Is Jordan Schroeder Ready to Fill in for Kesler?

Thomas Drance
May 10 2012 12:33PM


This picture marks the only time in recorded history that Mike Gillis has appeared droll.

Following the Cody Hodgson trade this past February, and the recent news that Ryan Kesler went under the knife again this week (and will need "four to six months" for rehabilitation) Jordan Schroeder has essentially found a golden ticket to the big leagues in his offseason chocolate bar.

Kesler's injury opens up a gaping hole at pivot in the top-six, and while Maxim Lapierre finished the season as the club's fourth winger, there is no one in the organization as well suited to assume Kesler's position in the short-term, as the Canucks hope Jordan Schroeder is. Jordan Schroeder impressed when I watched him this past season, and by the numbers improved in every facet of the game, but will he really be ready to fill in for Ryan Kesler in a prescribed role this October? 

We'll take a closer look after the jump.

As mentioned above, Jordan Schroeder showed enormous improvement in both ends this season. Plus/minus is a dubious stat at the best of times, but he improved from a -10 last season, to a +8 this year and that's something. In talking with Jim Jamieson today, Schroeder credited Craig MacTavish for helping him polish his defensive game:

“This year, with coach MacTavish, he helped me a lot, adding stuff to my game, trying to make me a better all-around player.”

Having seen Schroeder play live, and watched several Wolves games on Neulion throughout the season, I wouldn't have described him as a defensive force. But Schroeder did seem to see a good deal of the puck, and his speed is exceedingly dangerous through the neutral zone. 

MacTavish notably sheltered the "kids" during his time in Edmonton, and while Schroeder wasn't drawing the toughest defensive matchups for the Wolves this past year, we can see from his zone-start deployment in the postseason that Mac-T wasn't worried about putting Schroeder out on the ice in defensive situations. Alain Vigneault will likely be more reticent of course, but as Canucks fans have seen in the past, if a young player is unable to play solid hockey in their end of the rink on an Alain Vigneault team - they find themselves riding a lot of pine.

Playing NHL hockey will be an adjustment for Schroeder, and it's a rare twenty-two year old who is able to help his team drive play in their rookie season in the NHL. But there are reasons to suspect that Schroeder wouldn't be enough of a "defensive liability" to prevent him from winning an opening day roster spot with a strong showing in the preseason.

On the offensive side of the puck, Schroeder's goal scoring came along in a big way this season. Increased ice-time was a major reason for Schroeder doubling his goal scoring output, and the spike in his goals scored resulted from a higher shot volume. In 2010-11, Schroeder took 87 shots in 61 games (1.43 per game) scoring ten goals. I'd mentioned that low volume of shots as something I thought he needed to improve on in his sophmore campaign in the AHL, and he did so, adding nearly an entire shot per game this season (2.4 shots per game).

  GP Goals Assists Points Shooting% NHLE G NHLE A NHLE Pts
2010-11 61 10 18 28 11.5% 6 11 17
2011-12 76 21 23 44 11.5% 10 11 21

Though there is still much room for improvement, Schroeder's twenty goal season was the result of a spike in his shot volume, and not the result of bounces or "riding the percentages." That bodes very well for his development as an offensive player.

Using Gabriel Desjardins' league translation numbers (NHLE), Schroeder's performance in the AHL this season would have been worth 21 NHL points this year. While that isn't very good for a top-six forward, NHLE numbers are just a guideline and reflect last seasons performance, so they tell us roughly where Schroeder is at now but don't forecast next season's performance particularly well. Schroeder will probably continue to improve next season and beyond, and his 21 NHLE points as a 21 year old are superior to the 20 NHLE points that Cody Hodgson recorded as a 21 year old in the same league.

Over the past several seasons, the Canucks have been extremely patient with Jordan Schroeder's development. He didn't join the team as a "Black Ace" for the 2010-11 run to the Stanley Cup Finals, and he didn't even get a non-fat peppermint latte with the big club this season (even as the likes of Mark Mancari, Bill Sweatt and even Viktor Victor Oreskovich did).

Throwing Schroeder into the fire, and playing him in the top-six this October - assuming he's able to win the job out of training camp - would be breaking with the clubs patient approach. But, when you consider how thin the UFA crop at centre is this summer (the only borderline "top-six" centremen on the market are:  Jokinen, Hecht, Stoll, Langkow, Kelly, Arnott, Morrison), and that the teams only in-house options are Maxim Lapierre and maybe Andrew Ebbett if he's re-signed; Gillis and company may not have many options. 

I'd expect the club will at least bring in a veteran to push for that second line centre spot along with Schroeder. Of course, if the Canucks are forced to turn to the American speedster to fill Kesler's shoes over the short-term, at least they could do an awful lot worse.

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 BuzMeg
May 10 2012, 04:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

What about a line of Booth-Schroeder-Kassian? It'd be like something out of Game of Thrones The Archer-The Dwarf-The Toothless Oaf

Avatar
#2 Alex
May 10 2012, 12:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

October is always a write-off with this team anyways (while Luongo's been here...) so why not use it as a sort of extended training camp to assess some of the fringe/young talent in the organization.

Avatar
#4 J21 (@Jyrki21)
May 10 2012, 01:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

"Viktor" Oreskovich? Poor guy mistaken for Russian again (not that there's anything wrong with that [И в самом деле, нет ничего плохого.])...

Avatar
#5 canuckistanian
May 10 2012, 02:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Interested to see what Shroeder can bring. Would like to see a kids line like that. Even more excited about a potential Booth-Kesler-Jensen line.

Avatar
#6 Mantastic
May 10 2012, 03:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

if we've learned anything from the 2011-2012 season is that the canucks cannot have a productive team with another sheltered line besides the Sedins.

Avatar
#7 Canucks
May 10 2012, 06:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Wholly smokes I laughed hard. That's pretty good stuff!!

Avatar
#8 dan
May 11 2012, 07:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

As I posted in February. advanced stats showed that A. Vermette was a great pick up. HIs playoff stats this yr also confirm this. His $ is tolerable. And, would have solved our third line issue atwo =way player. Plus -only costs two picks? yr. right crop is week.adv. stats say pick up Wellwood very underrated but AV doesn't appreciate his value. Don't think JS is ready for top 6.& team would look bad after trading Cody...look for them to try & get a cheaper alternative...

Avatar
#9 They're $hittie
May 12 2012, 05:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

LOL, this is the prospect you think is going to replace kesler. Terrible. not going to be the player they thought he was at the draft.

American college and national players do not develop properly because of lack of competition, and short seasons.

Avatar
#10 Dom
May 19 2012, 07:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I remember when the kid line was Schaefer-Morrison-Cooke

How times have changed...

Comments are closed for this article.