Is Keith Ballard's concussion a capcussion?

Thomas Drance
February 25 2012 01:11PM

 

It was nine regular season games ago, Thursday February 9th, when the Canucks - about to play Keith Ballard's hometown team, the Minnesota Wild - announced that the underachieving defenseman was injured . The team never gave a timeline but it was clear that he'd be out of the line-up for a while, especially as the injury changed in nature from whiplash, to a possible concussion to, true story, "upper-body symptoms." 

Up until today there's been a lot of speculation about the nature of the injury, and whether or not Ballard would go on long-term injured reserve (LTIR) as a result. If he was placed on LTIR, it was noted, he'd free up a fair bit of cap-space for the trade deadline. As it turns out, that's exactly what has happened.

Read on past the jump!

Today Vancouver's hockey club made it official, placing Ballard on LTIR, a move that gives the Canucks (at least) 4.6 million dollars in cap-space going into the trade deadline (via capgeek). Of course, they could have even more cap-space than that, as Andrew Ebbett and Aaron Volpatti are both eligible to go on LTIR as well. Here's Bob Mckenzie, reporting the Ballard news:

It's worth noting that most Vancouver sports media seem to regard Ballard's injury with some suspicion. There are several reasons for this, mostly that the timing of Ballard's injury was convenient from a "flexibility under the cap" perspective. Secondly, and I may get into trouble for saying this, but the injury itself is convenient.

I don't mean to seem callous, and I wish Ballard a speedy recovery. That said, the team's comments on the injury have focused on their being unsure about whether or not it's a concussion or a neck injury. Considering that concussions are a sensitive subject, and taking into account the recent misdiagnosis of Sidney Crosby's concussion (he'd also suffered a neck injury), a neck or concussion injury is really the ideal political cover for the Canucks.

I'm not saying that this is a phantom injury, but I'd say it's fair to suggest that, if you were planning on having a player come down with a phantom injury in order to increase your team's flexibility under the salary cap, Ballard's reported injury would be the way to play it.  

It makes me squirm to describe someone going down with a neck injury as "lucky," but if Ballard's injury is what the team says it is, any move that the Canucks make at the deadline will have been made possible by the timing of it. That's lucky. Though, of course, sometimes you make your own luck.

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 John Andress
February 25 2012, 02:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I understand your point but it would seem to go contrary to Mike Gillis' oft stated opinion that what the Canucks really need going into the playoffs is as much depth on defense as they can get their hands on. I don't know whether going on LTIR eliminates Ballard from playoff eligibility but, if he is not available, that leaves Coach Vee choosing the third defense pairing from Tanev/Rome/Alberts/Sulzer with Connaughton, Sauve, Polasek and Baumgartner in Chicago. Not much depth there I am thinking. Now if the target was a major defensive piece it might make some sense. If not, I think he is leaving himself a bit weak on the back end. Interesting times ahead. But wait! That's a curse, isn't it?

Avatar
#2 Lortimer
February 25 2012, 02:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If your not cheating ..your not trying!

In competitive sports and business every small edge is needed..All the great players/teams took advantage of situations (cheated) to maximize their chance of winning...

Its not about 'lying'?

If Ballard says I have a stiff neck/headache ..the Canucks are in their right to 'play it safe' and say

Keith we don't need you right now (we are not in a playoff race, and have d - depth) lets play it safe and sit you out to make sure your okay!for the playoffs.

(I believe Ballard has had concussion issues in the past? but not positive)

The fact the Canucks can benefit by this action is simply smart management.

Avatar
#4 albertabeef
February 25 2012, 03:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

It comes as no suprise from a team full of divers, whiners and cheaters

Avatar
#5 John Andress
February 25 2012, 08:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@albertabeef

Really? That's all you've got? Sad. Very sad.

Avatar
#6 Daniel W.
February 26 2012, 03:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Why do the writers here always post a ''Read past the jump''??

To the article: I do believe Ballard is genuinely injured, if it were ever to leak that it wasn't that would shine a pretty bad light on the canucks (and Ballard would be done here), but i get your point it does seem rather convenient that Ballard goes down right before the deadline...

Avatar
#7 albertabeef
February 26 2012, 08:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
John Andress wrote:

Really? That's all you've got? Sad. Very sad.

no, but its all that is needed.

Avatar
#8 John Andress
February 26 2012, 08:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@albertabeef

I hardly think so. But if it works for you, don't let reality interfere with your joyful little buzz.

Comments are closed for this article.