Inconsistent Iginla, Team Canada Edition

Pat Steinberg
February 22 2010 08:46AM

Ice Hockey - Day 7 - Switzerland v Canada

It's been an up and down Olympics for Team Canada forward Jarome Iginla, not unlike his season with the Calgary Flames. Some pretty good highs, and some pretty invisible periods which you can classify as lows. And after a 5-3 win loss to Team USA on Sunday night, I'm still not sure what to make of Jarome Iginla, Team Canada Edition.

In his first game, I wrote about how he gelled and meshed with linemates Sidney Crosby and Rick Nash. He scored three goals that game in under 10 minutes of ice time, and he clearly earned a shot to start on that top unit at the beginning of Canada's second game. And he did, but the results weren't great. In fact, Iginla was yanked from the Crosby-Nash unit in the second period of that game.

Canada's 3-2 shootout win over Switzerland saw Iginla's useage scaled back throughout — so much so that he was the main topic on our FAN 960 postgame show. He played just two minutes in the third period and didn't see the game once in overtime, making some wonder whether there was some sort of injury.However, Mike Babcock said following the game that it wasn't an injury — so it was performance related. Fair enough; he wasn't great. He wasn't nearly as engaged as he needs to be against the Swiss, was easier to push off the puck, and wasn't really a factor most of the time while he was on the ice.

So, it's game three for Canada, their biggest test yet, against the Americans. The big story was that Flyers captain Mike Richards would start on the Crosby-Nash line, and he did. That didn't last long. The coaching staff was pretty quick to go back to Patrice Bergeron in that game, and then eventually to #12. Iginla started on a 4th line rotation with Jonathan Toews, Brenden Morrow and Bergeron. But by the end of the game, that changed.

Iginla saw some powerplay time on the top unit in the second period, and Canada trailed the US 3-2 after two periods of play. But it seemed the coaching staff decided to go back to the well in the final frame, and I think we saw something once again. Iginla saw time with Crosby and Nash for most of the third period... and we saw some chemistry once again.

It was most evident late in the third, when Canada had got themselves back within one: Iginla was on the ice for a dominating shift that lasted almost 90 seconds. Canada got three or four quality scoring opportunities, only to be robbed by Ryan Miller in the US net each time. Iginla was a big part of that, and you started to think that maybe there was something there

Almost unanimously on our postgame show on The FAN 960 on Sunday, the feeling was Iginla should get another shot on that top unit. And why not? Canada needs to get something going quick, as they enter single elimination play on Tuesday against Germany. I think Iginla earned another shot with Crosby and Nash to start Tuesday. The problem is, he needs to prove he should stick there. He needs to be the factor he was on Canada's third goal, when Miller cheated towards him in the slot and gave Crosby the opening he needed to score. If we see that, maybe we'll be correct in saying there's something there. If he doesn't, and it's the same old story — wondering just where he fits.

1cd23297a0d13720ec2fc6d9740ce395
Pat Steinberg can be heard daily on the Fan960 in Calgary at can be read at the FAN 960. Born and raised in Calgary, Steinberg considers himself a huge fan of all sports including the CFL, MMA and 13 round bare knuckle boxing matches. Follow Steinberg on Twitter at www.twitter.com/Fan960Steinberg.
Avatar
#1 Snoop Blogg
February 22 2010, 09:02AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Hes going to play great against germany, they have the skill level that he flourishes against

Avatar
#2 Harlie
February 22 2010, 11:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

wake up Jar Jar Binks!

Avatar
#3 wax for my stick
February 22 2010, 12:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

anybody with skill can look good against a weaker team...im gonna asume he'll play good against the germans...the real test for him is the russians

Avatar
#4 R O
February 22 2010, 12:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Iginla with Toews and Morrow actually dominated the top US scoring line in the first period. And of course the Crosby line was really pouring it on with Iggy on the wing (although they did that all night no matter who their right winger was).

Avatar
#5 george
February 22 2010, 01:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
R O wrote:

Iginla with Toews and Morrow actually dominated the top US scoring line in the first period. And of course the Crosby line was really pouring it on with Iggy on the wing (although they did that all night no matter who their right winger was).

Really?

Crosby was a -3 Were you not watching the same game I was. Crosby line did not do a thing until Iggy showed up with them.

Yet the fourth line Iggy was on did more than hold it's own for the first two periods.

This is not a problem with Iggy, this is a coaching problem, LEAVE IGGY ON THE TOP LINE. That IS there best line.

Avatar
#6 R O
February 22 2010, 03:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Really? Crosby was a -3 Were you not watching the same game I was. Crosby line did not do a thing until Iggy showed up with them. Yet the fourth line Iggy was on did more than hold it's own for the first two periods. This is not a problem with Iggy, this is a coaching problem, LEAVE IGGY ON THE TOP LINE. That IS there best line.

I'm pretty sure we were watching different games. Because Crosby was dominant despite the -3 (and really, I don't want to argue about plus-minus in one-game snapshots because it won't end well), he was all over the ice and the puck and the US defenders couldn't contain him.

And beyond that I actually agreed that Iggy dominated when he was on the Toews line.

Avatar
#7 operator 76
February 22 2010, 03:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I know that everyone can't belevie what is going on but i mean no one has played on this team enough to geal or mesh . Crosby , Iginla and Nash did what 3 nhl super stars should do they set up plays and scored goals . Maybe we should stop looking at the endless line combo's and start looking at the team concept .

Anything less then gold is a failure .

Avatar
#8 RossCreekNation
February 22 2010, 05:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Lines at today's practice...

Staal-Crosby-Iginla
Nash-Getzlaf-Perry
Marleau-Thornton-Heatley
Morrow-Toews-Richards
Bergeron

Luongo starting.

Avatar
#9 SmellOfVictory
February 23 2010, 03:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
RossCreekNation wrote:

Lines at today's practice...

Staal-Crosby-Iginla
Nash-Getzlaf-Perry
Marleau-Thornton-Heatley
Morrow-Toews-Richards
Bergeron

Luongo starting.

Not bad. I like the swap of Staal and Nash, because quite frankly I think Nash's "chemistry" with Crosby has been overrated. The dude has made a number of mistakes (albeit mostly ones that aren't costly) that had me facepalming. The real key to the top line is that Crosby is godly and can probably play well with just about anyone, including a mistake-prone fancypants like Nash. I'll bet if you stuck Bertuzzi and Jokinen on Crosby's wings they'd end up looking a hell of a lot better than they are, and people would gush about how they had "chemistry" on the line.

Comments are closed for this article.