Canucks acquire Sammy Pahlsson from Columbus

Cam Charron
February 27 2012 12:19PM

The Vancouver Canucks made their first deal of deadline just before 11 am on Monday, acquiring Sammy Pahlsson from the Columbus Blue Jackets for a pair of fourth round draft picks.

This is quite the interesting move for the Canucks, for starters, it looks like he will be the added forward depth that can play some tough competition as a defensive specialist. Pahlsson is no stranger to tough minutes, starting just 32.2% of his shifts in the offensive zone and he's third among forwards in quality of competition faced.

Read past the jump for more analysis.

He's a guy that both the numbers guys, and the traditionalists will like. He was part of that terrific Anaheim shut-down unit during their Stanley Cup run in 2007 that beat out the Canucks and won the Cup, playing alongside Travis Moen and Rob Niedermayer.

The impending unrestricted free agent in Pahlsson is a clear "buyer" move for the Canucks. His cap hit of $2.65M goes off the books at the end of the season which may have made him a slightly more attractive option to the team over Steve Ott.

So, Pahlsson will be around to complement Manny Malhotra, most likely, and probably won't take away the major face-off duties from the Canucks in the defensive zone. But at 51.1%, he gives the team a little bit more depth and potentially gives the Canucks three guys on that fourth line (or first checking unit, the other being Maxim Lapierre) who can take a draw if necessary. That's a lot of insurance in case Malhotra gets waived out of the circle.

This sets the team up for a very good fourth line. All three hypothetical members (Malhotra, Lapierre and Pahlsson) will have demonstrated a proven ability to play against tough competition in defensive situations. It means that the team won't be required to dress Dale Weise or Byron Bitz going forward, but the fact the team now has two guys outside the lineup who can be comfortable in the lineup helps the team as well.

As for the return, we know that draft picks act as magic beans and have tangibly very little value. A team can sometimes get lucky past the first round, but the Canucks haven't drafted an impact player in the fourth round in quite some team.

"It's weird to be traded but it's good to come to a good team," Pahlsson told TSN a few minutes after the deal was announced, who was very reserved and seemed quite emotional about the trade, although he spoke with some optimism about joining the club. "It's been a bit of a tough run for us in Columbus and it's not a lot of fun when you're number 30 in the league."

"I hope I do," Pahlsson told TSN's James Duthie when asked if he still had the elite defensive game that had him in Conn Smythe talk back during 2007. "It's always hard to play your best, I guess, but I'm going to give it all I got I guess."

63811cbf517d2d685ea09e103488ea3a
Cam Charron is BC-raised hockey fan and journalist and acts as the managing editor of The Leafs Nation. In his spare time, you can find him blogging about numbers at Canucks Army, discussing the juniors at Yahoo's Buzzing the Net, ranting in some way or another at the Score's Backhand Shelf, or acting as an MSM wannabe in the pages of the Vancouver Province.
Avatar
Reply #1 Cam Davie February 27 2012, 12:24PM
+1 0 props

The Canucks traded 2 4th rd picks to get Pahlsson, while Chicago used a 2nd rd and a 3rd rd pick to get Johnny Oduya.

Holy moly... Gillis knows what he's doing.

Avatar
Reply #2 NoOtt February 27 2012, 12:28PM
+1 0 props

So obviously Ott is out of the question. Darn. But Pahlsson does NOT sound happy at all! Sounds miserable coming to the Canucks. Hopefully the Sedins can cheer him up!

Avatar
Reply #3 Jay February 27 2012, 12:30PM
+1 0 props

He didn't seem too enthused on TSN to be coming to the Canucks

Avatar
Reply #4 Cam Davie February 27 2012, 12:31PM
+1 0 props

@NoOtt

I wouldn't pay much attention to that. He just found out that he has to uproot his family or leave them for several months.

Booth sounded pretty miserable when he left Florida. He cried, remember? Now... David Booth clearly loves playing for the Canucks.

Pahlsson with his buddies, the Sedins, he'll be stoked once he works out the logistics of moving to Vancouver.

Avatar
Reply #5 Tach February 27 2012, 12:36PM
+1 0 props

Is Pahlsson not also injury cover for Malhotra in the playoffs? To a certain extent, Vancouver relies on the big O-Zone start number for the Sedins. This way, if Malhotra goes down, they have someone who can step right into that role, in addition to bolstering that Malhotra line.

Avatar
Reply #6 Melvin Jack February 27 2012, 12:43PM
+1 0 props

If that's all the Canucks do today, I will be happy. Giving up next to nothing and adding Sami is great, why mess with a line up that is obviously doing good? Great pick up!

Avatar
Reply #7 Matt February 27 2012, 12:45PM
+1 0 props

Contrary to what is being stated on this board, I don't like the deal. Pahlsson is 34 and 5 years removed from any sort of NHL relevance. Without looking for his face-off %, I am at a bit of a loss to understand what he brings to the Canucks lineup. Last time I saw him play he didn't have the wheels to keep up in the offensive zone and he is not exactly a sandpaper type who will help wear the other team down in the playoffs. A mediocre addition; and while 2 x 4th rd draft picks is peanuts, I don't see the value in adding a player well past him prime, who brings more of what we already have in spades. One thumb down

Avatar
Reply #8 Austin February 27 2012, 12:46PM
+1 0 props

What are some of the advanced stats on him?

Avatar
Reply #9 TigerUnderGlass February 27 2012, 12:46PM
+1 0 props

@Cam Davie

Gillis knows what he's doing.

I think this deal tells us more about Howson than Gillis.

Avatar
Reply #10 J37 February 27 2012, 12:49PM
+1 0 props

Seems like a saavy pick-up. I'd still like to see them swing a deal for a top 4 d-man who can play the right side or even just a top 6 d-man who can play the right side.

Avatar
Reply #11 NoOtt February 27 2012, 12:52PM
+1 0 props

@Matt

I couldn't agree more. Another old player to get injured in the playoffs. Do the Canucks really need another injured player with no grit. Not to mention there are still no d-man.

Canucks are 1 top 4 injury away from:

Alberts-Hamhuis Edler-Salo Tanev-Rome

NO thanks! No thanks at all!

Avatar
Reply #12 NoOtt February 27 2012, 01:33PM
+1 0 props

Staios? What a joke. Gillis just lost his job.

Comments are closed for this article.