Canucks Prospect Patrick McNally Removed from Harvard Roster

Thomas Drance
December 10 2012 05:07PM

 

On Monday evening collgehockeynews.com reported that promising Canucks prospect Patrick McNally was removed from Harvard's Roster along with three other players ahead of Harvard's game against Umass Lowell.

Read past the jump for more. 

College Hockey News in their reporting of McNally's removal, imply that the Canucks prospect's removal may be related to the Harvard cheating scandal which, rocked the Cambridge based campus in late August and September:

Four players have been removed from Harvard's official roster and according to a report in The Crimson, some of the removals may be related to an academic scandal that swept the university late this past summer.

Max Everson, Patrick McNally and Mark Luzar were all removed from the Harvard roster last week. Stephen Michalek left the program in November and is currently playing for the Cedar Rapids Roughriders of the United States Hockey League.

We should note that any link between the academic scandals and McNally's removal are, as of this moment, unconfirmed:

There just isn't much available information at this point, but it's clear from McNally's removal that the offense - whatever is - is very serious. We'll update this post with more details as we get them.

Update 2:04 PM EST (December 11th): The Vancouver Sun's Brad Zeimer has confirmed with Harvard that Patrick McNally has "left" their men's hockey team. He tadds that we shouldn't expect any further comment on Harvard's end, and passes along the suggestion that McNally's departure may be linked to the Harvard cheating scandal:

Ziemer also passes along a quote from Harvard's Assistant Director of Athletic Communications who doesn't elaborate on the duration or nature of McNally's departure. So, depending on how the Canucks choose to handle this news, and I'd assume they'll handle it very delicately, we may not know for sure what's going on here for a while. 

It'll be interesting to see where McNally, who had a tremendous first season for the Crimson last year, goes from here. If the offensive defenseman decides to forfeit his NCAA eligibility, he's too old for Major Junior and would need a contract (though not necessarily an entry-level contract with the Canucks) before playing in either Kalamazoo or Chicago.

It's worth noting that such a sequence of events would work against GIllis' strategy of selecting NCAA players in the later rounds of the NHL draft. The Canucks prefer to pick NCAA bound prospects in later rounds precisely because doing so allows the club a few extra years in which they can monitor their progress, before deciding to offer the player an entry-level deal.

On the other hand, if McNally decides to return to Harvard he'd need to wait a while before he could re-join the team (presumably). We won't speculate any further, but needless to say this situation isn't ideal for a prospect with big league aspirations.

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 Mantastic
December 11 2012, 11:58AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
0
props

so much for Gillis loving prototypical "smart" players.

Avatar
#2 kaybee
December 10 2012, 05:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Embrace the hate, McNally.

What are the chances he goes pro sooner than later now?

Avatar
#3 Beantown Canuck
December 10 2012, 05:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Too old to go to the CHL. Are there other options for him to play for a year that won't ruin his eligibility to return to Harvard next season?

Avatar
#4 Patrick Johnston
December 10 2012, 06:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

If you were the coach of Harvard and you have legions of high-quality talents with brains lining up at your door, would you bother trying to bring back a kid you've kicked off the team in troubling circumstances?

Avatar
#5 Mack
December 10 2012, 07:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Would it be possible for him to sign a conditional contract with the Wolves or Kalamazoo so that when the lockout ends the Canucks could sign him to an ELC?

Of course, that's if they even want to maintain his rights after this incident.

Avatar
#6 Patrick Johnston
December 10 2012, 08:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

He's free to sign with anyone, anytime. Most college players wait till the end of the hockey season though, so they can complete their academic year (or most of it anyway).

Avatar
#7 Mack
December 10 2012, 09:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Yes, but he wouldn't be able to sign an ELC with the Canucks until the lockout ends. Just wasn't sure if they'd be able to retain his rights if he signed a deal.

Avatar
#8 Cam Charron
December 11 2012, 09:02AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Mack wrote:

Yes, but he wouldn't be able to sign an ELC with the Canucks until the lockout ends. Just wasn't sure if they'd be able to retain his rights if he signed a deal.

I think teams still have control over their prospects. The Oilers have been shuttling guys up and down between their farm clubs.

Avatar
#9 elvis15
December 11 2012, 10:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

He'd have to sign an AHL contract with the Wolves directly, as Taylor Hall did after healing from his injury. He could then play with the Wolves or be moved to Kalamazoo, or he could explore going to play over in Europe.

He just turned 21 so he's too old for the CHL and USHL, although he could appeal this to get back in to the Harvard squad (I haven't seen anything that says he's kicked out of school yet). We'll have to wait and see what happens with that first before we know any more about where he could end up.

Avatar
#10 kaybee
December 11 2012, 04:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

What about Europe?

Comments are closed for this article.