally gets a Shot

Thomas Drance
January 22 2013 11:41AM


Photo Credit: Dale MacMillan/Getty Images

According to Canucks.nhl.com, who would know, the Canucks have recalled Jordan Schroeder from the Chicago Wolves, and I'd expect (though nothing is official yet) that the 2009 first round pick will make his long-awaited NHL debut against Calgary on Wednesday night. The team also re-assigned Jim Vandermeer to Chicago following his clearing waivers earlier Tuesday morning.

These moves don't come as much of a surprise. Many felt that Jordan Schroeder should've made the team out of "training camp," and he only narrowly missed the cut. The Canucks tellingly kept Schroeder in Vancouver about twelve hours longer than they kept Schroeder's Wolves teammates, and the diminutive offensive centerman didn't dress in the Wolves most recent game on Saturday night against the Houston Aeros.

Combine all of that with the fact that Andrew Ebbett has been, well, not a second line center by any definition in Vancouver's first two games this season, and a Schroeder call up was all but inevitable.

Read on past the jump.

If we look over the transcript of Cam Cole's explosive interview with Mike Gillis from Monday afternoon, we can find this tidbit that hints at what role we can expect Jordan Schroeder to fill with the team:

I think you’re going to see (2009 first-rounder Jordan) Schroeder in our lineup, a highly skilled player who will help our power play.

The second unit power-play had some nice moments in Vancouver's Sunday shootout loss to the Edmonton Oilers, but failed to capitalize. With guys like Alex Burrows and Chris Higgins - useful forwards who have never been particularly productive on the man-advantage - on the second unit, the blast of speed and skill that Schroeder can bring to the table should be a welcome relief.

It's also possible that Schroeder's presence, depending on how Alain Vigneault decides to use the rookie, could help the Canucks fatten up their forward lineup and avoid some of the matchup issues they've dealt with in Kesler's absence over the past couple of games. If the Canucks were to, say, skate Kassian with the twins, Burrows and Raymond with Schroeder and keep their "perfect" third line intact - that would give the club a reasonable facsimilie of a top-9 forward group.

Of course that assumes that Schroeder can hack it at the NHL level. He hasn't been the most productive AHL forward during his professional career thus far, though his team's haven't exactly been productive offensively over the past couple of seasons either. Anyway, considering that Ebbett has recieved fourth-liner ice-time in Vancouver's two games so far this season, there's really no risk in finding out.

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 BrudnySeaby
January 22 2013, 11:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Finally! What I don't understand though is why they didn't call him up yesterday, the minute they send down Vandermeer. That way, he could have flown out here yesterday and he would have been able to practice with the team already today. Unless he never left town!?

Avatar
#3 khlhfs
January 22 2013, 12:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Schroeder is a draft bust and it's time for Canucks fans to face it. At 22 his best AHL season has him in the mid 40 point range and frankly, that's just not good enough. You can cut all of the excuses you want for him (he plays for a defensive team) but the bottom line is that good players find a way to produce. Basically, he's too small to play a bottom six role and not offensively talented enough to play a top six one. Time to move on.

Avatar
#4 BrudnySeaby
January 22 2013, 12:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Yes, right, the 23 man roster limit! Thanks, forgot about that for a minute.

Farhan Lalji tweeted this just now: Schroeder on the ice, skating between Raymond & Weise. Kassian with Sedins. Burrows centering 3rd line.

So, did he really leave town? Or did they bring him out here already yesterday, regardless of the (Vandermeer) having to clear waivers (before Schroeder can be called up) part of the rules!?

Hmmm... the plot thickens!? ;-)

Of course that is how I would have done it. Send one guy down and call up the other right away. Especially in a case of Vandermeer. Doesn't matter if he clears or is picked up; you want the other guy here the minute the former clears.

Avatar
#5 DCR
January 22 2013, 12:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
khlhfs wrote:

Schroeder is a draft bust and it's time for Canucks fans to face it. At 22 his best AHL season has him in the mid 40 point range and frankly, that's just not good enough. You can cut all of the excuses you want for him (he plays for a defensive team) but the bottom line is that good players find a way to produce. Basically, he's too small to play a bottom six role and not offensively talented enough to play a top six one. Time to move on.

Am I the only one to think that at 22 and never having played a single NHL game he's still in prospect mode?

He might be a bust, he might be a brilliant success: we don't know, and we can't know until he's actually played at the NHL level. Let's give him a game before we start looking for a bus to throw him under.

Avatar
#6 BrudnySeaby
January 22 2013, 12:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@khlhfs

Dude, give the kid a chance!? Besides, some players develop differently and he might be more successful at the NHL level with better players around him or in a faster paced game. Let's just wait and see. But foremost, give him a chance!!

Avatar
#7 khlhfs
January 22 2013, 01:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@ BrudnySeaby

He'll get his chance obviously. You just shouldn't expect much. The truth is that when it comes to prospect development there's a linear line of logic that applies to 99% of all prospects across all sports. That is, they need to prove they are too good for one league to move up to the next. Based on his number's he hasn't even proven he's an above average point producer for the wolves. How can anyone reasonably assert that his production will be just as good at a higher level?

Avatar
#8 khlhfs
January 22 2013, 01:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

You'll notice that even on a so called math site like this one they haven't posted Schroeder's NHLE? I wonder why that is. *sarcasm*

Avatar
#10 Unknown Comic
January 22 2013, 02:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
khlhfs wrote:

@ BrudnySeaby

He'll get his chance obviously. You just shouldn't expect much. The truth is that when it comes to prospect development there's a linear line of logic that applies to 99% of all prospects across all sports. That is, they need to prove they are too good for one league to move up to the next. Based on his number's he hasn't even proven he's an above average point producer for the wolves. How can anyone reasonably assert that his production will be just as good at a higher level?

Boy, you're using lots of big words and "number's" (sic) here to teach us all a valuable lesson. But as you said, this is a so called math site, so please show us your work or link us to this 99% theory.

Avatar
#11 Jesse
January 22 2013, 02:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@khlhfs

Case A: Nicklas Jensen

Proved to be a reasonable, but not outstanding scorer in Juniors, moves up to the pro level, performs lights out playing against men.

There's all sorts of exception to player development. Every prospect develops different. With Jensen, he was rated as a low 1st rounder/high second rounder based on his CHL resume, but if you base his performance in the pro leagues, he'd be a top first rounder for sure.

Not to mention, look at Cody Hodgson. Schroeder's been tracking better that Hodgson at the same points in their careers and Hodgson looks like he's doing good in Buffalo.

Comments are closed for this article.