The Canucks Elect to Take Mason Raymond to Arbitration

Thomas Drance
June 13 2012 04:29PM

We've been wondering what would happen with Mason Raymond's qualifying offer for months now, and thanks to Darren Dreger's afternoon scoop, now we know.

Mason Raymond's status was particularly interesting heading into this offseason. He's a quasi-core piece and one the Canucks have been very high on (despite his relative lack of production the past two seasons) because he "drives play" and has consistently posted spectacular underlying numbers. Of course that changed this season, as Raymond's performance fell off significantly - probably because it can take a long time to physically and mentally recover from breaking vertebrae in your back. 

Read past the jump for more.

I'm not quite sure where the word "cutdown" comes from in Dreger's tweet, but the relevant legaleese can be found in the CBA under section 12.3 (a)(i) and 12.3 (a)(ii). Here's the relevant language from section 12.3(a)(i):

If a Player who is otherwise eligible to receive a Qualifying Offer and become a Group 2 Restricted Free Agent had a Paragraph 1 NHL Salary plus Signing, Roster and Reporting Bonuses in excess of $1,500,000 in aggregate in the final League Year of his most recent SPC, a Club may elect to file for salary arbitration to determine the Player's Paragraph 1 Salary for the upcoming League Year in lieu of making a Qualifying Offer to such Player.

And section 12.3 (a)(ii):

In any salary arbitration that takes place pursuant to this section 12.3(a), the Salary Arbitrator may not award the Player a Paragraph 1 Salary that is less than eight-five (85) percent of the aggregate sum of Player's Paragraph 1 Salary plus Signing, Reporting and Roster Bonuses in the final League Year of his most recent SPC.

A big thank you to our pal BeanTown for helping us navigate this stuff, and to Capgeek.com for providing a downloadable copy of the CBA.

It's not like the Canucks are using some new fangled type of "Gilman CBA dark magic" in this case. They're simply exercising their right to push a would be "Group 2 Restricted Free Agent" to arbitration, rather than granting him a qualifying offer. This allows the team to contest the value of Mason Raymond's salary next season. This way they're not just being stuck with a 2.6 million dollar cap-hit, which, is the figure Raymond would have been entitled to had he been qualified. 

It's a smart move by the Canucks, and I'd wager that the gambit will succeed at reducing Raymond's base salary. After all, Mason Raymond's agent JP Barry will be unable to present any of the advanced statistical data that paints a flattering picture of the speedy, gravity challenged winger's value. The minimum that Raymond will be paid next year is 2.21 (as per Dreger's tweet) but the arbitrator can decide on a figure higher than that. As we mentioned above, however, Raymond and Barry don't have a lot of leverage in this situation.

There are two possible complications we should quickly go over. The first is that the team will be unable to walk away from any decision granted by the arbitrator (since the arbitration hearing will be a "team elected" one). So, it's possible albeit unlikely, that the team won't ultimately benefit from this maneuver in the slightest. The other thing to note is that the Canucks can only take two of their players to arbitration in a given year. Given that we expect them to protect Cory Schneider in this manner on July fifth (assuming he hasn't been signed to an Offer Sheet before then), it's likely that the Canucks' arbitration dance card will be fully used up as a result of this decision.

So Mason Raymond is going to be back next year (barring a trade, which, seems unlikely) even though the Canucks are going to try and reduce his cap-hit. While Raymond struggled through much of last season - after this kick in the posterior, and with a full summer to train and heal, it's certainly possible he'll re-find his 2009-10, 2010-11 form next season. It's a gamble, but on a short term deal, potentially worth only 2.2 million per season against the cap, it's a gamble the team can afford (especially after what Chris Kelly and David Jones signed for), and one they've taken steps to make even more manageable. 

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 JA
June 13 2012, 05:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Thanks for the quick analysis! I for one glad if he's coming back, still a good deal, potential for a far better season.

Avatar
#2 matt
June 13 2012, 05:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

are there any underlying numbers regarding his fall down like bambi on ice rate (FDLBOIR)? thanks in advance.

Avatar
#3 Cam Charron
June 13 2012, 05:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Is the team allowed to trade him as a Group 2 RFA? The CBA sections you've highlighted doesn't quite make that clear.

Avatar
#4 immie_8
June 13 2012, 05:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I think this is a good move by the Canucks. Even the two risks that you listed aren't really that much of a concern, IMO. Raymond can still be traded before or after abritration and I don't really see the team needing to worry about taking anyone other than Schneider to abritration.

Avatar
#5 Mantastic
June 13 2012, 05:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Mason should be pissed that the team is filing to cutdown his salary. the team would have to provide data during the hearing saying that he's not worth the money and all his agent would have to say is he was recovering from an injury. definitely can cause some bad blood there.

Avatar
#6 Concern
June 13 2012, 10:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Given the Canucks 'image issues' which have developed over the last yr, can't imagine this situation will help. An arb. over $.400K??? That's pennies to the team, especially since they've kept a $4.2M d0man (Keith Ballard) who plays bottom 6 minutes.

Squire on Global News stated he heard Raymond wants to go elsewhere, perhaps to Winnipeg. He mentioned it several times 'Raymond wants to go elsewhere'.

So let's quantify. In the last yr:

Canucks went from 'top 2 team most player want to play on', to 'not even cracking the top 7' a year later. Along the way, they show up in every players poll in a negative fashion (Lappy, Kesler, Luongo and team). Gillis can't attract anyone but Marco Sturm and 4th liners last summer. Then suddenly, there's rumors Hodgson requested a trade, Raymond wants out, Luongo wants out and Ehrhoff darted the second his contract expired.

Now, Ehrhoff we can understand - he'd only been with the team 2 yrs. But Hodgy and Raymond were drafted by this org., and grew up with the Canucks core (in a professional sense). Luongo has also been with this team a long time. So what gives? What's going on with this team? Is it normal- and we just don't hear about it from other teams? Or should be be concerned? Personally, I'm concerned.

Avatar
#7 Mark
June 14 2012, 11:48AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Concern wrote:

Given the Canucks 'image issues' which have developed over the last yr, can't imagine this situation will help. An arb. over $.400K??? That's pennies to the team, especially since they've kept a $4.2M d0man (Keith Ballard) who plays bottom 6 minutes.

Squire on Global News stated he heard Raymond wants to go elsewhere, perhaps to Winnipeg. He mentioned it several times 'Raymond wants to go elsewhere'.

So let's quantify. In the last yr:

Canucks went from 'top 2 team most player want to play on', to 'not even cracking the top 7' a year later. Along the way, they show up in every players poll in a negative fashion (Lappy, Kesler, Luongo and team). Gillis can't attract anyone but Marco Sturm and 4th liners last summer. Then suddenly, there's rumors Hodgson requested a trade, Raymond wants out, Luongo wants out and Ehrhoff darted the second his contract expired.

Now, Ehrhoff we can understand - he'd only been with the team 2 yrs. But Hodgy and Raymond were drafted by this org., and grew up with the Canucks core (in a professional sense). Luongo has also been with this team a long time. So what gives? What's going on with this team? Is it normal- and we just don't hear about it from other teams? Or should be be concerned? Personally, I'm concerned.

Hodgson wanted a trade because he wasn't getting a sniff at top 6 minutes with Kesler and Hank. Luo wants to go because Cory Schneider is a beast. Ehrhoff left because he wanted money above all else. Why else would he go to Buffalo? To win? Please

Avatar
#8 puck-bandit
June 14 2012, 09:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

It's bad enough we got bounced in the 1st. round, but what has become somewhat taxing is the name of Cody Hodgson, or whatever his name is. I; hands down believe what Mike said about him, he wanted a trade, and he got one. Players come and go, that is the business of hockey. I would like nothing more than to sit with MG and Lawrence and tell them how to run the team, but unfortunately I just get to sit in the stands and cheer the guy's on, no matter the outcome. It also surprises me how many fans are either disappointed, reference to salary cut, or supportive of Mason Raymond still being a member of the Nuck's. I think with most of us player passion gets in the way of common sense. We are fighting a clock that is running out of time, and for the money Raymond is getting we can pick up a far Superior player. I say this respectfully, but don't you think we deserve a parade?

Comments are closed for this article.