On the PR Front: Hamhuis, Bieksa and the NHLPA are Schooling the Owners

Thomas Drance
October 01 2012 11:48AM


Photo Credit: Steve Bosch, PNG, Vancouver Sun

Most close observers tend to agree that "Public Relations" won't matter much in shaping the outcome of a new CBA, and they're probably right. But for a gate driven business in the midst of a public negotiation, the public relations angle isn't meaningless. The current lockout is a three dimensional game of chess and every little bit of leverage matters, especially because the owners possess a large structural advantage (since they control a Monopoly on elite-level professional hockey in North America).

To that end, over the past week Kevin Bieksa and Dan Hamhuis - the Vancouver Canucks' ace shut-down pairing - have been on a subtle media blitz. In contrast with Daryl Katz's Seattle feint (which was bungled messily by the reactive @NHL_Oilers Twitter account), and Jimmy Develano's mishandling of facebook (and his series of stupid public comments that led to his $250,000 fine); what Bieksa and Hamhuis have managed to do over the past ten days has been doubly impressive.

Read past the jump for more.

Giving Back in Spite of the Lockout

Let's start with Dan Hamhuis, who along with his wife made a $100,000 donation last week to the Ronald McDonald House and BC Childrens Hospital in Vancouver. Dan Hamhuis has a long history of being a stellar human being, and I don't mean to cast aspersions on his motivations in this case (I have no doubt that his motivations are altruistic and sincere). The fact remains that it's just good PR anyway you slice it.

The Hamhuis family donation accomplishes two major things that benefit Hamhuis (and, indirectly the NHLPA as a whole). First off, it reminds casual Canucks fans about the active role Canucks players play giving back to the community. Secondly a sizable donation sends a message to the NHL and its owners that Dan Hamhuis, at least, isn't so concerned about his personal finances to prevent him from making a massive charitable contribution. 

Kevin Bieksa on the other hand, has led a charge to have Canucks players drop by minor midget team practices in the Vancouver area. He mentioned that several Canucks were planning on doing so to Jason Botchford early last week and then followed through in a big way. So far, Bieksa, Hamhuis and Mason Raymond have all dropped in on team practices across Vancouver. Again, I don't mean to unduly question the motivations of the players in this case (in part, they're probably fighting off some boredom), but from a PR perspective: appearing at a series of youth hockey practices is all upside.

At one of these practice drop-ins in particular, Bieksa and Hamhuis brought Brad Zeimer along, and the Vancouver Sun posted a story (with video) from the rink in North Van. The adulation their appearance engendered was predictable:

As I said, this is all upside for the NHLPA. Zeimer, for example, shared this colourful detail from the practice itself:

That's pretty hilarious, and no one was more ecstatic about Bieksa's rough-housing than the player who tried to make one of the league's best defensive defenseman look silly:

Winckers' other teammates were equally ecstatic, after all, they got to appear on Sportsnet as a result of Bieksa and Hamhuis' drop-in:

And they left practice with a bunch of signed memorabilia.

What a wicked all around hockey experience for those young men...

The NHLPA Mobile App

Beyond the midget AAA practice drop ins, Bieksa also appeared on local radio station The Fox and participated in a colourful interview on the Jeff O'Neil show. For the most part the interview is puffery, but Bieksa did drop one interesting detail about a method the NHLPA is using to disseminate information to their members, solicit feedback, and presumably, keep the players on message. Of course, we're talking about an NHLPA mobile app, via Pass it to Bulis:

Bieksa talks about the NHLPA’s website and mobile app that they use to keep the player’s updated. Apparently there’s also a feature for members of the NHLPA to give input on any of the issues surrounding the negotiations.

You can read more about the Players Association mobile app here

We've previously noted the uncanny way in which the players seem to escalate their rhetoric in concert with one another, and Justin Bourne noted the eerie level of coordination that is apparent on Twitter too. Hell, the NHLPA's practice jerseys even have a hashtag on them: "#theplayers."

Taking advantage of the mainstream penetration of social media gives the players a new avenues with which to speak directly with fans and plead their case. Meanwhile the clever use of smart phone apps has apparently given the NHLPA a new way to communicate and coordinate with their members. Some of the players' actions - the recent midget practice drop ins being a prime example - have leveraged these "PR/social media assets" perfectly. Other uses of social media, on the other hand, are more controversial and probably less effective (see Barch, Krys).

Public Opinion and the NHL Lockout

Generally speaking, on the PR side of things I'd argue that the players have done a much better job than the NHL has - especially over the past ten days. Bieksa and Hamhuis' actions aren't reflected in a recent Forum Poll conducted last week on behalf of the National Post but nonetheless, I think there's positive news for the players in that poll.

According to the Forum Poll, nearly twice as many Canadians side with the players over the owners in the current lockout (18% to 8%). That ratio is consistent with the findings from a survey conducted by NRG Research Group and Peak Communicators. Sure, the vast majority (73% of respondents in the Forum Poll) of the ticket buying, game-watching public sided with neither party in the lockout, but the Forum Poll results look a lot more favorable to the players than the Ipsos-Reid results from 2004.

Obviously we have to be careful when comparing different polls, compiled by different companies 8 years apart. But according to Ipsos-Reid, during the previous lockout 52% of the Canadian public sided with the league's owners, and 21% sided with the players. With our limited data it's tough to definitively conclude much of anything, but I find it tough to believe that the erosion in Canadian public support for the NHL's owners (from 52% in 2004 to 8% last week) is just a statistical anomaly. 

Whether or not the so called "public relations battle" will matter over the course of this NHL lockout is a point of contention. The sideshow meetings this weekend where the NHL and the NHLPA discussed issues like drug testing and rule enforcement rather than HRR and a potential salary rollback, unsurprisingly accomplished nothing significant. At the moment, the players and the owners seem to be playing a game of brinksmanship, with neither side willing to "show their hand" by making the next meaningful offer.

In all likelihood, raw economic self-interest - and not the public's perception - will determine which side blinks first. But in a gate driven business you're mad to disregard the opinions of the paying public, and for what it's worth, the NHLPA appears to be going to greater lengths to communicate that particular point with the public. 

More NHL Lockout Coverage from CanucksArmy

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 Mantastic
October 01 2012, 01:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

altruistic? Hamhuis get's tax breaks by donating to charities. he and his wife would not donate 100,000 if he didn't have millions to begin with. altruism is JGL in Looper.

Avatar
#2 Diehardnuck
October 01 2012, 01:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Mantastic wrote:

altruistic? Hamhuis get's tax breaks by donating to charities. he and his wife would not donate 100,000 if he didn't have millions to begin with. altruism is JGL in Looper.

Thanks for your opinion - it has been duly noted and ignored.

Avatar
#3 Mantastic
October 01 2012, 02:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Diehardnuck wrote:

Thanks for your opinion - it has been duly noted and ignored.

it's not an opinion when actions don't fit the definition of the word. his actions are not altruistic.

Avatar
#4 Matt Pisko
October 01 2012, 02:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

And in one fell swoop, Krys Barch (http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/story/2012/09/30/sp-nhl-lockout-krys-barch-new-jersey-devils-brandon-prust-scott-norton-ontario-hockey-league.html) posts to Twitter and shreds any goodwill the Players Association may have gained.

Nothing against what Dan Hamhuis and family, nor any of the other players have done. Donating to charity and giving of their time to minor hockey are huge! These activities are also things that the players generally do when they are not locked out by their clubs.

i.e. Canucks for Kids Telethon, Canuck Place, BC Children's Hospital

On another note, don't billionaires also give to charity?

http://www.bcbusinessonline.ca/2008/10/09/francesco-aquilini-vancouver-canucks?page=5featurelist

https://bcchf.ca/assets/AboutUs/20082009AnnualReport.pdf

http://www.bcchf.ca/assets/AboutUs/20102011AnnualReport.pdf

The thing is, those donations of time and money don't make a sexy opinion piece.

Avatar
#5 Mr. Poppinfresh
October 01 2012, 02:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Mantastic wrote:

it's not an opinion when actions don't fit the definition of the word. his actions are not altruistic.

You know, Mantastic, it's a lot simpler and quicker to just type "I don't understand how marginal tax rates work", than to write two posts making a fool of yourself.

Tell me- which tax bracket does Hamhuis enter by reducing his taxable salary from $4.5 to $4.4 million dollars?

Avatar
#6 Mantastic
October 01 2012, 03:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Mr. Poppinfresh

it reduces the amount of taxes paid (which is a tax break), i did not mention anything about the margins or changing of his tax bracket

Avatar
#7 KleptoKlown
October 01 2012, 03:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

While it's nice to see technology continue to improve, one drawback has been that wireless internet is now available under bridges, and Mantastic is taking full advantage.

Lets just play along though, lets say the Hamhius' are penny pinchers just trying to get by in a tough economy by looking for every tax break they can find...

That 100k still ends up helping saving children's lives...What a bunch of selfish jerks those Hamhius' are.

Avatar
#8 Mantastic
October 01 2012, 03:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
KleptoKlown wrote:

While it's nice to see technology continue to improve, one drawback has been that wireless internet is now available under bridges, and Mantastic is taking full advantage.

Lets just play along though, lets say the Hamhius' are penny pinchers just trying to get by in a tough economy by looking for every tax break they can find...

That 100k still ends up helping saving children's lives...What a bunch of selfish jerks those Hamhius' are.

wow... i love how people try to read between the lines as opposed to what i actually wrote.

i didn't say anything about Hammer pinching pennies.

just saying he's not altruistic because he is also benefitting from his action. altruism is completely selfless, for the greater good of the community/society/world/etc. he's not taking money away from food or shelter from his wife or family, he's not sacrificing anything. true, he is helping out the community and i'm not saying he isn't but without sacrificing something, it's not altruistic

drance is just misusing the word

Avatar
#10 Mantastic
October 01 2012, 05:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Thomas Drance

altruistic: behavior exhibited from someone that may be to its disadvantage but that benefits others.

giving 100k isn't disadvantaging ones self when you have millions. he's not taking money away from food or shelter from his wife or family, he's not sacrificing anything.

by calling hammer altruistic really cheapens the word for people who are actually altruistic, like people donating stem cells or bone marrow.

Avatar
#11 antro
October 01 2012, 08:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Great article, Thomas, I've only been a casual observer, but I was getting this impression. I don't remember the PR stuff for the first lockout, but did remember most siding with the owners, and you gotta think that was related to the owners' messaging strategy. It's pretty clear this version of the NHLPA is getting good media advice. I also think you put it exactly right when you note that this isn't what will make or break the negotiations, but it's a game of chess, and it would be stupid to ignore the fans. The fact that Katz apologized is partial proof of this.

Now, what actually might strong-arm the owners a bit is the Labour Board rulings. Breaking the owners' united front would be a boon. Anyone read something about how likely one of the boards might find for the NHLPA position?

Avatar
#12 Kent Wilson
October 01 2012, 08:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Mantastic

I'd say the popular definition of altruism is, broadly, actions/concern for the welfare of others. If we go with the strict, Kantian definition of altruistic virtue (ie; pure altruism), then, yes, the equation would have be completely unbalanced in favor of the recipient.

Avatar
#13 Mr. Poppinfresh
October 02 2012, 01:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Mantastic wrote:

it reduces the amount of taxes paid (which is a tax break), i did not mention anything about the margins or changing of his tax bracket

A $100,000 charitable donation decreases his taxes by $29,000 for his federal taxes and around $14,000 on his B.C. taxes. So he still spent $57,000 more than he otherwise would have.

You gargantuan, ignorant clod.

Avatar
#14 Diehardnuck
October 02 2012, 02:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Mantastic wrote:

it's not an opinion when actions don't fit the definition of the word. his actions are not altruistic.

The fact that you don't understand the definition of the word does not change it's meaning. By your flawed definition you can't even feel good about an act of charity since that would be selfish. I suggest you spend more time reading and less time typing.

Comments are closed for this article.