miss me yet?

Thomas Drance
November 03 2011 12:35PM

The following is written by Andrey Osadchenko a Russian hockey writer whose work appears most often at the popular site allhockey.ru. You can also occassionally find Andrey's work at The Hockey News, on youtube (he's the co-host along with Steve Dangle of the popular web-series "Joining the Rush") and across the Nation Network.

Written by: Andrey Osadchenko

It was supposed to be another Cinderella story. A Russian prospect (always a gamble to begin with) came seemingly out of nowhere to scored 2 goals in his first preseason game against the Islanders in a 2:1 win for the Canucks. He kept it going and turned some heads when Alain Vigneault put him on a line with the Sedins for the rest of preseason, then started him on a second line with Ryan Kesler at the beginning of the regular season.

Yes it was 2009 and the future really looked bright for young Sergei Shirokov. Now he’s gone back to the KHL and the Canucks really may want to get this guy back. It’s hard to argue that Shirokov wasn’t ready for "The Show" right off the bat, his stat-line: 6 games, 0 points and a -4 tells you the entire story. It was clear once the preseason ended that Sergei Shirokov needed more time to adjust to North American hockey in the minors with the Manitoba Moose.

He notched 22 goals and had 23 assists for 45 points in 76 games in that 2009-10 season (his first in North America). Unfortunately for Shirokov, the next season the Canucks were lucky to have very few injuries up front as they made their way to the Presidents’ Trophy, destroying everyone on their way to the top.

Under these circumstances, who in the right mind would make any huge changes to the line-up? Not Alain Vigneault. No matter how well Shirokov performed in the AHL, his chances of making the Canucks roster were slim to say the least.

Shirokov, however, did improve his game with the Moose. In his second AHL season, Shirokov put up 22 goals and added 58 points in the regular season. He then notched another 7 goals and put up 10 points in 14 playoff games. He was the top scorer for the Moose in the regular season, and their second leading scorer behind Marco Rosa in the play-offs. Oh, and he also was invited to play at the AHL All-Star Game.

Sounds like a guy you may want to keep around, doesn’t it?

After a terrifying loss in the final series against the Boston Bruins, it was obvious that the Canucks needed to shake-up their roster to some extent. Changes began rolling in on the 1st of July, and the Canucks let go of: Raffi Torres, Jeff Tambellini, Tanner Glass and Sergei Shirokov. All 4 of those wingers are certainly good enough to play in the NHL.

Who did they sign to fill the void? Andrew Ebbett, Mark Mancari, Byron Bitz and Marco Sturm. Heck, they even gave Owen Nolan another shot on at PTO deal! And how did it pan out? They didn’t waste any time realizing the answer, and traded Marco Sturm 6 games into the season.

Did they really think that Marco Sturm was a better bet than Tambellini and Shirokov? The guy is 33 years old, scored 5 goals last season and has no points in the first 10 games of this season, only 6 of which he played for the Canucks before being traded.

A of Tuesday the Canucks were 8th in the league in goal-scoring, which also isn’t bad. Although, if you leave Chris Higgins and Cody Hodgson out, the goals come pretty much only from the Sedin line. Secondary scoring hasn’t been the biggest issue for the Canucks so far, but after Roberto Luongo’s string of sub-average performances it qualifies as something that most Canucks fans are concerned about.

So what's going on Sergei Shirokov at the moment? Well he's a leading scorer for CSKA in the KHL with 9+12=21 points in 20 games. He's tied for 5th place in the league in the scoring department. He was also called to play for National Team Russia at the upcoming Karjala Cup in Finland and it's no wonder why, who doesn’t want to have a guy who averages 1.05 point per game in one of the top three hockey leagues in the world?

Jeff Tambellini, on the other hand, is a leading scorer for the Zurich Lions in the NLA, which is the top league in Switzerland. In 19 games he scored 10 goals and had 6 assists. Both of them could have played on the Canucks second line right now. Tambellini played most of the last regular season in the NHL. Perhaps, Shirokov deserved the right to replace him this season?

Alas, we’ll never find that out. But at the moment it looks like the Canucks were somewhat unfair to Shirokov, and may have lost-out on the chance to develop a really good prospect.

A prospect they were lucky to have to begin with.

Andrey Osadchenko is the Nation Network's Russian Hockey Correspondent. You can follow him on twitter here .

3136ae487fac57943f99a50e66e4d6cf
Thomas Drance lives in Toronto, eats spicy food and writes about hockey. He is an NHL News Editor at theScore, the ex-managing editor of CanucksArmy.com and an opinionated blowhard to boot. You can follow him on twitter @thomasdrance.
Avatar
#1 Perry
November 03 2011, 12:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I am pretty sure Shirokov headed to the KHL knowing that there was no chance he could crack the Canucks top 6. Could be a gem for FLA if he decides to comeback.

Tambelinni was good for like a month with Kesler and Hansen then his most notable accomplishment was backchecking Erat on a breakaway, and for that we thank you seed of evil.

I'd take Booth over Raymond/Tambo on the 2nd with Cody Godson spreading the gospel with him.

And I'll take a much more consistent Chris Higgins over Raffi Hova Torres.

Avatar
#2 Scott McKenzie
November 03 2011, 01:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I'm fairly confident that anyone else in the Canucks top six right now would rip up Europe as well.

Avatar
#3 Trevor Presiloski
November 04 2011, 01:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

There's so many leaps in logic with this entry that I'm skeptical the author isn't Australian and his mother was a kangaroo.

The Canucks had excellent cap management last season which was in part helped by the numerous injuries the team sustained. It allowed guys like Jeff Tambellini to bounce up and down in the minors and for Gillis to make some trade deadline deals.

Higgins and Lapierre were two of those players and they were both retained. It wasn't feasible to hang onto Torres, Tambellini and Glass. And Shirokov. It also ignores Mikael Samuelsson, who was a potential top six candidate. (Nevermind the fact that guys like Glass & Torres serve a completely different purpose than Shirokov.)

This also ignores the biggest elephant in the room: the Canucks top 6 was pretty entrenched. You have the Sedins, Burrows and Kesler with their spots carved out for them.

Then you have guys like Higgins, Samuelsson, Raymond and someone you neglected to mention, and who has a better pedigree than Shirokov: Cody Hodgson.

It should be noted Shirokov is 25 years old. Hodgson is only 21 years and still has time to develop AND has the benefit of the doubt due to his injuries. Plus RFA status, which is important for cap management reasons. Shirokov was a year away from UFA eligibility, I think, and most likely would've looked into other teams that might've be interested in giving him an expanded role.

All this, and I haven't really gotten into his ability as a player.

Shirokov has offensive tools. The problem is that his defensive game is completely lacking. In a top six that has guys like Higgins, Kesler, Burrows and Raymond, all guys who can score goals and serve time on the PK, Shirokov couldn't compete and arguably could be a liability. He wasn't really what the Canucks needed.

Speaking of defense...that's more what's hurting the Canucks right now, with Salo potentially out and Ehrhoff leaving the team in the offseason. Canucks have managed to chase 3 goalies from the crease so far this season (Kiprusoff, Vokoun and Rinne.)

Yes, they've been getting shut out, but their special teams have been a mess, one of the team's better 2 way forwards, Manny Malhotra, is having issues this year and they've been inept in their own zone.

Comments are closed for this article.